I wanted to start a thread about end to end software development and hear how others approach it in real projects.

For me, “end to end” isn’t just a buzzword. It’s about having one team that can take care of everything: from initial discovery and product strategy, through UX/UI, architecture, implementation, testing, deployment, and long-term support. When this is done right, it saves a lot of time, money, and nerves for the client.

Some things I really like about a true end to end approach:

• One responsible partner instead of five different vendors

• Consistent quality and coding standards across the whole product

• Faster feedback loops between business, design, and engineering

• Easier maintenance and feature growth after the first release

Recently I’ve seen how companies like Zoola build this kind of service into their core model. They don’t just write code – they help define the product, validate ideas, choose the tech stack, set up CI/CD, and then stay with the client to evolve the solution over time. That’s what I personally expect when I hear the phrase “end to end software development”.

I’m curious how you see it:

• Do you prefer one end-to-end vendor or several specialized teams?

• Which stage of the lifecycle is the hardest to integrate smoothly?

• What do you consider the main sign that end to end actually works (business results, speed, quality, something else)?

Would be great to hear your experiences and best practices from both vendor and client sides.