|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 1 di 3 di questo argomento |
|
| Da: katejonson (Messaggio originale) |
Inviato: 27/01/2026 18:26 |
Hello. I need advice on using the DraftOut service. Currently, university requirements for originality of texts are very high, so I am looking for a tool that ensures not only the absence of AI markings, but also high quality of argumentation. Do their materials really contain correct references to primary sources in PDF format? I am also interested in how much the style of the works meets academic standards. Thank you for your thoughts. |
|
|
Primo
Precedente
2 a 3 di 3
Successivo
Ultimo
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 2 di 3 di questo argomento |
|
I recently worked with this service and can say the style is truly on point. It’s not just general phrases; it’s proper academic language with logical transitions. What impressed me most was that the PDF source links are real — I checked a few through Google Scholar, and they actually exist and match the topic. This is a huge plus for argumentation because the text doesn't feel hollow. |
|
|
|
Rispondi |
Messaggio 3 di 3 di questo argomento |
|
I agree, finding a truly reliable evidence base is getting harder, especially with AI starting to hallucinate facts. I've been testing DraftOut for these purposes. So far, it looks interesting because it works with real PDF sources instead of just generating text out of thin air. It helps keep the logic sound and avoid failing AI detection. I wonder if anyone else has come across similar tools for verification? |
|
|
|
|
Argomento precedente