Página principal  |  Contacto  

Correo electrónico:

Contraseña:

Registrarse ahora!

¿Has olvidado tu contraseña?

Secreto Masonico
 
Novedades
  Únete ahora
  Panel de mensajes 
  Galería de imágenes 
 Archivos y documentos 
 Encuestas y Test 
  Lista de Participantes
 EL SECRETO DE LA INICIACIÓN 
 Procesos Secretos del Alma 
 Estructura Secreta del Ritual Masónico 
 Los extraños Ritos de Sangre 
 Cámara de Reflexiones 
 
 
  Herramientas
 
General: HITLER MADELEINE FRANCE
Elegir otro panel de mensajes
Tema anterior  Tema siguiente
Respuesta  Mensaje 1 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999  (Mensaje original) Enviado: 07/01/2024 20:35



Primer  Anterior  39 a 53 de 68  Siguiente   Último 
Respuesta  Mensaje 39 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 14/01/2025 16:46

 
Batalla de Austerlitz
Tercera Coalición
Parte de guerras napoleónicas

Napoleón en la batalla de Austerlitz, óleo de François Gérard.
Fecha 2 de diciembre de 1805
Lugar Bandera de Imperio austríaco AusterlitzImperio austríaco
(actual Slavkov u BrnaBandera de República Checa República Checa)
Coordenadas 49°07′41″N 16°45′45″E
Resultado Bandera de Francia Decisiva victoria francesa
Consecuencias
Beligerantes
Bandera de Francia Imperio francés Bandera de Imperio austríaco Imperio austríaco
Bandera de Rusia Imperio ruso
Comandantes
 Napoleón I
Bandera de Francia Jean-Baptiste Bessières
 Francisco I
Bandera de Imperio austríaco Von Weyrother
 Alejandro I
Bandera de Rusia Mijaíl Kutúzov
Fuerzas en combate
Bandera de Francia 72 000N 1 Bandera de Imperio austríacoBandera de Rusia 85 000N 2
Bajas
1305 muertos,
6940 heridos,
573 capturados,
1 estandarte perdido1
15 000 muertos y heridos,
12 000 capturados,
180 cañones y
50 estandartes perdidos1

Respuesta  Mensaje 40 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 14/01/2025 17:24
Batalla de Austerlitz conocida tambiem como la Batalla de los 3 Emperadores.

Respuesta  Mensaje 41 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/01/2025 19:53
Battle of Austerlitz
Part of the War of the Third Coalition

Battle of Austerlitz, 2 December 1805, romanticized painting by French artist François Gérardc. 1810
Date 2 December 1805
Location 49°07′41″N 16°45′45″E
Result French victory
Territorial
changes
Dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire and creation of the Confederation of the Rhine
Belligerents

 French Empire

Commanders and leaders
Units involved
Strength
65,000–75,000[a] 73,000–89,000[b]
Casualties and losses
  • Total: 8,852
  • 1,288 killed[6]
  • 6,991 wounded[6]
  • 573 captured[7]
  • Total: 27,000–36,000
  • 15,000–16,000 killed or wounded[7][8]
  • 12,000–20,000 captured[7][8]
Battle of Austerlitz is located in Europe
Battle of Austerlitz
Location within Europe

Respuesta  Mensaje 42 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 05/02/2025 16:05
Biden on D-Day: West won't abandon Ukraine

Respuesta  Mensaje 43 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 19/02/2025 17:20
Book Review – Hitler's Time Machine | Defense Media Network
Pin on RIsas de Instagram
Lunar landings: Shock claims of Nazi moon landing from Antarctica base |  Weird | News | Express.co.uk

Respuesta  Mensaje 44 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 01/03/2025 21:16

Las desventuras de Pedro de Mendoza: de los sueños de riqueza al canibalismo, la sífilis y la muerte en alta mar

De su propio bolsillo armó una expedición con la idea quedarse con grandes extensiones de tierras. Pero cuando partió de España ya estaba enfermo y nada saldría según lo planeado. La crónica de un sueño que terminó en desastre

