Home  |  Contact  

Email:

Password:

Sign Up Now!

Forgot your password?

Secreto Masonico
 
What’s New
  Join Now
  Message Board 
  Image Gallery 
 Files and Documents 
 Polls and Test 
  Member List
 EL SECRETO DE LA INICIACIÓN 
 Procesos Secretos del Alma 
 Estructura Secreta del Ritual Masónico 
 Los extraños Ritos de Sangre 
 Cámara de Reflexiones 
 
 
  Tools
 
General: The Keys of Atlantis-Vescica Piscis y el paralelo 30/Gran Piramide
Choose another message board
Previous subject  Next subject
Reply  Message 1 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999  (Original message) Sent: 05/02/2015 17:05

The Keys of Atlantis

A Study of Ancient Unified Numerical and Metrological Systems

by Peter Wakefield Sault

Copyright © Peter Wakefield Sault 1973-2012
All rights reserved worldwide

 


The Keys of Atlantis

 

Chapter 3.

Mountains of The Moon

The Stone-Cored Pyramids of Egypt


PROLEGOMENON

This little treatise is a mathematical, metrological, geographical and astronomical analysis of certain Egyptian pyramids. English translations of their ancient traditional names, less the names of the kings to whom rightly or wrongly a much later Egyptian priesthood attributed their building, are used here throughout except when quoting other authors. This is problematic since the original Great Pyramid is nowadays generally referred to as Khafre, Khephren or the Second Giza Pyramid. The original name of the pyramid now widely though erroneously known as the ‘Great Pyramid’ is Pyramid of The Horizon, or simply Horizon Pyramid. If, that is to say, ‘Horizon’ is the correct interpretation of the hieroglyph Akhet, about which some apparently justifiable doubt remains. In order to minimise the reader's possible confusion, the original and true Great Pyramid (i.e. ‘Khephren’) will here be referred to as the Grand Pyramid.

 

Sections

1.   The Giza Complex
2.   The Horizon Pyramid
3.   The Grand Pyramid
4.   The Divine Pyramid
5.   The Southern Shining Pyramid
6.   The Rising Sun Pyramid
7.   Theoretical Dimensions of The Stone-Cored Pyramids
8.   Earth And Moon
9.   The Western Cubit And Foot
10.   The Great Circle Way
11.   The Egyptological Fraud

Illustrations

1.   The Pyramids of Giza (1)
2.   Map of The Giza Pyramid Complex
3.   Theoretical Proportions of The Horizon Pyramid
4.   Stellated Pyramid
5.   Squaring The Circle ­­­­­­– Geometry of The Horizon Pyramid
6.   Theoretical Cross-Section of The Horizon Pyramid
7.   Theoretical Proportions of The Metrological Cavity of The Horizon Pyramid
8.   The Egyptian Stade
9.   Theoretical Cross-Section of The Grand Pyramid
10.   Theoretical Cross-Section of The Divine Pyramid
11.   Ratio between The Heights of Horizon and Divine Pyramids
12.   The Pyramids of Giza (2)
13.   The Southern Shining Pyramid
14.   Theoretical Slopes of The Southern Shining Pyramid
15.   Theoretical Slope of The Hidden Pyramid
16.   The Rising Sun Pyramid
17.   Theoretical Geometry of The Rising Sun Pyramid
18.   Volume Equivalent to The Rising Sun Pyramid
19.   Vesica Piscis And 30th Parallel
20.   Earth, Moon And Horizon Pyramid
21.   Earth, Moon And {3-4-5} Triangles
22.   Earth, Moon And Grand Pyramid
23.   The Seven Days of The World
24.   Abhisambodhi Vairocana Mandala
25.   The 30th Parallel
26.   The Dimensions of A Classical Guitar
27.   A 24-Inch Steel Rule
28.   Pyramids Road
29.   The Great Circle Way Discovered in Cairo
30.   The Great Circle Way from Atlantic to Pacific
31.   The Middle East in 1450 BC Traversed by The Great Circle Way

Animations

1.   Earth, Moon And Horizon Pyramid

Tables

1.   Theoretical Dimensions of The Metrological Cavity of the Horizon Pyramid
2.   Reported Measures of The Southern Shining Pyramid
3.   Reported Measures of The Rising Sun Pyramid
4.   Theoretical Volumes of The Stone-Cored Pyramids
5.   Identities of The 30th Parallel

References

 


 

3-1. The Giza Complex


Figure 3-1. The Pyramids of Giza (1)


Figure 3-2. Map of The Giza Pyramid Complex

 


 

3-2. The Horizon Pyramid

The Pyramid of The Horizon, known variously although erroneously as the Pyramid of Khufu, Pyramid of Kheops, Great Pyramid or First Giza Pyramid, stands on the Giza Plateau in Egypt at 29° 58' 45" N × 31° 08' 03" E. These and all other geographical coordinates given in this chapter have been obtained since 2006 with the aid of Google Earth and supercede all earlier figures from other sources.

Peter Tompkins summarizes the origin of the Horizon Pyramid thus[1]

“Though all agree that the Great [Horizon] Pyramid is at least four thousand years old, none can say for certain just when it was built, by whom, or why.”

The first thing to note about this observation is that Tompkins refrains from attempting to assign a maximum age to the Horizon Pyramid.

Tompkins' book ‘Secrets of The Great [Horizon] Pyramid’ (1971) is without doubt the most comprehensive compendium of myths, legends and knowledge about the Horizon Pyramid ever published and was, as noted on his website*, “not yet faulted in its original content”. Until now, that is to say, firstly in respect of his misapplication of the name ‘Great’ to the Horizon Pyramid and secondly in his treatment of Isaac Newton's fictive ‘Memphis Cubit’ as if it were a genuine unit of measure when it was never more than a figment of Newton's fevered imagination. These matters will be discussed in detail in the final section of this chapter, ‘The Egyptological Fraud’.

Tompkins goes on to say[2]

“It would be satisfactory to be able to describe the method by which the Great [Horizon] Pyramid was put together, by whom, and when.

“But the builders, whoever they may have been, left no description of their method. No one has even found a later Egyptian report of how the first pyramids were built.”

The earliest extant reference to the Horizon Pyramid comes from Herodotus, who says[7]

“To build the pyramid itself took twenty years; it is square at the base, its height (800 feet) equal to the length of each side; it is of polished stone blocks beautifully fitted, none of the blocks being less than thirty feet long.”

It would be another 2,000 years before the Horizon Pyramid was accurately surveyed and the relationship between its height and the length of each side thereby properly observed. With the missing part of the statement inserted:­­­­­­– The quadrant whose radius is the height is equal to the length of each side.


Figure 3-3. Theoretical Proportions of the Horizon Pyramid

Some of the earlier surveys contained errors and gave rise to some preposterous theories, none of which will be discussed here, about which Prof. W.M.F.Petrie says[8]

“It is useless to state the real truth of the matter, as it has no effect on those who are subject to this type of hallucination. They can but be left with the flat earth believers and other such people to whom a theory is dearer than a fact.”

