Home  |  Contact  

Email:

Password:

Sign Up Now!

Forgot your password?

DESENMASCARANDO LAS FALSAS DOCTRINAS
 
What’s New
  Join Now
  Message Board 
  Image Gallery 
 Files and Documents 
 Polls and Test 
  Member List
 YHWH (DIOS PADRE) EL UNICO DIOS 
 JESUCRISTO NUESTRO MESIAS JUDIO 
 LOS DIEZ MANDAMIENTOS DE LA BIBLIA 
 MEJORE SU CARACTER Y SU VIDA 
 YOU TUBE-MAOR BA OLAM-LINKS 
 YOU TUBE-MAOR BA OLAM-LINKS II 
 BIBLIAS/CONCORDANCIA/LIBROS 
 MAYOR ENEMIGO DEL HOMBRE ES UNO MISMO 
 ¿LA TORA ES MACHISTA? -MENSAJE ESOTERICO Y EXOTERICO 
 ¿ES INMORTAL EL ALMA?- FALACIA DE LA ENCARNACION Y REENCARNACION 
 EL ISLAM TIENE ORIGEN UNITARIO ADOPCIONISTA 
 ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO-ESTUDIO POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO II-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO III-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 CRISTO NO TUVO PREEXISTENCIA 
 ¿QUE ES EL ESPIRITU SANTO? 
 
 
  Tools
 
MATEMATICAS: ¿CUAL ES EL VERDADERO VALOR DE PI? ¿CUAL ES SU RELACION CON PHI? - MISTERIO
Choose another message board
Previous subject  Next subject
Reply  Message 1 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999  (Original message) Sent: 19/02/2016 01:17
 

Did you know the great pyramid is perfect, but they say the top of the pyramid is not in the middle of the square base and has an error of a quarter of a inch lol . but that is because the modern scientists has calculate wrong the Pi number. 
Pi or π is a mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space; this is the same value as the ratio of a circle's area to the square of its radius. It is approximately equal to 3.14159 in the usual decimal notation (see the table for its representation in some other bases). π is one of the most important mathematical and physical constants: many formulae from mathematics, science, and engineering involve π.
 Circumference = π × diameter

 Area of the circle = π × area of the shaded square

Calculating Pi number 
π can be empirically estimated by drawing a large circle, then measuring its diameter and circumference and dividing the circumference by the diameter. Another geometry-based approach, due to Archimedes,[19] is to calculate the perimeter, Pn , of a regular polygon with n sides circumscribed around a circle with diameter d. Then 

That is, the more sides the polygon has, the closer the approximation approaches π. Archimedes determined the accuracy of this approach by comparing the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon with the perimeter of a regular polygon with the same number of sides inscribed inside the circle. Using a polygon with 96 sides, he computed the fractional range: 


I will say only that his ARCHIMEDES axiom (287-212 BC) resulting from the conclusion that seems logical in our OLD thinking and reference, namely that a circle can be compared and even overlapped with circumscribed polygon with infinite number of sides is not accurate! 


The modern scientist will say to you if you give them the TRUE PI NUMBER "Archimedes established margin that included PI: between 3.1408 (223/71) and 3.1428 (22 / 7), so the your result are not included in this interval, so that is false!"

For the moment all the guys out there uses PI=3.1415(....)
but the true Pi number is 3,1446(...) go and measure on terrain!!! practical !!! 

PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(...)) = 3.14460550981492(...) !!! 
 The Golden Ratio!!! 

Facts:
According to the true pi number the diameter of the Large Hadron Collider is smaller with 8.13 meters!
According to the true pi number the GREAT PYRAMID IS P.E.R.F.E.C.T.!!!!!!!
According to the true pi number N.A.S.A. is using the true PI number. lol
According to the true pi number the humans will be able to build more perfect buildings (and durable ffs!!!)
ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL WILL BE UPGRADED AND MORE EFFICIENT!!! and a little bigger in diameter )

Last edited by fr0sty; 22-05-2009 at 05:27 PM.
 
 
188
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:11
17
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:08
54
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:05
432
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:03
27
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:58
222
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:57
69
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:56
279
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:56
17
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:55
7
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:50
123
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:31
96
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:31
23
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:30
103
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:30
29
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:29
26
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:29
77
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:28
98
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:28
75
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:27
548
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:23
11
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:22
30
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:20
138
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:16
176
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:12
28
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:04
3
BARILOCHENSE6999 14/02/2016 16:56
110
BARILOCHENSE6999 14/02/2016 16:53
 


First  Previous  8 to 22 of 37  Next   Last 
Reply  Message 8 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 01:52

Reply  Message 9 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 01:59

Reply  Message 10 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 02:24

Reply  Message 11 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 02:33
 
Pi is vaguely described as "(perfect) circle's circumference to its diameter". 

sqrt(16/(lim_(n->infinity) F_(n+1)/F_n)) = sqrt(16/((sqrt(5)+1)/2)) = 4/sqrt(phi) = approx 
3.1446055110296931442782343433 718357180924882313508929506596 .. 
It is based on the fundamental Fibonacci sequence (the F there is Fibonacci number).