Guardar
 
Pedro de Mendoza estuvo alPedro de Mendoza estuvo al frente de una importante expedición al Río de la Plata, que él costeó de su bolsillo (Ministerio de Cultura)

Sabía que tenía los días contados cuando abordó la carabela La Magdalena. Junto al galeón Santantón y 150 hombres partió del Río de la Plata el 22 de abril de 1537. Enfermo, sin poder abandonar su camastro, Pedro de Mendoza había decidido regresar a España. Detrás dejaba una expedición en la que no encontró civilizaciones con inmensas riquezas para saquear ni tampoco pudo dar con una ruta hacia el Pacífico.

Eran tiempos en que se jugaba una carrera contrarreloj entre españoles y portugueses para hacerse de los territorios de ultramar, que pensaban que explotaban de riquezas de todo tipo. Mendoza le propuso al rey Carlos I lanzarse a la conquista.

Nacido en 1499 en el seno de una familia aristocrática, había empezado como paje en la corte y fue gracias a su padre que Pedro fue nombrado caballero.

Ulrico Schmidl era un soldadoUlrico Schmidl era un soldado alemán que escribiría un sorprendente relato de esos años de conquista (Grabado de la edición de Levinus Hulsius, 1599)

Supo hacerse de una posición y de fortuna después de participar del saqueo de Roma en 1527 en el marco de la guerra entre los Estados Pontificios y el Sacro Imperio Romano Germánico.

La expedición

El monarca español estaba en una encrucijada: era consciente que no podía quedar atrás respecto a los portugueses en la conquista de tierras de ultramar, pero los fondos escaseaban. Por eso recibió con los brazos abiertos la propuesta que Mendoza le hizo en 1534. El navegante se ofreció a costear de su propio bolsillo una expedición.

A través de la Capitulación de Toledo del 21 de mayo de 1534 el rey lo nombró adelantado con atribuciones militares y de fundador.

Mendoza estaba en una excelente posición económica que esperaba superar. Con derechos a quedarse con la mitad de los tesoros que encontrase, debía tomar posesión de las tierras que se distribuían entre lo que hoy es Buenos Aires y Asunción del Paraguay.

Paisaje irreconocible. La artista LéoniePaisaje irreconocible. La artista Léonie Matthis recreó el reparto de tierras durante la segunda fundación, llevada adelante por Juan de Garay

La noche del 24 de agosto de 1535 partió de Sanlúcar de Barrameda con 16 barcos, cerca de 2000 hombres y un centenar de caballos y yeguas. Fueron de la partida una decena de sacerdotes, el médico Hernando Zamora y el cirujano Pedro Gómez. Viajaban muchos parientes de Mendoza y otros personajes como Carlos Dubrín, hermano de leche de Carlos I y Rodrigo de Cepeda y Ahumada, hermano de Santa Teresa de Jesús.

La mayoría de la tripulación estaba conformada por alemanes, neerlandeses y sajones, y según las crónicas iban seis mujeres.

Mendoza ya estaba enfermo, de lo que entonces se conocía como “mal napolitano” o “morbo gálico”, que es como se conocía entonces a la sífilis, que había contraído en sus correrías por Roma. Con su cuerpo cubierto de llagas, padeció el cruce del Atlántico encerrado en su camarote.

El médico Hernán Zamora no se despegó de su lado y tenía el dato que en América crecía la planta Guayacán, para tratar esta enfermedad. Lo que ignoraba el doctor es que crecía en zonas tropicales, no en el Río de la Plata.

Recreación de uno de losRecreación de uno de los tantos enfrentamientos entre los españoles y los querandíes, tal como lo vio Schmidl

El hombre no la pasó bien. Frente a las costas de Brasil, en noviembre de ese año, enfrentó un violento temporal. Uno de los barcos se hundió muriendo toda su tripulación, y algunos hombres aprovecharon para desertar. Su hermano Diego, a quien había nombrado almirante y era el responsable de guiar a la flota, se las arregló para volver a reunir a los barcos y continuar viaje hacia el Río de la Plata, adonde llegó previa escala en las costas uruguayas.