 

 

http://www.odeion.org/atlantis/chapter-3.html

 


First  Previous  2 to 10 of 10  Next   Last  
Reply  Message 2 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 05/02/2015 17:08
 

The results of the two most reputable surveys of the Giza pyramids, those of W.M.F.Petrie (1881) and J.H.Cole (1925, Horizon Pyramid only), are shown in Appendix C. Since these surveys were conducted, certain peculiarities in the form of the Horizon Pyramid have come to light, not the least being a very slight indentation of the sides which results in the distance across the middle of the base (BC in Figure 3-3), between opposite apothems (AB and AC in Figure 3-3), being shorter than the lengths of the sides parallel to it, by about 1.2 metres. The indentations went unnoticed until discovered by aerial photography and are visible only when the Sun is shining across a face, throwing half of that face into shadow. Their presence testifies to the high degree of precision with which the Horizon Pyramid was built.


Figure 3-4. Stellated Pyramid

The first person to comment on the apparent p (pi) relationship between the height of the Pyramid and the perimeter of its base was John Taylor, working from measurements made by John Perring during Howard Vyse's expedition in the 1830s. Petrie later opined that it formed the basis of one of the best theories regarding the intended dimensions. Of the angle and elevation of the Horizon Pyramid, Petrie says[12]

“On the whole, we probably cannot do better than take 51° 52' ± 2' as the nearest approximation to the mean angle of the Pyramid, allowing some weight to the South side.
“The mean base being 9,068.8 ± 0.5 inches, this yields a height of 5,776.0 ± 7.0 inches.”

This gives a range of ratios of base-width to height, varying between (9068.8 - 0.5)/(5776.0 + 7.0) and (9068.8 + 0.5)/(5776.0 - 7.0), or 1.5681 and 1.5721, with a difference of 0.004, or roughly 0.25%. It can be seen that the values p/2 (~1.5708) and 11/7 (~1.5714) both fall within this range.

This means that, whatever the true or intended dimensions, the height is equal to the radius of a circle whose circumference very closely approximates the perimeter of the base.


Figure 3-5. Squaring The Circle ­­­­­– Geometry of The Horizon Pyramid

The attribution of the building of the Horizon Pyramid to Khufu was documented first by Herodotus, who took it as fact on the basis of assertions made by the priests of Sais.

The modern evidence is equally suspect; some red ochre paint daubed on a block of stone in one of the cavities above the metrological cavity, the so-called King's Chamber, allegedly showing the cartouche of Khufu. There were, however, rumours of paintbrushes and cans of red ochre paint, still used by Egyptian quarry workers nowadays to mark stones, being carried into the Horizon Pyramid during Howard Vyse's expedition coincident with Vyse's need to raise new funding. This he succeeded in doing following the announcement of his convenient ‘discovery’ that the Horizon Pyramid could indeed be attributed to Khufu and therefore confidently dated ­­­­­– happily for everyone ­­­­­– in accordance with both Egyptian kinglists and the Torah's dating of ‘Creation’.

Moreover, the ancient cemeteries and boat pits adjacent to the Horizon Pyramid seem unlikely to have belonged to the builders or original keepers of any part of the Giza complex since they encroach upon the Horizon Pyramid's precinct, as can be seen quite clearly in satellite images. Such travesties would simply never have been permitted by the builders since all they have ever done is to despoil and desecrate the complex, as can also be seen quite clearly in satellite images. The later pyramid cults to which the cemeteries bear witness appear to have had as much to do with the building of the Giza pyramids as latterday ersatz ‘druids’ have to do with that of Stonehenge. The remains of the precinct walls of the two other main Giza pyramids can also clearly be seen in satellite images.

* * *

The first person known to have looked for a linear modulus of the Horizon Pyramid in the dimensions of the metrological cavity was Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), working from measurements of it made separately by John Greaves (1638) and Tito Livio Burattini (1642). Through a particularly abstruse line of argument, Newton concluded that this modulus was equal to a tenth part of the width of the cavity. It was the dimensions of the Earth that Newton was looking for in order to confirm his theory of gravitation and he had acquired from an unknown source the belief that the builders had encoded these dimensions in those of the Horizon Pyramid. As Tompkins records[3]

“...it was from Greaves's data that Sir Isaac Newton deduced that the Great [Horizon] Pyramid had been built on the basis of two different cubits, one of which he called ‘profane’ and the other which called ‘sacred’. From Greaves's and Burattini's measurements of the King's Chamber, Newton computed that a cubit of 20.63 British inches produced a room with an even length of cubits: 20 x 10. This cubit Newton called the ‘profane’, or ‘Memphis’, cubit; whereas a longer, more arcane cubit appeared to measure about 25 British inches.

“This longer, or ‘sacred’, cubit Newton derived from the Jewish historian Josephus's description of the circumference of the pillars of the Temple at Jerusalem. Newton estimated this cubit to be between 24.80 and 25.02 English inches, but believed the figure could be refined through further measurements of the Great [Horizon] Pyramid and other ancient buildings.

“All of this Newton wrote up in a small and now hard-to-find paper called A Dissertation upon the Sacred Cubit of the Jews and the Cubits of several Nations; in which, as taken by Mr. John Greaves, the ancient Cubit of Memphis is determined.

“Newton's preoccupation with establishing the cubit of the ancient Egyptians was no idle curiosity, nor just a desire to find a universal standard of measure; his general theory of gravitation, which he had not yet announced, was dependent on an accurate knowledge of the circumference of the earth. All he had to go on were the old figures of Eratosthenes and his followers, and on their figures his theory did not work out accurately.

“By establishing the cubit of the ancient Egyptians, Newton hoped to find the exact length of their stadium, reputed by classical authors to bear a relation to a geographical degree, and this he believed to be somehow enshrined in the proportions of the Great [Horizon] Pyramid.”

Newton was working backwards from a purely hypothetical Israelite cubit allegedly described by a now largely discredited historian and of which no physical example existed, via the ratio 6:7 (that of a hypothetical ‘profane’, or ‘common’, cubit to a hypothetical ‘sacred’, or ‘royal’, cubit and a Diophantine approximation to √3:2, that being the exact ratio of the dimensions of 30th Parallel and Equator on a sphere), to a division by 10 of the width of the floor of the metrological cavity of the Horizon Pyramid thence to postulate a ‘Memphis’ cubit that had existed since the foundation of Egypt. Clearly this line of argument is far-fetched, to say the very least. Nonetheless, subsequent authorities bowed to that of Newton and, for example, Dr. Charles Piazzi Smyth lauded Newton thus:[4]

“How thankful should we be that it pleased God to raise up the spirit of Newton amongst us; and enable him to make one of the most important discoveries of his riper years ­­­­­– though the opposition of the Church of England has caused it to remain unread almost to the present day ­­­­­– that while there undoubtedly was in ancient times a cubit of 20.7 inches nearly... ...and which Newton calls ‘the profane cubit’ there was another which he equally unhesitatingly speaks of as the sacred cubit, decidedly longer.”

