|
General: NUMERO PI=3.1416=22/7 EN EL MISMO NOMBRE DE YHWH
Scegli un’altra bacheca |
Rispondi |
Messaggio 1 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
This term “Pixel” which happens to be like the smoking gun in proving the artificial Matrix, is why we have “Pi” & “Phi” and “Patmos Island” as codes:
PIXEL ~~~ the number PI (3.14…)
PIXEL ~~~ the number “PHI“
PIXEL ~~~ Patmos Island
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phi
ANY SIMIL BETWEEN THE GREEK LETTER FOR No. “PI” AND THE HEBREW LETTER “H” IN THE TETRAGRAMMATON IS SHEER COINCIDENCE…?
Tetragrammaton (reads from right to left as YHVH in hebrew)
Number “PI” in the Matrix
Number “PI” as to number “PHI”
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 570 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
LAST UPDATED: 27 NOVEMBER 2024
You may know Paris for its cathedral Notre-Dame, the Eiffel Tower, its café culture and its amazing museums and art galleries. The French capital is also famous for its fantastic perspective that runs from the Louvre to La Défense. This is the ‘Voie Triomphale’, aka the Historical Axis of Paris.
This line is one of the most prestigious perspectives in the world. In fact, its design has inspired cities such as Buenos Aires, Washington DC, New Delhi and Canberra. In this article, we’ll learn more about the Historical Axis of Paris. We’ll discover the stunning monuments and I reveal to you some stunning facts.
What is the Historical Axis of Paris?
The glass pyramid and the historical axis of Paris © French Moments
The Historical Axis, also known in French as “Axe Historique”, “Voie Triomphale” or “Voie Royale” is orientated on a 26° angle.
It follows the course of the Sun from its rising in the East to its setting in the West.
Oddly, this angle of orientation is the same as that of Paris’ Notre-Dame Cathedral, some 1,000 metres away from the Louvre Palace.
More than just a series of monuments placed along the axis, it seems that a complex symbolism was at work in the mind of the successive urban planners.

The Historical Axis runs through some of Paris’ most celebrated monuments and squares:
Let’s move along the Historical Axis of Paris, from East to West, starting from the Louvre.
The Palace of the Louvre

Today the great perspective starts at the Louvre, immediately beyond the Church of St Germain l’Auxerrois.
The crab-shaped Palace was the main residence of the kings of France until 1682, when Louis XIV, the ‘Sun King’, moved his court to Versailles. It currently houses one of the world’s most wonderful museums in a complex that is known as the “Grand Louvre”.
The Louvre today © French Moments
The controversial glass pyramid of the Louvre
President François Mitterrand left his mark with his pharaonic project of “Le Grand Louvre”. He wished to complete it for the bicentennial celebration of the French Revolution in 1989. The titanic project comprised of major renovation works and the construction of a new landmark along the Historical Axis: the celebrated (and controversial) Glass Pyramid.
But if you look closer, you’ll notice that the glass pyramid is not aligned with the other monuments on the Historical Axis.
That’s why something had to be added in this vast courtyard of the Louvre…
https://frenchmoments.eu/historical-axis-of-paris-la-voie-triomphale/ |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 571 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
That's right: Sirius rises at 26 degrees south of east, or bearing 116 degrees, from the latitude of Paris, and this is the direction in which the Champs Elysées is aligned.
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 572 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 573 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 574 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 575 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
Dimensions of the Cheops-pyramid (Khufu's pyramid)
Numbers and figures of the Cheops (Khufu) pyramid: The pyramid of Khufu - Output / performance - Building material - Dimensions of the pyramid - Dimensions in Royal Cubits - Sources
Cheops-pyramid (pyramid of Khufu)
Of the the famous Seven Wonders of the Ancient World the Great Pyramid of Khufu (Cheops) at Giza is the only one still standing. Even for modern men it is amazing how this man-made structure lasted so long.
The Giza pyramids must have made an incredible visual impact - at the edge of the desert three abstract geometrical symbols were rising, huge luminous white triangles reflecting the blinding light of the sun!
The pyramids on the Giza plateau are with 146.59m (Khufu / Cheops) and 143.87m (Khafre / Chefren) respectively the largest, however there are over 30 major pyramids and a myriad of smaller pyramids in Egypt.
Cheops-Pyramid 1. Entrance 2. Entrance cut by grave robbers 3. Subterranean chamber 4. Grand Gallery 5. King's chamber, relieving chambers, granite portcullis slabs 6. Queen's chamber 7. Shaft 8. Limestone plugging the air shaft A= "Air shafts"
Output / performance
Detailed calculations how many workers were necessary to build the pyramid
Overview pyramid building
Builder ------------------- |
|
Khufu (Chuefui-Chnum or Khnum-Khuf, Cheops in Greek) during the 4th dynasty of the old kingdom |
Time to build |
|
Probably max. 23 years (Khufu reigned from 2551 to 2528 before Christ *). Herodotus writes about 10 years of preparation and 20 years of building (details of the text) |
Per day |
|
With 2'500'000 stones 342 stones have to be moved daily (working during 365 days a year) or 431 stones daily (working during 290 days a year). |
Per minute
|
|
10-hour day: every 2 minutes a stone (34 to 43 per hour) 8-hour day: nearly a stone every minute (42 to 53 stones per hour)
|
Rule of thumb |
|
While construction the pyramid the rate of delivery was 1 stone weighting 2.5 tons every minute. |
For our calculations we assume 500 stones a day. This is a rough estimate, assuming a 8-hour day, during 290 days a year, with 20 years to build the pyramid. Also assuming, that more time had to be used for the huge granite blocks for the King's chamber and for the more difficult upper part of the pyramid, where work went slower than in the lower parts. There probably were also other factors delaying the building of the pyramid such as the weather or a temporary shortage of certain building materials.
|
Building materials for the Cheops-pyramid

