Página principal  |  Contacto  

Correo electrónico:

Contraseña:

Registrarse ahora!

¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?

DESENMASCARANDO LAS FALSAS DOCTRINAS
 
Novedades
  Únete ahora
  Panel de mensajes 
  Galería de imágenes 
 Archivos y documentos 
 Encuestas y Test 
  Lista de Participantes
 YHWH (DIOS PADRE) EL UNICO DIOS 
 JESUCRISTO NUESTRO MESIAS JUDIO 
 LOS DIEZ MANDAMIENTOS DE LA BIBLIA 
 MEJORE SU CARACTER Y SU VIDA 
 YOU TUBE-MAOR BA OLAM-LINKS 
 YOU TUBE-MAOR BA OLAM-LINKS II 
 BIBLIAS/CONCORDANCIA/LIBROS 
 MAYOR ENEMIGO DEL HOMBRE ES UNO MISMO 
 ¿LA TORA ES MACHISTA? -MENSAJE ESOTERICO Y EXOTERICO 
 ¿ES INMORTAL EL ALMA?- FALACIA DE LA ENCARNACION Y REENCARNACION 
 EL ISLAM TIENE ORIGEN UNITARIO ADOPCIONISTA 
 ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO-ESTUDIO POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO II-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 NUEVO TESTAMENTO III-ESTUDIOS POR VERSICULOS 
 CRISTO NO TUVO PREEXISTENCIA 
 ¿QUE ES EL ESPIRITU SANTO? 
 
 
  Herramientas
 
General: PARIS ("LA MADELEINE")=LETTER V=PL. DE LA CONCORDE=OBELISK=WASHINGTON (LUXOR)
Elegir otro panel de mensajes
Tema anterior  Tema siguiente
Respuesta  Mensaje 1 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999  (Mensaje original) Enviado: 14/04/2025 20:48
The Great Pyramid and Jesus - Adept Initiates
Historical Axis at Concorde © French Moments
Pin on RIsas de Instagram
Resultado de imagen para MARTIN MC FLY BABY
Feast of Our Lady of Mercy - Digital Catholic Missionaries (DCM)
The Feast of Our Lady of Ransom | Our Lady of Mercy

Pope Francis delivered a speech too progressive for Obama to give

Pope Francis waves to the crowd from the Speakers Balcony at the US Capitol, September 24, 2015, in Washington, DC.
Pope Francis waves to the crowd from the Speakers Balcony at the US Capitol, September 24, 2015, in Washington, DC. Pool/Getty Images
 

If President Barack Obama had delivered the text of Pope Francis’s speech to Congress Thursday as a State of the Union address, he would have risked being denounced by Republicans as a socialist.

While most Republicans chose not to complain, and Democrats tried not to gloat, Francis’s speech to Congress was stunning in the breadth, depth, and conviction of its progressivism. That might not have been fully and immediately appreciated by everyone in the House chamber because the combination of Francis’s sotto voce delivery and his heavily accented English made it difficult, lawmakers said, to grasp everything he was saying.

But there was no mistaking his thrust. He made detailed arguments for openness to immigrants, addressing the human roots of climate change, closing the gap between the rich and the poor, and ending the death penalty — all of which invigorated the Democrats in the room.

“It was pretty progressive. He had a little right-to-life stuff in it,” Rep. James Clyburn, the third-ranking House Democrat, said as he cracked a smile thinking about how Republicans would receive the speech. “That’s enough for them.”

The pope isn’t going to change many hearts and minds in the badly divided Congress, lawmakers said, but the moment provided a brief respite from political warfare. Several presidential candidates, including Sens. Bernie Sanders, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz, as well as Ben Carson, attended.

Rubio, a Roman Catholic, said in a brief interview that Francis “struck the right tone.” Sanders, a self-described socialist, seemed to like the content even more.

“Pope Francis is clearly one of the important religious and moral leaders not only in the world today but in modern history,” he said in a statement released after the speech. “He forces us to address some of the major issues facing humanity: war, income and wealth inequality, poverty, unemployment, greed, the death penalty and other issues that too many prefer to ignore.”

Democrats were eager enough to present Congress as united that they joined a Republican-led standing ovation when Francis told lawmakers of “our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every state of its development.” Several of them said it was out of respect for the pope. But there was another good reason: It strengthened the perception that the whole speech — most of which they liked — carried unifying themes.

Unity was good for Democrats because the speech favored their policies

Francis was interrupted a few times by whoops from the Democratic side of the chamber — by Steve Cohen, a Jewish Memphis Democrat who got excited about Francis’s mention of the Golden Rule; by New York’s Nydia Velázquez when he called for an end to the death penalty; and by Philadelphia Rep. Chaka Fattah when he mentioned his upcoming visit to that city. The Republicans in the room were a bit more staid. Cruz often appeared unmoved during moments when Rubio, who was sitting nearby, applauded. That was the case when Francis asked whether the greater opportunities sought by past generations of immigrants are “not what we want for our own children?”