Petrie also accepted without question the use of Newton's Israelite cubit in the construction of the Horizon Pyramid [9]

“Thus the total length of the plug-blocks would be about 203 inches, or very probably 206 inches, or 10 [Newton's] cubits, like so many lengths marked out in that passage.”

And then Prof. Livio Stecchini adds his stamp of approval;[6]

“It was Newton who, on the basis of the survey conducted by Greaves, realized that the King's Chamber measures 10 by 20 [Newton's] cubits. Having established this fact,...”

Others, however, have noticed the insubstantial nature of Newton's cubit, Derek Gjertsen observing in respect of it that[14]

“As with many such works, both before and after, however tight the reasoning, the reliability of the conclusions will still depend upon the accuracy of the initial assumptions. As many of these were, in fact, no more than guesses, Newton's conclusions lose much of their initial plausibility.”

Despite its dubious pedigree many contemporary authors continue to treat Newton's cubit as if it was genuine.

The only clear facts are that the proportions of the floor of the metrological cavity are 1:2 and that the length is a whole-number division of both the width and the height of the pyramid, making these 22 and 14 cavity-lengths respectively. Hence, for the floor, the longest common linear extent is the width of the cavity, 206.3 ±0.2, English inches (5.24m). This is indeed close to Petrie's reported length of the plug-blocks, as noted above. The width of the cavity is to its height as 9:10 and taking this into account the longest common length that can be derived from all three of its dimensions is a unit equal to a tenth part of the height of the cavity, again unlike Newton's cubit, at ~22.9 English inches (~582mm). In terms of this linear modulus, or Horizon cubit, the width of the base and the height of the Horizon Pyramid come out at 396 and 252 respectively. The figure for the width of the base is remarkably close to that suggested by French scientist Edmé-François Jomard (1777-1862), 400 pyk belady, that being the number of cubits to a stade.[5]

“In vain Jomard argued that he had found an even more surprising coincidence in that the four-hundredth part of his base of the [Horizon] Pyramid gave a figure of .5773 meter, which was exactly the length of a longer modern Egyptian cubit called the pyk belady.”

Jomard's measure of the width of the base was, however, slightly excessive since 1/400th of the actual width is 0.5759 metre (22.67 inches), taking J.H.Cole's mean value of 230.364 metres, where 1/396th gives 0.5817 metre (22.9 inches). Moreover, the square stade is the area of the sacred precinct, not of the temple which stands within it. Hence the Horizon stade would be expected to exceed the width of the Horizon Pyramid. Four hundred Horizon cubits gives a stade of some 9,160 inches (232.66 metre). Curiously, 1/400th of Perring's erroneous figure for the width of the base, 764 English feet, is the pyk belady of 22.9 English inches.

Although the pyk belady was in use in Egypt in Jomard's time nothing is known of its origin and history therefore no firm conclusion can be reached about the age of the Horizon Pyramid from the fact that it is the modulus. All that can be said of the modulus is that it must of necessity predate any structure which incorporates it. The name ‘pyk belady’ combines the Egyptian word for a cubit, etymologically related to the Greek ΠΗΧΥΣ, pekhus and ΠΥΓΩΝ, pygon, both also meaning a cubit, with that for ‘our land’, as in the modern Egyptian national anthem ‘Belady, Belady, Belady’. Hence ‘pyk belady’ can be taken to mean ‘national cubit [of Egypt]’.



Figure 3-6. Theoretical Cross-Section of The Horizon Pyramid

It might be thought that metrological standards in ancient times followed the same principle as those of today and that, therefore, a given unit would have measured exactly the same absolute quantity no matter what the context. However, as was seen in the case of the Parthenon stade, the unit used for the temple, although approximating it, was not the same as that of the general tradesman. There seems to be no intentional conversion ratio between the two standards, which merely approximate one another, varying only by a few inches; varying nonetheless. It would appear that in the field of monumental architecture units were consistent only within the context of a particular undertaking and that an architectural guild was at liberty to contrive its own linear standards project by project within a fairly narrow range of lengths as long as they conformed to a uniform fixed system. The particular set of standards for each pyramid was created and ritually consecrated specifically for that pyramid then ritually desecrated and made useless once the building was complete. A remnant of this ritual destruction of the project standards can be seen in the modern ceremony of cutting the ribbon at the official opening of a new public building by some or other dignitary. The ribbon symbolises the primary standard, the stade rope, used in the construction.

The averaged, corrected measures of the metrological cavity are shown in Table 3-1. Petrie's words concerning the condition of the cavity as he found it must be borne in mind.[10]

“The King's Chamber was more completely measured than any other part of the Pyramid; the distances of the walls apart, their verticality in each corner, the course heights, and the levels, were completely observed. On every side the joints of the stones have separated, and the whole chamber is shaken larger. By examining the joints all round the 2nd course, the sum of the estimated openings is, 3 joints opened on N. side, total = .19 [English inches]; 1 joint on E. = .14; 5 joints on S. = .41; 2 joints on W. = .38. And these quantities must be deducted from the measures, in order to get the true original lengths of the chamber. I also observed, in measuring the top near the W., that the width from N. to S. is lengthened .3 by a crack at the S. side.

“These openings or cracks are but the milder signs of the great injury that that the whole chamber has sustained, probably by an earthquake, when every roof beam was broken across near the South side; and since which the whole of the granite ceiling (weighing some 400 tons), is upheld solely by sticking and thrusting. Not only has this wreck overtaken the chamber itself, but in every one of the spaces above it are the massive roof-beams either cracked or torn out of the wall, more or less, at the South side; and the great Eastern and Western walls of limestone, between, and independent of which, the whole of these construction chambers are built, have sunk bodily. All these motions are yet but small ­­­­­– only a matter of an inch or two ­­­­­– but enough to wreck the theoretical strength and stability of these chambers, and to make their downfall a mere question of time and earthquakes.”

 

 

“The floor of the chamber, as is well known, is quite disconnected from the walls, and stands somewhat above the base of the lowest course. It is very irregular in its level, not only absolutely, but even in relation to the courses; its depth below the first course joint varying 2.29 [English inches], from 42.94 to 40.65.”

This is an example of the marriage of certain irrational and mutually incommensurable numerical constants, such as π (pi) and 2 (square root of 2), using a system of whole numbers and their ratios. In order to do this, some rough-and-ready approximations must be incorporated. The primary approximation expressed by the gross form of the Horizon Pyramid is that of 6 2/7, or the perimeter of the base divided by the height, as a representation of the value 2π. Hence there can be no exact expression of any of the constants referenced in any of the physical approximations embodied in any of the structures. In fact, to find a single exact value anywhere would be to exclude all possibility of finding comparable references. The architect has created a compendium of equally variant Diophantine approximations.


Figure 3-7. Theoretical Proportions of The Metrological Cavity of The Horizon Pyramid

In terms of the proportion 9:10:18, employing the derived Horizon cubit of ~22.9 English inches:- The theoretical surface area of the metrological cavity is 864 square Horizon cubits. This is equal to the surface area of a cube of edge 12 Horizon cubits. The volumes of the cavity and its cube of equal surface area are in the ratio of a naturally tempered musical semitone, 15:16. This is also the ratio of both the widths of the bases (variance 0.34%) and the capacities of the coffers of the Grand and Horizon Pyramids. The sum of the lengths of all the edges of a 12-cubit cube is to that of the cavity as 36:37. The theoretical volume of the Horizon Pyramid is 13,172,544 cubic Horizon cubits.

