Page principale  |  Contacte  

Adresse mail:

Mot de Passe:

Enrégistrer maintenant!

Mot de passe oublié?

DESENMASCARANDO LAS FALSAS DOCTRINAS
 
Nouveautés
  Rejoindre maintenant
  Rubrique de messages 
  Galérie des images 
 Archives et documents 
 Recherches et tests 
  Liste de participants
 YHWH (DIOS PADRE) EL UNICO DIOS 
 JESUCRISTO NUESTRO MESIAS JUDIO 
 LOS DIEZ MANDAMIENTOS DE LA BIBLIA 
 MEJORE SU CARACTER Y SU VIDA 
 YOU TUBE-MAOR BA OLAM-LINKS 
 YOU TUBE-MAOR BA OLAM-LINKS II 
 BIBLIAS/CONCORDANCIA/LIBROS 
 MAYOR ENEMIGO DEL HOMBRE ES UNO MISMO 
 ¿LA TORA ES MACHISTA? -MENSAJE ESOTERICO Y EXOTERICO 
 ¿ES INMORTAL EL ALMA?- FALACIA DE LA ENCARNACION Y REENCARNACION 
 EL ISLAM TIENE ORIGEN UNITARIO ADOPCIONISTA 
 ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO-ESTUDIO POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO II-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO III-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 CRISTO NO TUVO PREEXISTENCIA 
 ¿QUE ES EL ESPIRITU SANTO? 
 
 
  Outils
 
MATEMATICAS: VORTEX BASED MATHEMATICS BY MARKO RODIN
Choisir un autre rubrique de messages
Thème précédent  Thème suivant
Réponse  Message 1 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999  (message original) Envoyé: 13/02/2016 15:29


Premier  Précédent  7 à 21 de 81  Suivant   Dernier 
Réponse  Message 7 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 14/02/2016 16:21

Réponse  Message 8 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 14/02/2016 16:25

Réponse  Message 9 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 14/02/2016 16:32

Réponse  Message 10 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 14/02/2016 16:33

Réponse  Message 11 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 14/02/2016 17:13

Réponse  Message 12 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 19/02/2016 00:07
Quote:

 

One very unusual feature of the Great Pyramid is the concavity of its four faces, which makes the monument an 8-sided figure, rather than 4-sided like most of the pyramids. In other words, the four sides are hollowed to the inside. This concavity is executed to such an extraordinary degree of precision as to complement the mystery of the structure. From any ground position, it is invisible to the naked eye and only noticed from the air; indeed it was discovered by accident by a British air force pilot flying over the Giza Plateau in 1940 during the Spring Equinox (21 March). He did not miss had the opportunity and took a photograph. Petrie had already voiced a similar observation when he noticed a hollowing in the core masonry in the centre of each face such that the courses of the core had dips of as much as 1®. The concavity was presumably to prevent the casing stones from sliding, i.e. to better bond the nucleus to the casing. Another possibility was an aesthetic one: concave faces are more pleasing to the eye. The value of Phi, which is equal to the secant of the face angle of the inner triangle, is the same as the ratio between the slant height of the pyramid and half its base-length and this applies to every one of the 8 right-angle triangular faces. Each of the 8- sided faces confirms with the Golden Ratio proportion so that it is inscribed into a Golden Rectang le in which the height/base = Phi. 

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2008/890/heritage.htm 



 
click for larger image: http://www.math.nmsu.edu/~breakingaway/Lessons/candybaskets1/candybaskets_fig2.jpg 

Thus it is revealed that the Maltese Cross and the Great Pyramid have a subtle, sublime relationship, that goes back to when this pyramid was built. 
>> http://www.math.nmsu.edu/~breakingaway/Lessons/candybaskets1/candybaskets.html 

Also I just noticed another coincidence to go along with all of the other 'coincidences' that I continue to observe as I pull back the archetypal veils, a language unto itself. 

 
The center 9 squares are comprised of the numbers 157. 

I was born July 3, 1957.
 
Okay that is the first coincidence 9 + 157 = 1957. 
Correct? 

Now add up the value of all 9 squares containing the numbers 157. 
I arrive at 37. 
Those who know their gematria know how important 37 is.
 

But recall I was born on the 3rd of July = 37 
WTF??? 

It gets even more bizarre. 
(for me...) 
Really it does. 
My facts, based on my life these past 5 years is stranger than Dan Brown fiction. 

Watch this clip of Bill Maher from his film 'Religulous' 
http://2012forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=192198#p192198 

see what I mean? 
bizarre I say... 

namaste 

p.s. 
still not convinced that I was awoken and that the Maltese Cross forms a part of my own personal legacy in the here and now...? 

 

Badge 1258 

The Maltese Cross is associated internationally with firefighters. 
I did not quite complete 25 years. 
I fell short. 

Instead my focus changed to the number '25' and Marko Rodin's cosmic blender that he associates with '25' 

namaste

_________________
KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory 
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…” 
-Albert Einsteinhttp://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5698

Réponse  Message 13 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 19/02/2016 00:11
 

Marko Rodin's 25 Cosmic Blender 
Does it all come back to the Great Pyramid?
 