Hasta recuperarse, el Adelantado había delegado el mando a su segundo, Juan Osorio, el jefe de la infantería. Este hombre, de 25 años quien, al ver que el jefe no estaba en condiciones de mandar, pretendió desplazarlo. Luego de una dura disputa con Diego Mendoza, Osorio terminó asesinado.

Los “buenos ayres”

El 2 o el 3 de febrero de 1536 Mendoza estableció un asentamiento en las cercanías de lo que hoy es Paseo Colón y Humberto 1°, aunque otros autores dicen que fue mucho más cerca de la Vuelta de Rocha, pegado al Riachuelo, por la actual avenida Almirante Brown, al que tomó como puerto natural y como un sitio adecuado para proteger a sus naves.

Mendoza levantó un modesto fuerte que llamó Real de Santa María del Buen Aire, nombre que aludía a una cofradía de marineros de la isla de Cerdeña. Para algunos historiadores fue la primera fundación de Buenos Aires, aunque otros no lo interpretaron así.

El español desmanteló algunos barcos para modificarlos a bergantines para navegar el curso del río. Creía que al final del viaje llegaría al Pacífico.

En los festejos por losEn los festejos por los 400 años de la primera fundación, realizados en la Vuelta de Rocha el 2 de febrero de 1936, uno de los protagonistas fue Pedro de Mendoza (Caras y Caretas)

Pero con el buen aire no podía alimentar a su tripulación. En los primeros días los querandíes, que se mostraron amistosos, les llevaron carne y pescado. Los españoles los llamaron indios pampas.

Hambre y privaciones

Según las crónicas de Ulrico Schmidl, miembro de la expedición, el hambre era tal, que comían toda clase de animales, insectos e incluso el cuero de los zapatos. En una oportunidad, tres hombres robaron un caballo, lo mataron y se lo comieron. Cuando fueron descubiertos, se los ahorcó. A los cuerpos aún colgados de la horca, les cortaron los muslos y los brazos y los cocinaron.

Un día los indígenas dejaron de enviar comida. Entonces Mendoza comisionó al alcalde Juan Pavón y a dos soldados a que recorrieran las cuatro leguas que los separaban de las tolderías para reclamar los alimentos.

No se sabe qué ocurrió. Aparentemente los españoles no se comportaron con corrección porque los indígenas los molieron a palos. Mendoza ordenó darles un escarmiento.

El 15 de junio de 1536, día de Corpus Christi, el adelantado comisionó a su hermano Diego con 300 soldados de infantería y una treintena de jinetes bien armados. Llevaba la orden de matar a los indios y apoderarse de sus tierras.

Pero los indígenas los estaban esperando. Ya no era un grupo reducido. Habían reunido a tribus amigas y, según Schmidl, eran cerca de cuatro mil hombres armados con flechas con punta de piedra y lanzas.

Durante el combate, unos veinte españoles de infantería y media docena de caballeros murieron a flechazos, y cerca de mil indígenas cayeron por las armas de fuego de los europeos. Al caballo de Diego de Mendoza lo derribaron con unas piedras sujetas a un cordel y, ya en el piso, lo mataron.

Siempre según la historia oficial, los indígenas huyeron y los españoles, que no pudieron tomar cautivos, se apoderaron de esas tierras. En el lugar hallaron cueros de nutrias, pescado, harina y manteca de pescado. En el río de la zona descubrieron que la pesca era abundante.

Este combate se habría desarrollado cerca del actual río Matanza que, cuando cruza la avenida General Paz, se transforma en el Riachuelo. Para algunos es el origen del nombre de lo que se transformaría en el partido más populoso del conurbano.

Volver a España

Pedro de Mendoza ya no sentía con fuerzas para seguir adelante con la expedición. Su enfermedad se agravaba cada vez más. Delegó el mando en Francisco Ruiz Galán y se embarcó para regresar a España. En estas tierras Galán y los hombres que quedaron -entre ellos un médico genovés, Blas Testanova- terminarían incorporándose a la colonización del Paraguay, al mando de Juan de Ayolas y Salazar, cuando éste llegó al Río de la Plata. Solo quedaron una docena de caballos que se dispersaron y se multiplicaron en el campo, y para 1541 solo quedaban ruinas de lo que había levantado Mendoza.