13,172,544 = 26 × 35 × 71 × 112 = 7 × 332 × 123

 

 


Reply  Message 3 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 05/02/2015 17:09
 

That is exactly equal to 7,623 12-cubit cubes; cubes, that is, of surface area equal to that of the theoretical metrological cavity. Now, these 7,623 cubes can be arranged as a stack of 7 equal square tiers of width 33. With the width of the tiers equal to the width of the base of the pyramid, the height of the resulting rectangular block is exactly 1/3rd of the height of the pyramid. Altogether, the figure clearly embodies in whole numbers the arithmetical method for calculating the volume of any pyramid; one third of the height times the area of the base.

Hence it may be concluded that the Horizon Pyramid was laid out and constructed using the pyk belady as its modulus. However, because nothing is known about the history of this unit of measure beyond its use in the construction of the Horizon Pyramid and its general use in Egypt at the time of Jomard's visit, its age and origin cannot be established and, therefore, no firm conclusion can be drawn about the age of the Horizon Pyramid from its use. Jomard's observation is seemingly the only connection to any memory of its existence, since all other mentions of this unit themselves refer back to him as their source. Nonetheless it is clear that the linear modulus of the Horizon Pyramid possesses a unique name and is no mere hypothesis. Not only that but the Horizon Pyramid linear modulus can confidently be labelled the Egyptian cubit, for that indeed is what it is.


Figure 3-8. The Egyptian Stade

Taking the disk of the Earth as a circle and the value of pi as 22/7, in Egyptian stades of 400 cubits the circumference so obtained is exactly 171,072 Egyptian stades and the radius 27,216. A Greek stade on the same circle would be exactly equal to 99/125 Egyptian stade (terrestrial circumference = 216,000 Greek stades).

The Horizon Pyramid width, at 99/100 Egyptian stades, is equally interesting since the terrestrial circumference comes out at 172,800 or 100 times the cube of 12. Moreover, again on the same circle, it is exactly equal to 1¼ Greek stades, the Greek metric standards having been supplied to Solon by the Temple of Neith at Sais around 600 BC, suggesting an unbroken tradition stretching from the building of the Giza complex to that of the Parthenon of Athens. The Greek system of linear measures was derived from the Egyptian and both include a digit (finger) as the smallest unit, a foot of 16 digits, a cubit of 24 digits and a stade of 600 feet.

* Peter Tompkins' website was removed from the World-Wide Web in February 2008, a year after his death in January 2007. This author has a copy saved in his archives.

 


 

3-3. The Grand Pyramid

The mean width of the base of the Grand Pyramid is almost exactly 370 Horizon cubits (pyk belady), the variance being roughly 1 part in 6,000 or 0.016%, and here the rounded figure will be assumed to be the intended width. This pyramid was apparently intended to conform to the proportions of a Pythagorean {3-4-5} triangle, giving a theoretical height of 246⅔ cubits or 370 feet.


Figure 3-9. Theoretical Cross-Section of The Grand Pyramid


The theoretical volume of the Grand Pyramid is exactly 37,989,750 cubic Horizon feet.

37,989,750 = 2 × 3 × 53 × 373 = 6 × 1853

The length of each edge of the 6 cubes so defined is equal to half the height of, and to one third the width of, the pyramid.

 


 

3-4. The Divine Pyramid

Petrie's mean for the width of the Divine Pyramid is 4,153.6 English inches, or roughly 181.34 Horizon cubits with a probable intended figure of 181⅓ cubits, or 272 Horizon feet exactly, differing from the mean by ­­­­­–0.004%. For the angle of the apothem Petrie's “best conclusion” is 51°0' ± 10'. This results in a height somewhere between 2549 and 2580 English inches, or roughly 167 and 169 Horizon feet. Taking the mean gives a height of 168 feet and this will be found to share a common factor of 8 with the theoretical width. Hence the proportions are 21 rise on 17 base, revealing a clearly intended allusion in the division of the width by the height to Φ (Phi), the Golden Mean or Divine Proportion, differing from it by a mere +0.06%. In fact the ratio of height into width, 21:34, displayed by the Divine Pyramid is the 8th term of the Fibonacci Sequence, which converges to Phi.[18]



Figure 3-10. Theoretical Cross-Section of The Divine Pyramid


The theoretical volume of the Divine Pyramid is exactly 4,143,104 cubic Horizon feet.

4,143,104 = 7 × 342 × 83

* * *


Figure 3-11. The Ratio between The Heights of Horizon And Divine Pyramids

The ratio between the heights of Horizon and Divine pyramids is the same as that between the length and breadth respectively of the platform of the Parthenon of Athens - 4:9. This ratio belongs to the Lambda, itself the root and source of the dodekaphonic musical scale, as described in Chapter 1, suggesting that the Giza complex comprises an integrated design and that its overall planning was completed before a single stone was quarried for a single pyramid.


Figure 3-12. The Pyramids of Giza (2)

 


 

3-5. The Southern Shining Pyramid


Figure 3-13. The Southern Shining Pyramid

The reader can forget the Egyptological dogma that seeks to explain the compound slope of the Southern Shining Pyramid as a decision by the builders to switch slopes in mid-project, the rationalization of this usually being that they discovered that the internal stresses of the structure prevented completion of a pyramid with the continued slope of the lower section. How exactly they discovered this is never made clear and no evidence supporting the stress-factor hypothesis is ever presented. It is of course a flight of fancy, for from the outset the Southern Shining Pyramid was designed to be a flattened obelisk, as the following analysis of its geometry will make very clear.

 

 


Reply  Message 4 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 05/02/2015 17:11
 
The theoretical volume of the Southern Shining Pyramid is exactly 7,286,976 cubic Southern Shining cubits.

7,286,976 = 123 × 4217

The outer form contains an implied inner, or hidden, pyramid.


Figure 3-15. Theoretical Slope of The Hidden Pyramid


The theoretical volume of the Hidden Pyramid is exactly 6,298,560 cubic Southern Shining cubits.

6,298,560 = 123 × 93 × 5 = 5 × 1083

The length of each edge of the 5 cubes so defined is equal to three fifths (0.6) the height of, and to one third the width of, the Hidden Pyramid.

 


 

3-6. The Rising Sun Pyramid


Figure 3-16. The Rising Sun Pyramid

The Rising Sun Pyramid, also known as the Red Pyramid because of the colour of its exposed rocky core, is located in the Dahshur pyramid field at 29° 48' 30.9" N × 31° 12' 22" E. This is a large pyramid with a rock core and, like every pyramid and mastaba, has been stripped of its limestone casing by stone robbers, leading directly to the complete and utter collapses of those many pyramids which had been built with mud brick cores. However, with the cores exposed aerial photography and now satellite imaging reveal that those of both the Horizon Pyramid and the Rising Sun Pyramid are stellated, something that would have remained undetectable and completely unknown had they retained their unstellated casings. This means only that both pyramids are unquestionably products of the same guild of architects, assuming that no single architect working in isolation could have raised all the stone-cored pyramids given both the magnitude of each project individually and the number of other pyramids with similarly stellated stone cores.