 

Quote:
 

FIG. 21.-GEOME'T'RICAL DESIGNS ON PRE-SCANDINAVIAN PIECES. 
Key-Fret-(1) Maughold 65. Spirals-(2) Rushen 50; (3) Michael 64; (4) Maughold 66; (5) Conchan 62. Triquetras--(6) Rushen 50; (7) Maughold 25 ; (Cool Santon 68; (9, 10) Lezayre 53; (11, 21) Maughold 51. Fourfold Rings--(12) Rushen 5o; (13) Lezayre 53; (14) Braddan 56; (15) same, as intended; (16) Lezayre 53 (with ring). Diagonal Rings Interlaced-(I7, 1Cool Maughold 52; (19, 22) Lonan 57; (20) Conchan 61. 
http://www.isle-of-man.com/manxnotebook/fulltext/mc1907/p015.htm


I see a 2-5 fret pattern listed asKey-Fret-(1) 

St. Brigid's Cross is found in the heart of images (9) (10) (12) (13) (15) (16) (17) (18 ) (19) (22) 

 

St Brigid's Cross 

Swastika can be clearly seen in (19) (22) 

namaste

_________________
KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory 
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…” 
-Albert Einstein

Réponse  Message 14 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 19/02/2016 00:15
 
Which TORUS modEL is best? 

 

 

Marko Rodin and the Cross of the Ilu? 
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1058611542 

 

BBL 

BiBLE = BaBeL = BaB-iLu = Gate of God = Cross of Ilu = 369 = 4 axis of symmetry 

namaste

_________________
KEY 528=Swastika=ancient Spherical Standing Wave Theory 
“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…” 
-Albert Einstein
 

Réponse  Message 15 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 19/02/2016 00:35

Réponse  Message 16 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 19/02/2016 00:37
 
It's the dynamics alone! Don't you see? What we call things are just movements, vibrations. But the vibration is omni-directional. We see something when it divides itself and creates a boundary.

It's like a pool full of water, in order to define "this" water from "that" water, because it's homogeneous, it has to "move through itself", and it does this in a vortex, to define what is being pulled inside the vortex and what isn't.

In this case we are talking about energy. Energy is homogeneous, as is "space". Space is full of energy and energy is full of space! In order for it to divide itself form itself is uses this dynamic that I am describing, to define a boundary. This is what vibrations are, they are not 2D jiggles up and down, they are the result of a vortex, toroidial pinch! These dynamics exsist at all scales like a fractal, it doesn't matter where you are it's all the centre, it's all "the same" and yet infinite.

Paradox is not "error" or "wrong" it is the way things really are outside of your subjective awaerness. If you can't accept paradox nothing will ever make sense......
 

Réponse  Message 17 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 19/02/2016 00:55
 

Did you know the great pyramid is perfect, but they say the top of the pyramid is not in the middle of the square base and has an error of a quarter of a inch lol . but that is because the modern scientists has calculate wrong the Pi number. 
Pi or π is a mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space; this is the same value as the ratio of a circle's area to the square of its radius. It is approximately equal to 3.14159 in the usual decimal notation (see the table for its representation in some other bases). π is one of the most important mathematical and physical constants: many formulae from mathematics, science, and engineering involve π.
 Circumference = π × diameter

 Area of the circle = π × area of the shaded square

Calculating Pi number 
π can be empirically estimated by drawing a large circle, then measuring its diameter and circumference and dividing the circumference by the diameter. Another geometry-based approach, due to Archimedes,[19] is to calculate the perimeter, Pn , of a regular polygon with n sides circumscribed around a circle with diameter d. Then 

That is, the more sides the polygon has, the closer the approximation approaches π. Archimedes determined the accuracy of this approach by comparing the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon with the perimeter of a regular polygon with the same number of sides inscribed inside the circle. Using a polygon with 96 sides, he computed the fractional range: 


I will say only that his ARCHIMEDES axiom (287-212 BC) resulting from the conclusion that seems logical in our OLD thinking and reference, namely that a circle can be compared and even overlapped with circumscribed polygon with infinite number of sides is not accurate! 


The modern scientist will say to you if you give them the TRUE PI NUMBER "Archimedes established margin that included PI: between 3.1408 (223/71) and 3.1428 (22 / 7), so the your result are not included in this interval, so that is false!"

For the moment all the guys out there uses PI=3.1415(....)
but the true Pi number is 3,1446(...) go and measure on terrain!!! practical !!! 

PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(...)) = 3.14460550981492(...) !!! 
 The Golden Ratio!!! 

Facts:
According to the true pi number the diameter of the Large Hadron Collider is smaller with 8.13 meters!
According to the true pi number the GREAT PYRAMID IS P.E.R.F.E.C.T.!!!!!!!
According to the true pi number N.A.S.A. is using the true PI number. lol
According to the true pi number the humans will be able to build more perfect buildings (and durable ffs!!!)
ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL WILL BE UPGRADED AND MORE EFFICIENT!!! and a little bigger in diameter )

Last edited by fr0sty; 22-05-2009 at 05:27 PM.
 