Why Pi = 3.141 .. instead of 3.144?, page 2

Última edición por Sion 2012; 13-oct-2012 a las 02:16
 

Reply  Message 12 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 02:42
El valor de PI no es un invento.
Es el resultado de su definición original.



Es obvio que si se desarrolla el perímetro de una figura geométrica regular de n lados, el perímetro tenderá a acercarse al valor de PI a medida que el número de lados aumenta. De esa forma, PI puede definirse como el siguiente límite



Esto es, el valor del perímetro al que tiende un polígono regular cuando el número de lados tiende a infinito.

Esto no nos provee de un valor directo, pero sí nos provee de un mecanismo para calcular PI con una aproximación tan perfecta como queramos.
Del límite anterior se deduce el siguiente algoritmo de cálculo.


Y así es como puede determinarse X cifras de PI mediante cálculos actuales en un ordenador.

Lo digo por si a alguno se creía que el valor de PI se le había ocurrido al tipo de turno y lo sentenció al mundo mundial.

Reply  Message 13 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 02:44

Reply  Message 14 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 03:06
Quote:
Originally Posted by fr0sty View Post

Did you know the great pyramid is perfect, but they say the top of the pyramid is not in the middle of the square base and has an error of a quarter of a inch lol . but that is because the modern scientists has calculate wrong the Pi number. 
Pi or π is a mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space; this is the same value as the ratio of a circle's area to the square of its radius. It is approximately equal to 3.14159 in the usual decimal notation (see the table for its representation in some other bases). π is one of the most important mathematical and physical constants: many formulae from mathematics, science, and engineering involve π.
 Circumference = π × diameter

 Area of the circle = π × area of the shaded square

Calculating Pi number 
π can be empirically estimated by drawing a large circle, then measuring its diameter and circumference and dividing the circumference by the diameter. Another geometry-based approach, due to Archimedes,[19] is to calculate the perimeter, Pn , of a regular polygon with n sides circumscribed around a circle with diameter d. Then 

That is, the more sides the polygon has, the closer the approximation approaches π. Archimedes determined the accuracy of this approach by comparing the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon with the perimeter of a regular polygon with the same number of sides inscribed inside the circle. Using a polygon with 96 sides, he computed the fractional range: 


I will say only that his ARCHIMEDES axiom (287-212 BC) resulting from the conclusion that seems logical in our OLD thinking and reference, namely that a circle can be compared and even overlapped with circumscribed polygon with infinite number of sides is not accurate! 


The modern scientist will say to you if you give them the TRUE PI NUMBER "Archimedes established margin that included PI: between 3.1408 (223/71) and 3.1428 (22 / 7), so the your result are not included in this interval, so that is false!"

For the moment all the guys out there uses PI=3.1415(....)
but the true Pi number is 3,1446(...) go and measure on terrain!!! practical !!! 

PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(...)) = 3.14460550981492(...) !!! 
 The Golden Ratio!!! 

Facts:
According to the true pi number the diameter of the Large Hadron Collider is smaller with 8.13 meters!
According to the true pi number the GREAT PYRAMID IS P.E.R.F.E.C.T.!!!!!!!
According to the true pi number N.A.S.A. is using the true PI number. lol
According to the true pi number the humans will be able to build more perfect buildings (and durable ffs!!!)
ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL WILL BE UPGRADED AND MORE EFFICIENT!!! and a little bigger in diameter )
Correction: PI=4/sqrt(PHI)=3.144605511029693144(...)...without doubt...MEASURED!...But, pay attention, please, about the"PARADOX OF THE SMALL ANGLES"up to sqrt[sqrt(89)]=3.071478656(...) sexag.deg. I'll explain you, later!
See you, please: http://quadrature.ro 

V L A H S T A R
Mircea-Mugurel Serban

Last edited by vlahstar; 18-06-2009 at 09:21 AM. Reason: Completion!

Reply  Message 15 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 03:23
 
Pi has been on my mind lately. 

3.14159265358979323846264338327950288
;_48955749387755814374637143686622432
;__3384266986495459315253482874135935
;___659285541551511451382657648938827
;____22438489512789491435275265587686
;_____4821544913199445938184638431763
;______356261125666151143437476145393
;_______85745684174591269475974595882
;________4262872315112411538861662192
;_________635424784568345143289635668
;__________95926437398262371322827419
;___________5574829332413645813242677
;____________183244713782838782481753
;_____________93594236435476435989736
;______________3883585938317251199717
;_______________214984476918167888675
;________________37761539919175432862
;_________________1856255566751581968
;__________________952495174278434419
;___________________57227861319472677
;____________________3575412566181753
;_____________________862679528989736
;______________________57422798877585
;_______________________3792998753873
;________________________113332958758
;_________________________25824498621
;__________________________7683776356
;___________________________436428274
;____________________________74819294
;_____________________________2133559
;______________________________369511
;_______________________________99567
;________________________________9529
;_________________________________577
;__________________________________31
;___________________________________4

I've condensed up to 36 numbers of Pi, each bolded number being the prime of Pi up to its respective row.

frequency: 1(3/36); 2(4); 3(8); 4(5); 5(4); 6(2); 7(2); 8(2); 9(5)

343624384695193231953853127472399534

Is Pi equivalent to all prime numbers?
__________________
M1 Creations blog

Last edited by mane; 08-10-2009 at 06:01 AM.