 

 


Reply  Message 5 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 05/02/2015 17:12

It should be noted that the recovery here of the ancient Egyptian stade has been made possible only very recently by the emergences of the Global Positioning System and Google Earth (see Appendix C). In other words, with data from artificial satellites and radio telemetry. The question of how the builders could position the Horizon Pyramid so very precisely without such aids belongs with that other great mystery ­­­­­– how the Horizon Pyramid was built.

The significance of the 30th Parallel in the scheme of things is that it can be geometrically constructed in cross-section, with compasses and straightedge, via a vesica piscis. The three-dimensional analog of the vesica is formed by the overlapping of two equal spheres such that the centre of one lies on the surface of the other, with the 30th Parallel occurring along the intersection of the surfaces.


Figure 3-19. Vesica Piscis And 30th Parallel

From here on the latitudes of the apex of the Horizon Pyramid, of the radius of exactly 3⅔ Lunar radii and of the most northerly overhead Moon will be treated as identities of the 30th Parallel. Furthermore, Moon and Earth will be treated as reference spheres whose radii are in the ratio 3:11. And π will be evaluated at 22/7, for by doing all of these things a series of remarkable coincidences will be encountered.


Figure 3-20. Earth, Moon And Horizon Pyramid

 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 6 of 54 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 11:36

When the disk of the Moon is also enclosed in a square, the first such coincidence is the appearance of Pythagorean {3-4-5} triangles in the geometrical construction resulting from its juxtaposition with the disk of the Earth.


Figure 3-21. Earth, Moon And {3-4-5} Triangles

Extending the construction to form a cross-section of the Grand Pyramid, the lengths of the component lines must be multiplied up, in this case by 12 (the sum of 3, 4 and 5), in order to continue expressing them all as whole numbers. This gives a unit exactly equal to 60 English miles, 60 being the product of 3, 4 and 5. Put another way, if the modulus of the diagram shown in Figure 3-22, equal to 1/132nd of the diameter of the Terrestrial reference sphere, the Grand span, is subdivided by the product of 3, 4 and 5 then the result is a unit of length which is exactly equal to a modern English or U.S. mile.


Figure 3-22. Earth, Moon And Grand Pyramid

In terms of the Grand span derived in Figure 3-22, the combined diameters of the Terrestrial and Lunar reference spheres is 168. That is also the number of hours in each and every week. Just as the Grand span is exactly divisible into 60 English miles, so the hour is divided into 60 minutes and the number of minutes in every seven-day period is exactly 10,080. Seven days is very roughly the period of a single Lunar quarter.


Figure 3-23. The Seven Days of The World

The radius of the large circle whose circumference is equal to the perimeter of the square around the Earth, taking π (pi) to be 22/7, is 5,040 miles. 5,040 is the product of all the numbers from 1 to 7, written 7! and is known as the factorial of seven.

5,040 = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 × 7 = 7!

The modulus of the diagram shown in Figure 3-21 is 720 miles. 720 is the factorial of six.

720 = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 = 6!

The circumference of the large circle, again taking π = 22/7, is exactly 528 Grand spans, or 31,680 miles, and this is of course equal in length to the perimeter of the square around the Earth, the base of the virtual cosmic Horizon Pyramid whose height is equal to the combined radii of Earth and Moon, or 5,040 miles.


Figure 3-24. Abhisambodhi Vairocana Mandala (Tibet, 14th Century)

 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 7 of 54 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 11:37

The story of the Grand span does not end there but provides yet another identity of the 30th Parallel. At latitude 29°45'30" N, some 16½ miles south of the Horizon Pyramid, the circumference of the parallel is exactly 360 Grand spans. This means that the Grand span is the length of a degree and the mile the length of a minute of arc along that parallel.


Figure 3-25. The 30th Parallel

 


 

3-9. The Western Cubit And Foot

Before the introduction of the Napoleonic system, in one form or another Long Measure was in widespread use throughout Western Europe . Evidence for this lies in the Spanish, or classical, guitar which will be found always to have a 24-inch action, as shown in Figure 3-26.


Figure 3-26. The Dimensions of A Classical Guitar

Twenty four inches or digits comprise a common cubit, the particular length here (609.6mm) being the Western European standard, as distinct from Greek, Egyptian or other standardized cubits. The English system includes a great cubit, the yard, equal to 1½ common cubits, from which the inch is derived*. The English statutory foot, however, appears to be defective or aberrant since it breaks the general rule that makes the common cubit the harmonic mean of it (the foot) and the great cubit. The foot is that unit in the cubit sequence which cannot be divided in three equal parts each a whole number of digits and which thereby naturally terminates the sequence. Hence a proper Western foot would have to be 16 inches (406.4mm) long, just as Greek and Egyptian feet each comprise sixteen of their respective digits.

There are exactly 3,960 such Western feet in a mile, thus the Western foot divides the mile in exactly the same number as the mile divides that radius of the Earth, at 29°26'45" N, which is in an exact ratio of 11:3 with the radius of the Moon.


Figure 3-27. A 24-Inch Steel Rule (Rabone Chesterman, England, 1970)

* The Statutum de Admensuratione Terrae (1305) states [13]:-

 

 


 

3-10. The Great Circle Way


Figure 3-28. Pyramids Road (Map: Google)

Al-Ahram, Pyramids Road, is a broad thoroughfare that runs in a straight line WSW from the Nile, terminating in the desert about five hundred yards north of the Horizon Pyramid. It is very ancient, possibly even more so than the pyramids themselves. It seems as if the city of Cairo itself has sprung up around this very road.


Figure 3-29. The Great Circle Way Discovered in Cairo (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)

The azimuth of Pyramids Road at Cairo is 66.666°, making it a segment of a great circle whose northern vertex lies on the High Pass through the Himalayas in the vicinity of Kashmir at coordinates 37° 18' N × 71° 54' E. This same great circle is the shortest uninterrupted land route from the Atlantic coast of Africa, Liberia to be precise, to the Pacific coast of China. Curiously, the point at which it meets the Atlantic is also the eastern end of the shortest route across the Atlantic.