It was a home crowd. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) had announced he would boycott the event over climate change, and there was a brief murmur when it became obvious that three conservative Catholic Supreme Court justices — Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas — had not shown up. But it seemed that everyone in attendance just wanted to catch a glimpse of Francis and hear what he had to say.

Big-name guests filed into the public galleries above the House chamber long before the pope’s arrival: Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Rep. Gabby Giffords, mega-donor Tom Steyer, and Carson. House members filled the seats in their chamber, followed by the Senate and four Supreme Court justices. At about a minute past 10 am, Francis strode down the center aisle of the House chamber, clad in his familiar white robe and skullcap.

Lawmakers, who had been admonished not to touch the pope, refrained from trying to shake his hand or pat his back. There was no rush to crowd him the way members of Congress try to get into pictures with the president during the annual State of the Union address. When he got to the end of the aisle, he quietly shook hands with Secretary of State John Kerry and then made his way to the rostrum.

Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the UN, pulled out a baby blue iPhone and began snapping pictures. Though she later took to Twitter to commemorate the moment, Power hadn’t posted any of her photos by midday.

 

For his part, Francis warmed up the audience by describing America as “the land of the free and the home of the brave.” He was slow to move into more politically charged territory but unimpeded when he did. There were 10 standing ovations after his initial greeting, and they were bipartisan.

Francis tackled tough issues at the heart of the US political debate and gently admonished lawmakers to build bridges

At times, Francis seemed to be speaking directly into the headlines and newscasts of the day.

Less than a week after Carson said that America shouldn’t elect a Muslim president, Francis warned that “a delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual freedoms.”

As Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump promises to build a wall between Mexico and the US, and to prevent Syrian refugees from being admitted to America, Francis compared the current refugee crisis to the one that arose in World War II and said that “we the people of this continent are not fearful of foreigners, because most of us were once foreigners.” That drew a standing ovation. Rubio, who has shifted his emphasis on immigration reform over time, leaped to his feet.

And while Democrats continue to bask in this summer’s Supreme Court decision protecting same-sex marriage, the pope said he was concerned that “fundamental relationships are being called into question, as is the very basis of marriage and the family.” The issue that caused the biggest stir before the speech — climate change — factored prominently in Francis’s remarks. He spoke of the human roots of global warming and said, “I am convinced we can make a difference.”

But perhaps the most unexpected run in the speech was an admonishment as gentle as it was clear: Politics is about building bridges, not destroying them. Francis never mentioned the international nuclear nonproliferation deal with Iran by name or the gridlock in American politics, but he seemed to be speak to both matters.

“When countries which have been at odds resume the path of dialogue — a dialogue which may have been interrupted for the most legitimate of reasons — new opportunities open up for all,” he said. “A good political leader is one who, with the interests of all in mind, seizes the moment in a spirit of openness and pragmatism. A good political leader always opts to initiate processes rather than possessing spaces.”

Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Joe Pitts, speaking about the pope’s limited remarks on abortion and same-sex marriage, said he was displeased that Francis had been “unfortunately politically correct.”

For liberals, though, he was simply correct about politics.

 
 
https://www.vox.com/2015/9/24/9393731/pope-francis-speech-progressive-obama
Discover the majestic Place de la Concorde in Paris - French Moments


Primer  Anterior  2 a 9 de 54  Siguiente   Último 
Respuesta  Mensaje 2 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 14/04/2025 20:56

Respuesta  Mensaje 3 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 04:16

Respuesta  Mensaje 4 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 04:24

What you see there is a precise time marker in the form of a walkway attached to the Vegas sphinx, exactly aligned with: 1) the stage in the concert area where the massacre took place, and 2) the December solstice sunrise…

…which also happens to be in conjunction with Saturn this year (Dec 21). (There were many other clues that pointed to December.)

Stargate Wars - Part 1 - Super Torch Ritual

Respuesta  Mensaje 5 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 04:30

Pennsylvania Avenue: Can it be America’s Champs Elysees?

pennsylvania avenue dc

Centuries ago DC’s Pennsylvania Avenue was supposed to be the city’s answer to a location drawing in residents and tourists alike, much like the Champs Elysees in Paris. Now all these years later, the question many area are asking is if the famous avenue can transform itself from an unremarkable and deteriorating location to America’s version of the luxurious Parisian street, renowned for its high-end stores, cafes and theaters.

For decades proponents of making over the DC street have sought out ways to help revitalize the area, making it more colorful and lively. One of the ideas has to do with what to bring in to replace the old J Edgar Hoover Building. The massive, long-standing building that currently houses FBI headquarters is set to be demolished when the bureau moves out to the suburbs. Right now the leading contention is that a mixed-use, high-density development would be the best thing to take its place.

A major development already in the works for the area is the new Trump International Hotel, going in at the site of the Old Post Office Building. Set to open in September 2016, it’s hoped the hotel will bring in more people for shopping and dining to the area.

In addition, two existing mixed-use buildings near the Navy Memorial fountain are set for a second round of renovations. Other possible ideas include loosening the restrictions on commercial activity on nearby sidewalks, allow for things like public art exhibits and cafes plus possibly bringing new life to Freedom Plaza with outdoor events and concerts.