The Khufu-pyramid (Cheops) probably originally had 210 stone layers. At 50m height already 82% of the entire pyramid was built [3].
Quarrying stones for the pyramid
Shipping the stone blocks down the Nile to Giza
Transporting the stone blocks using a sledge on tracks
Löhner's rope roll
Stone blocks ------------------- |
|
2'300'000 stones |
Casing blocks |
|
115'000 to 200'000 stones or 67'390m³ [1] |
Total blocks |
|
2'500'000 stones |
Stone layers |
|
Originally probably 210 stone layers, now only 201 layers [2] |
Stone size |
|
The stone blocks usually are larger in the lower layers (1.5m = 3 cubit) and smaller in the upper layers. Most are between 1.5 and 2 cubit large (average of 127 x 127 x 71cm). 1 cubit = 0.524m - Details |
Weight of the stone blocks |
|
With an average density of 2,6 - 2,9 t/m³ the large limestone blocks weighted 6.5 - 10 tons and the smaller ones about 1.3 tons. For all calculations on this website an average weight of 2.5 tons was used. |
Special blocks |
|
For the King's chamber granite blocks weighting 40 to 50 tons were used |
Total weight |
|
6'500'000 tons (average weight of a block was about 2.5 tons) |
Pyramidion |
|
The final stone on the top was a large block in the shape of a pyramid. It was perhaps around 1.5m by 1.5m wide and 1.3m high (about 3 cubits). It was made from white Tura limestone (Turah), granite or perhaps diorite and perhaps gold plated. More information |
Building materials |
|
Pyramid: Nummulite limestone from quarries about 200-400m south of the pyramid were used for the core stones. Casing: light white limestone, so called Tura-limestone from quarries from the eastern shores of the Nile King's chamber: Rose granite from Aswan 900km away Further materials: Graywacke from the Wadi Hammamat (Eastern desert), basalt from the northern Faiyum
Map of quarries in Egypt
|
Dimensions of the pyramid of Khufu