Réponse  Message 18 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 20/02/2016 00:14
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fr0sty View Post

Did you know the great pyramid is perfect, but they say the top of the pyramid is not in the middle of the square base and has an error of a quarter of a inch lol . but that is because the modern scientists has calculate wrong the Pi number. 
Pi or π is a mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space; this is the same value as the ratio of a circle's area to the square of its radius. It is approximately equal to 3.14159 in the usual decimal notation (see the table for its representation in some other bases). π is one of the most important mathematical and physical constants: many formulae from mathematics, science, and engineering involve π.
 Circumference = π × diameter

 Area of the circle = π × area of the shaded square

Calculating Pi number 
π can be empirically estimated by drawing a large circle, then measuring its diameter and circumference and dividing the circumference by the diameter. Another geometry-based approach, due to Archimedes,[19] is to calculate the perimeter, Pn , of a regular polygon with n sides circumscribed around a circle with diameter d. Then 

That is, the more sides the polygon has, the closer the approximation approaches π. Archimedes determined the accuracy of this approach by comparing the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon with the perimeter of a regular polygon with the same number of sides inscribed inside the circle. Using a polygon with 96 sides, he computed the fractional range: 


I will say only that his ARCHIMEDES axiom (287-212 BC) resulting from the conclusion that seems logical in our OLD thinking and reference, namely that a circle can be compared and even overlapped with circumscribed polygon with infinite number of sides is not accurate! 


The modern scientist will say to you if you give them the TRUE PI NUMBER "Archimedes established margin that included PI: between 3.1408 (223/71) and 3.1428 (22 / 7), so the your result are not included in this interval, so that is false!"

For the moment all the guys out there uses PI=3.1415(....)
but the true Pi number is 3,1446(...) go and measure on terrain!!! practical !!! 

PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(...)) = 3.14460550981492(...) !!! 
 The Golden Ratio!!! 

Facts:
According to the true pi number the diameter of the Large Hadron Collider is smaller with 8.13 meters!
According to the true pi number the GREAT PYRAMID IS P.E.R.F.E.C.T.!!!!!!!
According to the true pi number N.A.S.A. is using the true PI number. lol
According to the true pi number the humans will be able to build more perfect buildings (and durable ffs!!!)
ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL WILL BE UPGRADED AND MORE EFFICIENT!!! and a little bigger in diameter )
Correction: PI=4/sqrt(PHI)=3.144605511029693144(...)...without doubt...MEASURED!...But, pay attention, please, about the"PARADOX OF THE SMALL ANGLES"up to sqrt[sqrt(89)]=3.071478656(...) sexag.deg. I'll explain you, later!
See you, please: http://quadrature.ro 

V L A H S T A R
Mircea-Mugurel Serban

Last edited by vlahstar; 18-06-2009 at 09:21 AM. Reason: Completion!
 

Réponse  Message 19 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 20/02/2016 00:51
 
Somebody earlier compared freemason’s compass/sqare symbol with rodin’s anagram? 
Why not taking this idea further with “unfinished pyramid shape”.
Maybe a new candidate for winding the rodin golden ratio coil?
When I was drawing it my body was shaking like crazy.
It was kind of like automatic writing.. When I was done I started to analyze it.

ps: what 33 degree masons know? 

 

Réponse  Message 20 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 20/02/2016 00:53


I would recommend winding it with the “Twistite”
triple wire, the one Jamie Buturff used for one of his newer coils. Or even better.. twisting the twistite wire even more to reach the “mobius coil” style wire:


Réponse  Message 21 de 81 de ce thème 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Envoyé: 20/02/2016 01:00
 
 
Reply  Message 76 of 76 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/02/2016 21:57
Maximumgravity1, I don't know of any vortex modeling aps as it can be quite complex math, they use the latest super computers to calculate fluid dynamics and even then its not completely accurate modeling.

There are some very simple examples you can play with here if you download the player .http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/se...x=0&submit.y=0

It probably better to just read about how they work, id recommend 
http://www.sciencetoymaker.org/vortex/explore.htm ( this has your bottle example)

and the work of Viktor Schauberger since he did a lot of water related stuff, 
http://evgars.com/shauberg1.htm




Back to the torus's I was always wondering what the mathematical equivalents to the size of the torus was in relation to its ring, aka how big the doughnut hole is and how did the size effect the torus properties.

I didn't realize it but there are several differently names torus's depending on this. Most of the "Marko" coils I've seen are actually called "ring torus's" and I think that's mainly due to the fact that the windings need some space to be wrapped, especially if you have fat fingers 

But check this out, 




Now if you take the horn torus you find the golden triangle 


That image is from a Dr. Shikhirin paper http://www.elastoneering.com/


ps. The plural of torus is actually tori and not torus's but it sounds weird.
 

Last edited by theflow; 06-01-2010 at 02:51 AM.
 


Premier  Précédent  7 a 21 de 81  Suivant   Dernier 
Thème précédent  Thème suivant
 
©2025 - Gabitos - Tous droits réservés