Reply  Message 16 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 23:40
57
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:44
281
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:42
223
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:41
71
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:38
43
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:32
2
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:25
19
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:23
99
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:20
193
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:15
15
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:08
28
BARILOCHENSE6999 19/02/2016 00:00
95
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 23:55
9
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 23:39
102
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 23:28
62
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 23:28
3
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 23:22
18
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:56
433
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:54
128
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:26
188
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:11
54
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 22:05
17
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:55
7
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:50
123
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:31
96
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:31
23
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:30
103
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:30
29
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:29
26
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:29
77
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:28
98
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:28
75
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:27
548
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:23
11
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:22
30
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:20
138
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:16
176
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:12
28
BARILOCHENSE6999 18/02/2016 21:04

Reply  Message 17 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 20/02/2016 00:08
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximumgravity1 View Post
Hey fr0sty,

Regarding the Ark of the Covenant comments, there are many illogical explanations regarding the "sarcophagus" in the Kings Chamber, among other things. I have my own explanations, but will reserve them for now. I do find it interesting that the Ark would fit in there. It really makes perfect sense to me. I find one of the most amazing things about the Pyramids is until this last century, man could not fathom a building being that tall. There was no such way to build a building that big. Ironically, the tallest - the World Trade Center Towers, didn't even make it 100 years. I live in a house that is about 110 years old, and it is constantly in need of maintenance, and "major" structural repairs. Yet the pyramids have remained in perfect alignment and structural integrity for well over 4000 years. I think it really shows how insignificant our modern thought really is.

Interesting info regarding Pi. I had seen a documentary on TV about 15 years ago that discussed this in some detail regarding the Pyramid. The final conclusion pretty much supports your conclusions. They estimated that the same mathematics would be reached by taking a wheel, and walking the side of the pyramid, then basically, doubling that for the height. Apparently, the anomaly works itself into that equation, to make it differ from the mathematical ideal. 

For the rest of what you post - I really have no idea what you are trying to say. The only words I understood was North Star.

I have also read a few different books regarding "Pyramid Mathematics". It makes me believe that we are missing something with our conventional math. In reading your post, I am even more convinced of it. LOL 

I have also found that geometric structures do not translate in real life to what our mathematical models suggest. Your diamond structure is a prime example. I found this out building a pyramid out of smaller pyramids and tetrahedrons. I basically stumbled across Pascal's Pyramid (at least as representedby this page). The only difference, is the way it is drawn on that website is a bit confusing, is more of a cross-section of the octahedron, instead of a general octahedron shape that you would build. This looks like someone took a core sample. However, the important thing is it requires a combination of tetrahedron and pyramids to build, tetrahedrons alone are only an optical illusion when the pyramid is rotated. I discovered this with many shapes we represent geometrically. They are not true geometric shapes - just optical illusions of viewing from a rotated angle. I will build a model and post as an explanation if anyone is interested. I have one now, but all pyramids and tetrahedron are white, so it is difficult to understand visually where the tetrahedrons begin and end.
When you take the number Pi = 3,1446(...) THE NUMBER PHI OR GOLDEN CUT...GOLDEN MEAN...GOLDEN RATIO...GOLDEN NUMBER...GOLDEN SECTION is everywhere  and everything is simplified and intuitive. Please disable the chaos theory rofl!!!

Last edited by fr0sty; 23-05-2009 at 05:09 PM.
 

Reply  Message 18 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 12/03/2016 01:15

Reply  Message 19 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 12/03/2016 01:29

Reply  Message 20 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 23/04/2016 18:06
 

 
Reply  Message 64 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 22/04/2016 13:22

 
Reply  Message 28 of 33 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 14/04/2016 22:56

 
Reply  Message 29 of 33 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 14/04/2016 22:58

 
Reply  Message 30 of 33 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 15/04/2016 20:58


Reply  Message 31 of 33 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/04/2016 22:31


Reply  Message 32 of 33 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 21/04/2016 11:44
 
 
NOTEN LA IMPRESIONANTE RELACION DE LA GRAN PIRAMIDE CON EL OCTOGONO DEL VATICANO EN EL MARCO A LA RELACION DE LA SUPERFICIE EN EL CONTEXTO A UN CUADRADO DE LADO 2.
 
SUPERFICIE CUADRADO=2*2=8 (AQUI ESTA LA CLAVE MATEMATICA DEL "EXPERIMENTO FILADELFIA")

Reply  Message 21 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 30/05/2021 15:01


Reply  Message 22 of 37 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 30/05/2021 18:29



First  Previous  8 a 22 de 37  Next   Last 
Previous subject  Next subject
 
©2024 - Gabitos - All rights reserved