Length (a) ------------------- |
|
The average length of the edge is ~ 230.360m (230,12m = 440 cubits). Northern edge 230.328m - eastern edge 230.369m - southern edge 230.372m - western edge 230.372m. Largest difference is only 4.4cm. [3] |
Height (h) |
|
Originally 146.59m high (= 280 cubits), the pyramid is now only 138.75m high [7] |
Diagonal (d) |
|
325.77m |
Ridge (g) |
|
219m |
Height of the lateral surface |
|
186.42m |
Pyramid angle α |
|
51° 50' 40' = inclination of the lateral surface (= 52° rounded off) [3] which corresponds to a seked of 5½ palms |
Pyramid angle β |
|
58.3° = the two angles of the triangular lateral surface (62° = angle of the apex or tip of the pyramid) - nearly forming an equilateral triangle! |
Pyramid angle γ |
|
41.9° = angle of the ridge |
Corner angle |
|
Right angle base with angles from 89° 59' to 90° |
Base area |
|
53'065.73m² |
Superficies surface |
|
85'890.69m² |
Pyramid volume |
|
2'592'968.43m³ including the rock core. This would be a cube with a length of 137.38m. Probable volume of stones used: 2'583'283m³ [1] or 2'326'501m³ [2]. |
Alignment |
|
Exactly to the north (deviation only 2' 28') |
Latitude and longitude |
|
N 29° 58’ 44.3830” latitude and E 31° 07’ 57.0194” longitude [5] |
Altitude |
|
The base of the pyramid of Khufu lies about 60m above sea level, so the tip of the pyramid used to be on 206m above sea level [6]. |
Alignment of the pyramids and controlling the shape of the pyramid (north-south alignment etc.)
Dimensions of the pyramid of Khufu in Egyptian Royal Cubits
 |
Length (a) |
|
440 Royal Cubits |
Height (h) |
|
280 Royal Cubits |
Height of the lateral surface (c) |
|
356 Royal Cubits (356.09) |
Diagonal (d) |
|
622.25 Royal Cubits |
Ridge (g) |
|
418.56 Royal Cubits |
Pyramid angle α |
|
51.843° |
Pyramid angle β |
|
58.3° |
Pyramid angle γ |
|
41.9° |
Corner angle |
|
90° |
It is suggested, that the Egyptians used a right angled triangle to determinate the angle of inclination of the pyramid, using the numbers a=11 and b=14 with c=17.8 (or a=22 - b=28 - c= 35.6). This determines a so called seked of 5½ palms.
Alignment of the pyramids and controlling the shape of the pyramid (seked)
Sources
[1] M. Lehner The Complete Pyramids of Egypt [2] G. Goyon Die Cheops-Pyramide [3] R. Stadelmann Die grossen Pyramiden von Giza [4] F. Abitz Der Bau der grossen Pyramide mit einem Schrägaufzug [5] GPS-coordinates of a brass disk on top of the pyramid of Khufu, Giza Plateau Mapping Project (GPMP) [6] Maps of the Giza Plateau Mapping Project show the altitude as 60m [7] D. Arnold Building in Egypt
* Dates according to conventional Egyptian chronology are used in this website. These are based on several list of the dynasties of pharaohs, for example the Aegyptiaca of Manetho of Sebennytos.
https://www.cheops-pyramide.ch/khufu-pyramid/khufu-numbers.html |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 576 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
72. The Egyptian Royal Cubit, the Inch, the Metre, and 254
Updated: Apr 16, 2024
A centimetre is 2.54 inches. At Giza, the number 254 is found as a factor which links various linear dimensions. What does it mean to multiply or divide a linear measure by 254? What does it mean to convert inches to metres, or vice versa?
254 is not the only factor that links the key dimensions at Giza, but it is a common theme. The other factors seem to be based in geometry (such as π , √3), and astronomy (such as 223, 235 and 29.53059).
As 29.53059 x 4/3 inches are close to 10 000 / 254 inches, as are 365.242199 / 354.36708 x 100 / 2.61803 inches, they can be used almost interchangeably to interpret the dimensions at Giza.
10000 / 254 = 39.3700787402
29.53059 x 4/3 = 39.37412
365.242199 / 354.36708 x 100 / 2.61803 = 39.368871
The number 254 is linked to both astronomy and geometry. It is linked to pi, to Phi squared, and to the solar and lunar years, as well as being the number of sidereal months in a Metonic period.
When linear dimensions at Giza are multiplied or divided by 254, it's not necessarily that in one place inches were used and in another metres were used. The metre and the inch can both be said to co-exist at Giza, and even if the metre hadn't appeared in the 18th century it would still appear at Giza. But the use of 254 could in fact be a reference to the ratio between the solar and lunar years combined with Phi squared, or to pi divided by the mean number of lunations in a year.
If we think of possible links between the metre, the inch and the Egyptian royal cubit, the number 254 also makes an appearance, since 2.54 cm are an inch. Converting between inches and metres allows us to see ways of thinking about the Egyptian royal cubit, in relation to geometry and astronomy.
The links between these three units, inch, metre and cubit, and to astronomy and geometry, may hint at something of the symbolic and religious significance of the cubit in ancient Egyptian cosmology and astronomy. It could also explain some of the enduring appeal of the metre and the inch.
Another interesting connection to be made to the number 254 is that, as Howard Crowhurst points out in his book Carnac the Alignments, there are 127 kerb stones around the base of Knowth, in Ireland.
127 is a major prime number (...) and as such is a mirror of the fundamental prime number, One. But it is also half of 254 which is the number of lunar orbits in the 19 year Metonic cycle which also counts 235 full moons. The exact relationship between the metre length and the foot is also to be found through this number since 1 inch = 2.54 cm. Also a right angled triangle with a hypotenuse of 254 m and a base of 235 m has a third side measuring 100.0037 x √10 feet. (1)
The presence of the number 127 in Ireland seems to suggest a link to the repeated presence of 254 at Giza. The 127 stones at Knowth also suggest we should take the inch - metre connection seriously when analysing ancient sites.
https://www.mercurialpathways.com/post/72-the-egyptian-royal-cubit |
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 577 di 584 di questo argomento |
|