Figure 3-30. The Great Circle Way from Atlantic to Pacific (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)

 


Figure 3-31. The Middle East in 1450 BC Traversed by The Great Circle Way

 


 

3-11. The Egyptological Fraud

In 1654 James Usher, Archbishop of Armagh, announced that the Earth was ‘created’ in 4004 BC. This he did ­­­­­– without a trace of irony ­­­­­– on the basis of a patently absurd Judaic myth. A contemporary of Isaac Newton, John Lightfoot, Vice-chancellor of the University of Cambridge went so far as to narrow it down to 9 o'clock a.m. on the 23rd October of the same year[15]. Moreover, even this year, which must have seemed almost unimaginably ancient to Usher and Lightfoot, was obtained by downright fraud ­­­­­– the presentation of ages measured in months as if they were in solar years. The fraud was neither's but was instead that of the authors of the Judaic mythology, which may not even be a genuine mythology at all but one concocted for political purposes. For example, the age to which Noah is alleged to have lived was 950 solar years and these years are factored into the date of ‘Creation’ given above. It is quite obvious that the lifespan of Noah was not 950 solar years but the same number of months and using a nominal conversion rate of 13 months per solar year this translates to 73 solar years. Clearly Noah was an ordinary man, alleged extraordinary feats notwithstanding. In correcting this lifespan alone, the date of ‘Creation’ is brought forward by 877 years. However, Noah was not the only ancient Hebrew credited with an over-extended lifespan. If the age of Adam (930 months = 71½ years) and the period from Adam's death to the birth of Noah (216 months = 16½ years) are similarly corrected, then the date of ‘Creation’ must be brought forward by 1,935 years. Applying similar corrections to all the “generations of Adam”, the year of ‘Creation’ turns out to have been around 2000 BC at the earliest. If the dubious attribution of the Horizon Pyramid to King Khufu and the even more dubious dating of his reign to around 2600 BC are accepted then the pyramid must have been completed some six hundred years before ‘Creation’.

Nonetheless, despite the utter improbability of its claims and the complete lack of any supporting or corroborating evidence of a Hebrew or ‘Israelite’ presence there, Jean-François Champollion, the so-called ‘Father of Egyptology’, based his kinglist of Ancient Egypt upon the books of the Torah. As Peter Tompkins puts it:[19]

“By the time he was seventeen, Champollion had made his first table of the succession of Egyptian pharaohs, based on data culled from the Old Testament.”

Tompkins displays an interesting turn of phrase. When he states that Champollion “based” his kinglist on the so-called “Old Testament”, what he is actually saying (whether he knew it or not) is that Champollion fabricated a kinglist to conform to the Torah. This means that the entire history of the peoples of the Nile Valley as presented to the world by ‘Egyptologists’ cannot be trusted and is, therefore, worthless. Moreover it means that even if a King Khufu was indeed the commissioner of the Horizon Pyramid, as asserted to Herodotus by the Saite priesthood around 440 BC, the dating of his reign is based upon false evidence. All of the evidence that might have revealed some of the true history has been subject to systematic removal or destruction by subsequent generations of ‘Egyptologists’ with the singular purpose of continued funding from those with a vested interest in the perpetuation of fabricated histories, in particular that of the Torah. Academia is being selective when it chooses to believe what a priesthood had to say to Herodotus about the commissioner of the Horizon Pyramid and yet to disbelieve that same priesthood when, in around 600 BC, it informed Solon that an entire civilization had disappeared from the face of the Earth some 9,000 years before their time.

Champollion, like Newton before him, was a Freemason and likewise immersed in the masonic machinations of his time.

To be continued

 


Mountains of The Moon

 

References
1.   Peter Tompkins, Secrets of The Great [Horizon] Pyramid, 1971, p.xiii
2.   ibid. p.217
3.   ibid. pp.30-31
4.   ibid. p.77 (footnote)
5.   ibid. p.47
6.   Livio Catullo Stecchini, Notes On The Relation Of Ancient Measures To The Great [Horizon] Pyramid, included as an appendix to Secrets of The Great [Horizon] Pyramid, 1971, p.323
7.   Herodotus, The Histories, circa 440 B.C.
8.   W.M.F.Petrie, Seventy Years in Archaeology
9.   W.M.F.Petrie, The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh, 1883, p.88
10.   ibid. p.27
11.   ibid. p.28
12.   ibid. p.13
13.   A.E.Berriman, Historical Metrology, 1953, p.170
14.   Derek Gjertsen, The Newton Handbook, 1986, p.6
15.   ibid. p.7
16.   Mark Lehner, The Complete Pyramids, 1997, p.102
17.   ibid. p.104
18.   H.E.Huntley, The Divine Proportion, 1970, p.47
19.   Peter Tompkins, The Magic of Obelisks, 1981, p.160

 

 


The Keys of Atlantis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.odeion.org/atlantis/chapter-3.html

 

“And be it remembered that the Iron Yard of our Lord the King containeth three feet and no more. And a foot ought to contain 12 inches, by the right measure of this yard measured; to wit the thirty-sixth part of this yard rightly measured maketh an inch neither more nor less.”
 

Reply  Message 6 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 09/01/2016 22:28
Related to Mykah's post, focusing on the pyramid symbology and the two faces.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showp...&postcount=166








I began to think of the celtic notions of above and below.

Think of a large tree, we only see half of the tree. We look in amazement and wonderment at the life that is harboured in its branches and the incredible atmospheric processing factory the tree is. We forget that below us is the other half of the tree, its roots providing a harbour for an entire ecosystem, and the roots are an enormous chemical processing plant.




Duir - Double-ended oak treeThis picture comes from an ancient druid grove in Derby and shows an oak tree (Duir) with its branches and roots entwined to make the circle of life. In the 90s an ancient oak tree was uncovered as the sea went very far out on the Norfolk coast. It had been buried upside-down within a circle of posts, a woodhenge. Time Team built a replica of it that was most impressive and gave you a strong sense of what the place must have been about.

The concept of burying the tree upside-down, so its branches were in the earth and its roots in the heavens has lots of esoteric symbolism.
http://elensentier.wordpress.com/201...gham-duir-oak/

Two faces of the same coin.

I think of the pyramids coming in pairs. The depiction of the Star of David on the Israeli national flag is for me an indication of a double pyramid, one facing up, the other, subterranean facing down,




The pyramids true power was not just the enormous energies it sends up into the atmosphere, image those same huge energies also being transmitted downwards, or perhaps the underside pyramid focuses the subterranean energies into the above ground pyramid?

I have often wondered what is beneath Silbury Hill, not just what is in it.

The Nile as Tree of Life:

but which is the root and which is the branch? What is up and what is down? For the Ancients, The Med was the bottom of Egypt, South was at the top. The Delta is the roots.



Black is white. Above is below. Top is down.

Last edited by white horse; 28-07-2013 at 07:54 AM.