El viaje de regreso fue un martirio. No solo por su enfermedad, sino por la escasez de alimentos. Además, fuertes vientos hicieron desorientar al galeón Santantón que terminó en Santo Domingo.

A los 400 años tambiénA los 400 años también se recreó la carabela La Magdalena, la nave de Mendoza (Caras y Caretas)

Mendoza era atendido por su médico Hernando de Zamora, quien, a esa altura, se había transformado en su amigo y en un hombre de confianza con quien compartía las decisiones que tomaba.

En su camarote reunió fuerzas para redactar entre el 11 y el 13 de junio su testamento, donde estipuló el reparto de sus bienes entre su familia e iglesias. El 23 de junio, al suroeste de las islas de Cabo Verde, falleció. Al día siguiente, el día de San Juan, arrojaron al mar su cuerpo y sus sueños truncos de riquezas y gloria.

https://www.infobae.com/historia/2024/06/23/las-desventuras-de-pedro-de-mendoza-de-los-suenos-de-riqueza-al-canibalismo-la-sifilis-y-la-muerte-en-alta-mar/

Respuesta  Mensaje 45 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 11/03/2025 18:00

Magdalena of Austria

Are the Habsburgs Catholic?

As is so often the case, the answer is: “That depends.” While the Habsburg family guaranteed the presence of Catholicism in Europe for nearly a thousand years, there were ups and downs in their “Catholicity.” For example, after the death of Rudolph, archbishop of Olmütz (1788–1831), for almost two hundred years there were no priestly vocations in this “most Catholic of clans” until my own brother Paul became a priest in the 1990s—and not for a lack of young men.

nYet every now and then you discover a family member whose life is a shining example of Catholic faith. I recently learned that Blessed Emperor Karl is not the only Habsburg on the path to sainthood; we also have a sixteenth-century archduchess who is Venerable. The Archduchess Magdalena, born in 1532, was the fourth daughter among the fifteen children of Emperor Ferdinand I. The children were instructed in the Catholic faith from an early age. Magdalena’s mother, Anne of Bohemia and Hungary, entrusted her and several of her sisters to a governess, the devout Countess Thurn. She encouraged the countess to have little Magdalena carried to Holy Mass every day, even as a baby in her cradle. As Magdalena grew, she continued to attend daily Mass with her sisters. She exhibited great piety in her youth and regularly prayed in front of a crucifix that can still be seen today in the Spitalskirche in Innsbruck.

Anne died when Magdalena was only fourteen. From then on, Magdalena became like a mother to her two younger sisters, Margareta and Helena. Magdalena also loved to make pilgrimages to chapels and shrines dedicated to Our Lady, as well as to the site of a eucharistic miracle in Tyrol. Beautiful and bright, Magdalena was fluent in German, Italian, and Latin. This would come in handy later in life.n

Magdalena’s father, Ferdinand, intended to marry her off. But Magdalena and her younger sisters wanted to remain unmarried and create a community of pious women. Fortunately, Magdalena had a saint for an ally. In the early 1560s the famous Jesuit preacher Peter Canisius became Magdalena’s confessor and helped her spiritual vocation to mature. In 1563, through his intercession and that of her sister Anna (who had married the Duke of Bavaria), she begged for her father’s permission to found the new community. He twice refused. Undeterred, Magdalena continued to pray and write to Prague, where her father’s court resided. In the end, her father acquiesced. Around this time, the Italian master Arcimboldo painted his now famous portrait of the archduchess.n

After her father’s death in 1564, Magdalena and Helena made a vow of virginity. In 1567, Magdalena founded the Haller Stift, a royal convent in the Austrian town of Hall in Tyrol where both aristocratic and bourgeois women could serve God under Jesuit direction. Magdalena worked untiringly to help the poor and orphans in Hall, and to form and educate the youth (in part to combat the influence of Protestant thought).