While none of these things are guaranteed to transform Pennsylvania Avenue into Champs Elysees, supporters hope they can make “America’s Main Street” a more beautiful place for visitors and residents, converting the area from merely a symbolic parade route and connection point for the Capitol and White House to a more beautiful destination in the future.


Respuesta  Mensaje 6 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 04:35

Respuesta  Mensaje 7 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 04:50

Respuesta  Mensaje 8 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 04:54

Respuesta  Mensaje 9 de 54 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 04:59

What's in a Name? The State Avenues

in DCby Katherine Brodt

There are fifty-one streets in D.C. named for every state and Puerto Rico. But, admittedly, not all state avenues are created equal. Some are long, vital roadways through our city. Others are historic and prominent—the location of our country’s most important events. And some are…well, a bit hard to find. Admit it: you probably couldn’t point to all of them on a city map. So why are some state avenues more prominent than others? Is there any method to the naming madness?

Early map of DC showing the diagonal avenues named for states
Pierre L'Enfant and Andrew Ellicott's original plans for Washington, D.C., showing the diagonal state avenues cutting across the grid. (Source: Library of Congress)

In his designs for the new capital city, Pierre L’Enfant planned a logical, well-organized grid system of streets. As we know, most of these streets follow numerical and alphabetical patterns—so, ideally, it’s hard to get lost when walking the D.C. blocks. But L’Enfant also planned a series of diagonal avenues—modeled after the Champs Élysées in Paris—that cut through the grid, all meeting and intersecting at the Capitol building.[1] These avenues were meant to ease traffic, encourage growth to the city’s outer regions, and connect the District with outlying towns in Maryland and Virginia.[2] Instead of numbers and letters, they would carry the names of the thirteen states.

Historians aren’t really sure how city planners chose to name these important new roads, but some certainly got better placement than others. Pennsylvania, for example, lent its name to one of the most important new avenues: the one connecting the Capitol to the Presidential Mansion, offering clear views of both seats of power. Certainly, Pennsylvania was an important colony—especially during the Revolution, when it hosted the Continental Congresses. It was also home to the country’s first national capital: Philadelphia. One theory suggests that the Avenue’s name actually honors the location of the former capital city. It might also appease Pennsylvanians after the capital’s removal to Washington—now the city’s most important processional street would carry their name.[3]

However, it’s far more likely that the name is more coincidental. The local historian Frederick Fishback, writing in 1917, explains that “the name of Pennsylvania, because it was the central one of the original thirteen states, was most appropriately given to this thoroughfare in the center of the city.”[4] In this case, “central” doesn’t mean “most important”—it refers to Pennsylvania’s location in the center of the colonial map. As it turns out, L’Enfant planned to organize the state avenues just as logically as the other streets. The mid-Atlantic states—Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland—could find their respective avenues in the center of the city. To their north ran the avenues named for the New England states, like Massachusetts and Connecticut. To their south were—you guessed it—the avenues named for the southern states, like Virginia and Georgia.

But this logical system didn’t last. As the city and country expanded, new streets in Washington carried the names of the new states—though in no particular pattern. States were being added so sporadically that city planners couldn’t really stick to the geographically-organized plan. And within the city boundaries, there really wasn’t enough room for every state to have its broad, diagonal avenue. In 1890, the road that established the District’s northernmost border—the aptly named Boundary Road—got a name change to reflect the growing city’s needs. Although north of city center, this confusing, meandering road is now known as Florida Avenue.

Photograph of Senator Augustus Bacon outside the Capitol building
Senator Augustus Octavius Bacon of Georgia, who really wanted something better for his state's avenue. (Source: Library of Congress via Wikimedia Commons)

Of course, some states—perhaps jealous of Pennsylvania’s prime avenue—became offended by the small size or perceived unimportance of their respective avenues. In 1908, “the logical system of avenue nomenclature was unfortunately changed” when Augustus Octavius Bacon, a senator from Georgia, lobbied to change the location of his state’s avenue to a more well-known, trafficked route to towns in Maryland.[5] His proposal turned out to be unpopular—residents of the District were “unanimously opposed” to any name change, especially since “the name Georgia Avenue had been given to that thoroughfare more than a hundred years ago by the founders of this city.”[6] Bacon eventually won his suit, however, and the former Brightwood Avenue in Northwest became Georgia Avenue. The former Georgia Avenue is now Potomac Avenue.

All in all, though, there doesn’t seem to be a precise naming process for Washington’s state avenues. Though organized at first, the avenues are now spread all over the city, regardless of their position on the national map. And don’t worry: the size of your home state’s avenue doesn’t really have anything to do with that state’s importance to the country, either. Some states just got lucky—or cared way too much.

https://boundarystones.weta.org/2020/09/23/whats-name-state-avenues


Primer  Anterior  2 a 9 de 54  Siguiente   Último 
Tema anterior  Tema siguiente
 
©2025 - Gabitos - Todos los derechos reservados