72. The Egyptian Royal Cubit, the Inch, the Metre, and 254
Updated: Apr 16, 2024
A centimetre is 2.54 inches. At Giza, the number 254 is found as a factor which links various linear dimensions. What does it mean to multiply or divide a linear measure by 254? What does it mean to convert inches to metres, or vice versa?
254 is not the only factor that links the key dimensions at Giza, but it is a common theme. The other factors seem to be based in geometry (such as π , √3), and astronomy (such as 223, 235 and 29.53059).
As 29.53059 x 4/3 inches are close to 10 000 / 254 inches, as are 365.242199 / 354.36708 x 100 / 2.61803 inches, they can be used almost interchangeably to interpret the dimensions at Giza.
10000 / 254 = 39.3700787402
29.53059 x 4/3 = 39.37412
365.242199 / 354.36708 x 100 / 2.61803 = 39.368871
The number 254 is linked to both astronomy and geometry. It is linked to pi, to Phi squared, and to the solar and lunar years, as well as being the number of sidereal months in a Metonic period.
When linear dimensions at Giza are multiplied or divided by 254, it's not necessarily that in one place inches were used and in another metres were used. The metre and the inch can both be said to co-exist at Giza, and even if the metre hadn't appeared in the 18th century it would still appear at Giza. But the use of 254 could in fact be a reference to the ratio between the solar and lunar years combined with Phi squared, or to pi divided by the mean number of lunations in a year.
If we think of possible links between the metre, the inch and the Egyptian royal cubit, the number 254 also makes an appearance, since 2.54 cm are an inch. Converting between inches and metres allows us to see ways of thinking about the Egyptian royal cubit, in relation to geometry and astronomy.
The links between these three units, inch, metre and cubit, and to astronomy and geometry, may hint at something of the symbolic and religious significance of the cubit in ancient Egyptian cosmology and astronomy. It could also explain some of the enduring appeal of the metre and the inch.
Another interesting connection to be made to the number 254 is that, as Howard Crowhurst points out in his book Carnac the Alignments, there are 127 kerb stones around the base of Knowth, in Ireland.
127 is a major prime number (...) and as such is a mirror of the fundamental prime number, One. But it is also half of 254 which is the number of lunar orbits in the 19 year Metonic cycle which also counts 235 full moons. The exact relationship between the metre length and the foot is also to be found through this number since 1 inch = 2.54 cm. Also a right angled triangle with a hypotenuse of 254 m and a base of 235 m has a third side measuring 100.0037 x √10 feet. (1)
The presence of the number 127 in Ireland seems to suggest a link to the repeated presence of 254 at Giza. The 127 stones at Knowth also suggest we should take the inch - metre connection seriously when analysing ancient sites.
https://www.mercurialpathways.com/post/72-the-egyptian-royal-cubit
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 578 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 579 di 584 di questo argomento |
|






IP: Logged
|
RiverDawg47 Knowflake
Posts: 71 From: Needles, CA, USA Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted February 01, 2011 02:54 PM




|
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 580 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 581 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 582 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 583 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 584 di 584 di questo argomento |
|
|
|
Primo
Precedente
570 a 584 de 584
Successivo
Ultimo
|
|
|
|
©2025 - Gabitos - Tutti i diritti riservati | |
|
|