Magdalena also wrote for her community a rule of life for growth in prayer and holiness. The ladies began an intense prayer regime from the moment they awoke each day. Those who could read prayed the Little Office of Our Lady, while those with lesser reading skills prayed the full Rosary (the joyful, sorrowful, and glorious mysteries). They assisted each day at three Masses, one of which was always offered for the poor souls in Purgatory. Magdalena was very strict about arriving on time to Mass; if she was ever late to Mass herself, she would spend the entire time kneeling outside. When they weren’t praying, the women cared for the sick and worked with their hands. Some of the priestly vestments and altar cloths embroidered by Magdalena can still be admired today.

n

Magdalena at eighteen

But Magdalena’s greatest gift was her devotion to the Blessed Sacrament. In the spirit of the Council of Trent, she spent many hours praying before our Lord. Through her personal piety she managed to win back many priests who, in the confusion of the Reformation, had abandoned their vocation. With her help, they returned to the right path.

Not all Habsburgs were pious Catholics. Magdalena’s brother Maximilian II was very tolerant toward Protestantism, stopped going to Holy Mass halfway through his reign, and even renounced Last Rites before his death in 1576. His son Rudolph II dabbled in astrology, alchemy, and esoteric arts in his castle in Prague, and rejected confession as he lay dying. Their politics in matters of faith were catastrophic from a Catholic viewpoint and led to a dramatic situation in the empire. By the mid-sixteenth century, up to 90 percent of the empire’s population had—in name or behavior—become Protestant, including priests and aristocrats. The famous monasteries along the Danube were closing left and right. Something had to be done.

When Papal Legate Jerome de Porcia arrived in Innsbruck on behalf of Pope Gregory XIII to convince the Habsburgs to embark upon the important work of the Counter-Reformation, he knew he could not rely on the lukewarm Emperor Maximilian II. He therefore went directly to Magdalena in Hall. This was the greatest moment in Magdalena’s spiritual life. First, she went to her brother, Archduke Ferdinand. He listened to her and in turn convinced Archduke Carl II, their brother, to take up the cause. With her sister Anna on her side, Magdalena was able to initiate the so-called Munich Conference in October 1579, which brought together archdukes Ferdinand, Carl, Duke Wilhelm of Bavaria, and the Papal Legate Porcia. Together they hammered out a fascinating agreement (Münchner Beschlüsse) that was a step-by-step plan on how to bring the Austrian countries back to the Catholic faith. Without this conference, there would be far fewer Catholics in Austria today.

Magdalena died in 1590. Years later, two more Habsburg nieces followed in her footsteps and entered the same house. The Haller Stift existed for 216 years. Unfortunately, on July 9, 1783, Emperor Joseph II dissolved it and left its church desecrated, as part of his campaign to eradicate monastic life (a total of 1,300 monasteries were suppressed). In the centuries that followed, the convent would eventually become a Sparkasse bank—until 1915, when Blessed Emperor Karl rededicated the monastery and invited a new order of nuns from Belgium—the Daughters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus—to reside in the same sacred space where his saintly ancestor had lived 350 years before. Adoration of the Most Blessed Sacrament continues at this convent even today.

When the monastery was rededicated, the initial steps were also taken in Magdalena’s process of beatification. Sadly, this process is presently dormant, but perhaps, with the help of your prayers and with Magdalena’s intercession, we might get it moving again. I include a beautiful prayer for her beatification and intercession, translated from the original German, below.

Most kind and gracious Jesus,

nYou granted your servant Magdalena of Austria the grace to renounce all worldly honor and wealth and to long only for heavenly riches. Inspired and supported by your grace, she worked constantly for the salvation of souls, by fighting false doctrines and persevering in the true faith.

nShe instructed the young, cared for the poor and the sick, and above all promoted adoration of your true presence in the most holy eucharist. Beloved Jesus, your servant Magdalena assisted so many during her life by her actions and after her death continues to come to the aid of those who invoke her intercession. We beseech you to show forth the power of her intercession by granting miracles to those who call upon her. Hasten the day when your servant Magdalena will be counted among the blessed, and when our suffering fatherland will have a new intercessor, patroness, and protectress. Amen.