Reply  Message 7 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 09/03/2016 22:33
22
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:28
8
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:27
24
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:27
40
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:26
194
Alcoseri 09/03/2016 19:25
60
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:24
18
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:23
87
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:22
5
Alcoseri 09/03/2016 19:22
13
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:21
12
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:19
2
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:18
24
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:17
62
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:14
31
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:13
9
Alcoseri 09/03/2016 19:12
16
Alcoseri 09/03/2016 19:12
87
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:11
75
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:10
18
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:09
86
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:08
53
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:07
65
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:07
15
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:06
15
Alcoseri 09/03/2016 19:06
46
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:05
23
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:04
142
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:03
97
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:02
23
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:01
35
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:00
22
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 19:00
10
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 18:59
24
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 18:59
10
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 18:54
18
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 18:53
104
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 18:50
16
BARILOCHENSE6999 09/03/2016 18:47

Reply  Message 8 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 12/12/2016 17:24
Resultado de imagen de CIRCUNFERENCIA SOBRE DIAMETRO PI
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 58 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/11/2016 23:03
Resultado de imagen de CIRCUNFERENCIA SOBRE DIAMETRO PI
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 59 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 19/11/2016 23:13
Resultado de imagen de RAZON CIRCUNFERENCIA DIAMETRO PI
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 60 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 20/11/2016 21:48
Resultado de imagen para diameter pi 3.14
 
La razon de la circunferencia y el diametro es obvio que es el numero PI.
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 61 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 20/11/2016 21:50
Resultado de imagen para diameter pi 3.14
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 62 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 20/11/2016 22:00
Resultado de imagen para diameter pi 3.14
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 63 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 20/11/2016 22:02
Resultado de imagen para diameter pi 3.14
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 64 of 64 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 20/11/2016 22:19
Resultado de imagen para diameter pi 3.14
 
22/7=DIA DE MARIA LA MAGDALENA=3.14 =PI
 
 
Reply  Message 61 of 63 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 27/11/2016 00:00
Resultado de imagen para LEVITICO 23:36
 
 
Reply  Message 62 of 63 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 29/11/2016 00:37
Resultado de imagen para MARY MAGDALENE PI
 
 
Reply  Message 63 of 63 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2016 20:52
Resultado de imagen para pyramid antarctica
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 178 of 182 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 23/11/2016 21:49

Resultado de imagen para talamo tercer ojo

 
 
 
SABIDURIA=SABADO=LETRA S=$
 
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 179 of 182 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 27/11/2016 00:02
Resultado de imagen para LEVITICO 23:36
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 180 of 182 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 29/11/2016 00:00
Resultado de imagen para apple 666 venus
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 181 of 182 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 29/11/2016 01:04
Resultado de imagen para PRINCIPIO FIN CIRCULO
 
 
Reply Hide message Delete message  Message 182 of 182 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 29/11/2016 20:38
15. Apocalipsis 1:8 Yo soy el ALFA
 
 y la Omega, principio y fin, dice el Señor, el que es y que era y que ha de venir, el Todopoderoso. 

16. Apocalipsis 1:11 que decía: Yo soy el ALFA y la Omega, el primero y el último. Escribe en un libro lo que ves, y envíalo a las siete iglesias que están en Asia: a Efeso, Esmirna, Pérgamo, Tiatira, Sardis, Filadelfia y Laodicea.
 
17. Apocalipsis 2:27 y las regirá con vara de hierro, y serán quebradas como vaso de ALFArero; como yo también la he recibido de mi Padre;
 
18. Apocalipsis 21:6 Y me dijo: Hecho está. Yo soy el ALFA y la Omega, el principio y el fin. Al que tuviere sed, yo le daré gratuitamente de la fuente del agua de la vida.
 
19. Apocalipsis 22:13 Yo soy el ALFA y la Omega, el principio y el fin, el primero y el último.

Reply  Message 9 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 10/09/2017 00:45
rom: Cajeli  (Original message) Sent: 03/09/2017 20:30
 
 

LA TORRE DE MAGDALA

De María Magdalena se cree que su nombre indica que ella pertenecía a la ciudad de Magdala, del hebreo migdál que significa “ciudad de las torres”, la cual ha querido ser asociada con un puerto pesquero, aledaño a una región donde proliferaban los burdeles.

 

Imagen relacionada
 

Su fama de prostituta se origina cuando la iglesia católica la quiso identificar con la mujer pecadora que ungió con perfumes a Jesús, en la casa de Simón el fariseo; sin embargo el pasaje de Lucas 7.36-50 donde se registra este hecho, no da el nombre de la mujer a quien Jesús le perdona sus pecados, ni mencionan los 7 demonios de los que Jesús libró a la Magdalena.

Aunque en el Evangelio no se dice que ella fuera viuda o casada, tampoco se dice que fuera soltera, o una prostituta. Estuvo relacionada con mujeres importantes como la esposa del intendente de Herodes, y ayudó a financiar con sus bienes el ministerio de Jesús. Teniendo en cuenta que migdal significa torre, el nombre de María Magdalena la muestra como mujer vigilante, como una atalaya.

Precisamente esta mujer permaneció atenta a todos los acontecimientos durante el ministerio de Jesús; estuvo presente “mirando de lejos” la crucifixión del Señor, junto con el grupo de mujeres que lideraba; fue ella quien vio el lugar donde Jesús era puesto luego de morir. También fue quien vio quitada la piedra del sepulcro el primer día de la semana; y fue quien primero vio a Jesús resucitado, y salió apresurada para anunciar las Buenas Nuevas.

Con su don especial de permanecer atenta, se asemeja a las cinco vírgenes sensatas que manutuvieron aprovisionadas sus lámparas hasta la llegada del Novio. La bendigo, y reconozco que la iglesia de Jesucristo necesita Atalayas como esta mujer, la cual representa a la iglesia fiel y vigilante que será la esposa del Cordero


 

 

Anuncios:


 First   Previous  2 to 12 of 12  Next    Last  
Reply  Message 2 of 12 on the subject 
From: Rolmen Sent: 03/09/2017 22:32
Muy bonito cuento, ¿Quién es el autor? Quizá Wilde, o tal vez Andersen, o Dumas? O sería el judío Raigorodsky? Qué sé yo, pero el cuento es fascinante, sobretodo, en la parte narrativa en la cual especifica que estuvo, María Magdalena, presente en muchos acontecimientos y me pregunto, de que viviría esa mujer que tenía espacio de tiempo para estar de fisgona, de verdad que se las inventan para tener entretenidos a los lectores creyentes de fábulas y la iglesia católica no pierde tiempo, la declara santa para seguir agregando adeptos y claro, digo esto esperando no ofender a nadie.  
Resultado de imagen para TOWER BACK TO THE FUTURE

Reply  Message 3 of 12 on the subject 
From: Cajeli Sent: 03/09/2017 22:43
 
La historia en realidad es algo más profunda.
 
María Magdalena era una mujer muy joven que cuidaban sus padres sabiendo que estaba endemoniada.
 
Sufría de neurosis y epilepsia, de esa manera se reflejaba su enfermedad espiritual, y por esto fue sanada por Jesús. No hay bases para afirmar que era prostituta, eso fue una enseñanza falsa, o mal entendido desde que en un sermón al Papa Gregorio I se le ocurrió decir que fue la mujer pecadora que ungió a Jesús con perfumes


Reply  Message 4 of 12 on the subject 
From: Rolmen Sent: 04/09/2017 00:26
Bueno Cajeli, real o no, es irrelevante, pero si, creo es una fantasía, es como tú mismo afirmas que el tal Gregorio I se le ocurrió que dicho personaje era una trabajadora sexual, bien pudo este sujeto u otro crear o tergiversar historias que luego, repetidas una y mil veces, con el tiempo se dan como verídicas, hay quienes afirman que esta mujer fue amante de Jesús Cristo e incluso tuvo vástagos de esa relación y no lo afirmo yo, sino está en boca de mucha gente y por ello te digo que las historias están trabucadas.  

