Originally Posted by fr0sty 

Did you know the great pyramid is perfect, but they say the top of the pyramid is not in the middle of the square base and has an error of a quarter of a inch lol . but that is because the modern scientists has calculate wrong the Pi number. 
Pi or π is a mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean space; this is the same value as the ratio of a circle's area to the square of its radius. It is approximately equal to 3.14159 in the usual decimal notation (see the table for its representation in some other bases). π is one of the most important mathematical and physical constants: many formulae from mathematics, science, and engineering involve π.
 Circumference = π × diameter

 Area of the circle = π × area of the shaded square

Calculating Pi number 
π can be empirically estimated by drawing a large circle, then measuring its diameter and circumference and dividing the circumference by the diameter. Another geometry-based approach, due to Archimedes,[19] is to calculate the perimeter, Pn , of a regular polygon with n sides circumscribed around a circle with diameter d. Then 

That is, the more sides the polygon has, the closer the approximation approaches π. Archimedes determined the accuracy of this approach by comparing the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon with the perimeter of a regular polygon with the same number of sides inscribed inside the circle. Using a polygon with 96 sides, he computed the fractional range: 


I will say only that his ARCHIMEDES axiom (287-212 BC) resulting from the conclusion that seems logical in our OLD thinking and reference, namely that a circle can be compared and even overlapped with circumscribed polygon with infinite number of sides is not accurate! 


The modern scientist will say to you if you give them the TRUE PI NUMBER "Archimedes established margin that included PI: between 3.1408 (223/71) and 3.1428 (22 / 7), so the your result are not included in this interval, so that is false!"

For the moment all the guys out there uses PI=3.1415(....)
but the true Pi number is 3,1446(...) go and measure on terrain!!! practical !!! 

PI=4/radical(PHI, the golden ratio = 1.61803399(...)) = 3.14460550981492(...) !!! 
 The Golden Ratio!!! 

Facts:
According to the true pi number the diameter of the Large Hadron Collider is smaller with 8.13 meters!
According to the true pi number the GREAT PYRAMID IS P.E.R.F.E.C.T.!!!!!!!
According to the true pi number N.A.S.A. is using the true PI number. lol
According to the true pi number the humans will be able to build more perfect buildings (and durable ffs!!!)
ACCORDING TO THE TRUE PI NUMBER THE MARKO RODIN SINGLE TORUS COIL WILL BE UPGRADED AND MORE EFFICIENT!!! and a little bigger in diameter )

Originally Posted by maximumgravity1 

Hey fr0sty,

Regarding the Ark of the Covenant comments, there are many illogical explanations regarding the "sarcophagus" in the Kings Chamber, among other things. I have my own explanations, but will reserve them for now. I do find it interesting that the Ark would fit in there. It really makes perfect sense to me. I find one of the most amazing things about the Pyramids is until this last century, man could not fathom a building being that tall. There was no such way to build a building that big. Ironically, the tallest - the World Trade Center Towers, didn't even make it 100 years. I live in a house that is about 110 years old, and it is constantly in need of maintenance, and "major" structural repairs. Yet the pyramids have remained in perfect alignment and structural integrity for well over 4000 years. I think it really shows how insignificant our modern thought really is.

Interesting info regarding Pi. I had seen a documentary on TV about 15 years ago that discussed this in some detail regarding the Pyramid. The final conclusion pretty much supports your conclusions. They estimated that the same mathematics would be reached by taking a wheel, and walking the side of the pyramid, then basically, doubling that for the height. Apparently, the anomaly works itself into that equation, to make it differ from the mathematical ideal. 

For the rest of what you post - I really have no idea what you are trying to say. The only words I understood was North Star.

I have also read a few different books regarding "Pyramid Mathematics". It makes me believe that we are missing something with our conventional math. In reading your post, I am even more convinced of it. LOL 

I have also found that geometric structures do not translate in real life to what our mathematical models suggest. Your diamond structure is a prime example. I found this out building a pyramid out of smaller pyramids and tetrahedrons. I basically stumbled across Pascal's Pyramid (at least as representedby this page). The only difference, is the way it is drawn on that website is a bit confusing, is more of a cross-section of the octahedron, instead of a general octahedron shape that you would build. This looks like someone took a core sample. However, the important thing is it requires a combination of tetrahedron and pyramids to build, tetrahedrons alone are only an optical illusion when the pyramid is rotated. I discovered this with many shapes we represent geometrically. They are not true geometric shapes - just optical illusions of viewing from a rotated angle. I will build a model and post as an explanation if anyone is interested. I have one now, but all pyramids and tetrahedron are white, so it is difficult to understand visually where the tetrahedrons begin and end.