Eduard Habsburg is Hungary’s ambassador to the Holy See.

First Things depends on its subscribers and supporters. Join the conversation and make a contribution today.

Click here to make a donation.

Click here to subscribe to First Things.

https://firstthings.com/magdalena-of-austria/

Respuesta  Mensaje 46 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 12/03/2025 17:50

María Magdalena de Austria

 
 
 
María Magdalena de Austria-Estiria
Gran duquesa consorte de Toscana

Retrato de María Magdalena por Tiberio Titi (c. 1610), en la Galería Uffizi.
Reinado
17 de febrero de 1609-28 de febrero de 1621
Predecesor Cristina de Lorena
Sucesor Victoria della Rovere
Información personal
Otros títulos
Nacimiento 7 de octubre de 1589
Bandera de Sacro Imperio Romano Germánico GrazDucado de EstiriaSacro Imperio Romano Germánico
Fallecimiento 1 de noviembre de 1631 (42 años)
Bandera de la República de Venecia PaduaRepública de Venecia
Sepultura Capilla de los Médici en la Basílica de San LorenzoFlorencia
Familia
Casa real Habsburgo
Padre Carlos II de Estiria
Madre María Ana de Baviera
Consorte Cosme II de Médici

María Magdalena de Habsburgo y Wittelsbach (Graz, 7 de octubre de 1589-Padua, 1 de noviembre de 1631) fue la esposa de Cosme II de Médici, gran duque de Toscana.

 Biografía

[editar]

Era hija de Carlos II de Estiriaarchiduque de Austria, y de María Ana de Baviera. El matrimonio con el gran duque tuvo lugar en 1608. Después de la prematura muerte de su marido, acaecida en 1621, se dedicó junto a su suegra, Cristina de Lorena, a la educación de sus hijos, en particular del futuro gran duque Fernando II. Obtuvo además como herencia el gobierno de la ciudad de San Miniato hasta su muerte y no paró hasta que la pequeña ciudad se convirtió en diócesis.

Se interesó por la ciencia y procuró a sus hijos una gran educación, eligiendo como preceptores a algunos científicos discípulos de Galileo Galilei.

Descendencia

[editar]
NombreNacimientoMuerteReferencias
María Cristina 1609 1632 Nacida deforme y retrasada, fue recluida en el convento de las Monjas de San Esteban llamado de la Santissima Concezione, en 1619, pero no tomó nunca los hábitos.
Fernando II 1610 1670 Se casó con Victoria della Rovere.
Giancarlo 1611 1663 Fue ordenado cardenal en 1644.
Margarita 1612 1679 Se casó el 11 de octubre de 1628 con Eduardo I Farnesio, duque de Parma.
Matías 1613 1667 Militar y gobernador de Siena. Combatió en la guerra de los Treinta Años.
Francisco 1614 1634 Militar, murió soltero.
Ana 1616 1676 Se casó el 10 de junio de 1646 con Fernando Carlos, archiduque de Austria.
Leopoldo 1617 1675 Fue ordenado cardenal en 1667.

Ancestros

[editar]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16. Maximiliano I del Sacro Imperio Romano Germánico
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8. Felipe I de Castilla
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17. María de Borgoña
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. Fernando I del Sacro Imperio Romano Germánico
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18. Fernando II de Aragón
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9. Juana I de Castilla
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19. Isabel I de Castilla
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2. Carlos II de Estiria
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20. Casimiro IV de Polonia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10. Vladislao II de Bohemia y Hungría
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21. Isabel de Habsburgo de Hungría
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5. Ana Jagellón de Hungría y Bohemia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22. Gastón II de Foix-Candale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11. Ana de Foix-Candale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23. Catalina de Foix
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1. María Magdalena de Habsburgo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24. Alberto IV de Baviera
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. Guillermo IV de Baviera
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25. Cunegunda de Austria
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6. Alberto V de Baviera
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26. Felipe I de Baden
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13. María Jacoba de Baden
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27. Isabel del Palatinado
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3. María Ana de Baviera
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28. Felipe I de Castilla (= 8)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14. Fernando I del Sacro Imperio Romano Germánico (= 4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29. Juana I de Castilla (= 9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7. Ana de Habsburgo-Jagellón
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30. Vladislao II de Bohemia y Hungría (= 10)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15. Ana Jagellón de Hungría y Bohemia (= 5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31. Ana de Foix-Candale (= 11)
 