Esta es otra región de Marte, Cydonia Mensae a 33ºN y 13ºW

 

 

 

sidon esta en el paralelo 33

CYDONIA EN MARTE Y EL 33

 

Resultado de imagen para APPLE OVNI

Reply  Message 5 of 12 on the subject 
From: Cajeli Sent: 04/09/2017 00:32
 
 
Este pasaje puede relacionarse con María Magdalena...
 
MATEO
15:21 Saliendo Jesús de allí, se FUE A LA REGIÓN DE TIRO Y SIDÓN. 

15:22 Y he aquí una mujer cananea que había salido de aquella región clamaba, diciéndole: ¡Señor, Hijo de David, ten misericordia de mí! Mi hija es gravemente atormentada por un demonio. 
 
15:23 Pero Jesús no le respondió palabra. Entonces acercándose sus discípulos, le rogaron, diciendo: Despídela, pues da voces tras nosotros. 
15:24 El respondiendo, dijo: No soy enviado sino a las ovejas perdidas de la casa de Israel.
15:25 Entonces ella vino y se postró ante él, diciendo: ¡Señor, socórreme! 
15:26 Respondiendo él, dijo: No está bien tomar el pan de los hijos, y echarlo a los perrillos.
15:27 Y ella dijo: Sí, Señor; pero aun los perrillos comen de las migajas que caen de la mesa de sus amos. 
15:28 Entonces respondiendo Jesús, dijo: Oh mujer, grande es tu fe; hágase contigo como quieres. Y su hija fue sanada desde aquella hora. 
15:29 Pasó Jesús de allí y vino junto al mar de Galilea; y subiendo al monte, se sentó allí. 
15:30 Y se le acercó mucha gente que traía consigo a cojos, ciegos, mudos, mancos, y otros muchos enfermos; y los pusieron a los pies de Jesús, y los sanó; 
15:31 de manera que la multitud se maravillaba, viendo a los mudos hablar, a los mancos sanados, a los cojos andar, y a los ciegos ver; y glorificaban al Dios de Israel.
15:32 Y Jesús, llamando a sus discípulos, dijo: Tengo compasión de la gente, porque ya hace tres días que están conmigo, y no tienen qué comer; y enviarlos en ayunas no quiero, no sea que desmayen en el camino. 
15:33 Entonces sus discípulos le dijeron: ¿De dónde tenemos nosotros tantos panes en el desierto, para saciar a una multitud tan grande? 
15:34 Jesús les dijo: ¿Cuántos panes tenéis? Y ellos dijeron: Siete, y unos pocos pececillos. 
15:35 Y mandó a la multitud que se recostase en tierra. 
15:36 Y tomando los siete panes y los peces, dio gracias, los partió y dio a sus discípulos, y los discípulos a la multitud. 
15:37 Y comieron todos, y se saciaron; y recogieron lo que sobró de los pedazos, siete canastas llenas.
15:38 Y eran los que habían comido, cuatro mil hombres, sin contar las mujeres y los niños. 
15:39 Entonces, despedida la gente, entró en la barca, y vino a la región de Magdala.
 
 
 
SIRIO ES LA CONSTELACION DEL PERRO/ CAN MAYOR
 
 
 
NOTEN EL NEXO DE DAN, CON LA SERPIENTE (VENECIA) Y EL CABALLO (PLAZA SAN MARCOS)
 
7. Génesis 49:17 Será Dan SERPIENTE junto al camino, Víbora junto a la senda, Que muerde los talones del caballo, Y hace caer hacia atrás al jinete.
Resultado de imagen para inferno venice
VENECIA=PLAZA SAN MARCOS
11. Proverbios 25:11 MANZANA de oro con figuras de plata
Es la palabra dicha como conviene.
 
12. Cantares 2:5 Sustentadme con pasas, confortadme con MANZANAs;
Porque estoy enferma de amor.
 
13. Cantares 7:8 Yo dije: Subiré a la palmera,
Asiré sus ramas.
Deja que tus pechos sean como racimos de vid,
Y el olor de tu boca como de MANZANAs,
Resultado de imagen para PHI 666
 
ALLI ESTA LA CONEXION VENUS / VENECIA CON EL 666
 
VENUS= PENTAGONO= VENECIA= NUMERO DE ORO= 1.618033
 
 
LAS MATEMATICAS SON EXACTAS.
GLORIA A DIOS TODOPODEROSO. QUE BELLAS SON LAS MATEMATICAS
Resultado de imagen para PENTAGONO PHI
Resultado de imagen para PENTAGONO PHI
Resultado de imagen para PENTAGONO PHI
Resultado de imagen para PENTAGONO PHI
Resultado de imagen para PYRAMID PHI
Resultado de imagen para BELLAS QUE SON LAS MATEMATICAS

Reply  Message 10 of 10 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 16/01/2019 18:32
Resultado de imagen para ISLAND GIORGIO VENICE
Resultado de imagen para MAQUINA DEL TIEMPO DE VENECIA
 
ISLA SAN GIORGIO (VENECIA)=GEORGE LEMAITRE
 
Resultado de imagen para VENICE SNAKE
 
Resultado de imagen para genesis 22:15,18
 
GEMATRIA EN INGLES DE SEED=33
GEMATRIA EN INGLES DE GATE=33
SARA (CE-SAREA DE FILIPO)=PARALELO 33
Resultado de imagen para MAGDALENE NEW MEXICO
Resultado de imagen para GALAXY PHI
Resultado de imagen para LEONARDO DA VINCI VENECIA
 
Resultado de imagen para BELLAS QUE SON LAS MATEMATICAS
Resultado de imagen para einstein estupidez infinita
Resultado de imagen para la mujer es machista
 
Resultado de imagen para travel through time
Resultado de imagen para MEXICO PHI NUMBER GOLDEN NUMBER
Image
Image
the Apple
Resultado de imagen para HAWKING CYGNUS
Resultado de imagen para MAGDALENE NEW MEXICO
Resultado de imagen para cristo no es dios
Resultado de imagen para MAGDALENE NEW MEXICO
Resultado de imagen para MAGDALENE NEW MEXICO
 
milky way in Simple Gematria Equals: 119 ( m 13 i9 l 12 k 11 y 25 0 w 23 a1 y 25 )
queen mary in Simple Gematria Equals: 119 ( q 17 u 21 e5 e5 n 14 0 m 13 a1 r 18 y 25  
hebrew calendar in Simple Gematria Equals: 119 ( h8 e5 b2 r 18 e5 w 23 0 c3 a1 l 12 e5 n 14 d4 a1 r 18
mary magdalene in Simple Gematria Equals: 119 ( m 13 a1 r 18 y 25 0 m 13 a1 g7 d4 a1 l 12 e5 n 14 e5  
Resultado de imagen para MAGDALENE NEW MEXICO


First  Previous  2 a 10 de 10  Next   Last  
Previous subject  Next subject
 
©2024 - Gabitos - All rights reserved