 
 
 
 
 

Respuesta  Mensaje 47 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 27/03/2025 03:27
La penúltima batalla por el Santo Grial - XL Semanal
La lance de Longinus, centurion romain : la vérité historique sur la  légende d'une arme aux pouvoirs effarants - Pierre Chély - Librairie Mollat  Bordeaux
La lance du destin - Trevor Ravenscroft - Babelio
The Mark of the Beast: The Continuing Story of the Spear of Destiny -  Ravenscroft, Trevor; Wallace-Murphy, Tim: 9780806513225 - AbeBooks
The Mark of the Beast: The Continuing Story of the Spear of Destiny de  Ravenscroft, Trevor; Wallace-Murphy, Tim: Very Good Soft cover (1997) First  Edition Paperback | beat book shop
Spear of Destiny: The Occult Power Behind the Spear Which Pierced the Side  of Christ - Ravenscroft, Trevor: 9780747405139 - IberLibro
The Spear of Destiny
Nazi Quest for the Holy Grail - Forbidden History - History Documentary
The Spear of Destiny: The Occult Power Behind the Spear which Pierced the  Side of Christ - Audiobook - Trevor Ravenscroft - ISBN 9781666638301 -  Storytel International

Respuesta  Mensaje 48 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 27/03/2025 03:43
Hitler Items by Logan Willis

Respuesta  Mensaje 49 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 27/03/2025 03:49
Hitler's Holy Relics by Sidney Kirkpatrick (Ebook) - Read free for 30 days

Respuesta  Mensaje 50 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 27/03/2025 05:31
Hitler's Daughter: French, Jackie: 9780060086527: Amazon.com: Books

Respuesta  Mensaje 51 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 15/04/2025 13:47

It is said that Paris esoterically derives its name from 'Par Isis' ('near Isis'). There is a lot of evidence to support this. As Robert Bauval writes in Secret Chamber (p.341):

Napoleon had acquired two nicknames, one being 'L'Aigle' (the Eagle) and the other being 'L'Etoile' (the Star). That 'his star' was Sirius, the star of Isis, is not only made obvious by the coat-of-arms which he chose for Paris but, in a more arcane manner, it seems to have been linked to Napoleon's most famous monument, the Arc de Triomphe, also known as the the Place de L'Etoile (the Place of the Star), located on the western side of the so-called Historical Axis of Paris, better known as the Champs-Elysees, [which is oriented twenty-six degrees north of west]... The star Sirius, as seen from the latitude of Paris, rises twenty-six degrees south of east.

And sure enough the 'Axis of Paris' (the Champs Elysees) was designed to align with the sunset on ~August 6.

This first of all confirms that the date is to be seen as a special day of Sirius' rising, and makes it clear that August 6 is a 'magical date' that is considered very important by past and modern 'esotericists' whose knowledge stems from ancient Egypt. Judging from the 'rise of Schwarzenegger' masterfully brought about on this date in 2003, we can infer that there is something big underway at this time. The encoded symbolism of the Osirian resurrection - or the birth of Horus - should therefore be treated seriously. Indeed, we just may be talking about something akin to the 'rise of Antichrist' here, if that gets your attention... Think Napoleon; think Hitler.

Napoleon is often thought to have been an 'antichristic' figure especially in the context of Nostradamus' prophecies. We often hear that he was 'Antichrist 1', Hitler was 'Antichrist 2', and the third has yet to come... Well, Terminator 3 was in theaters last year just before Schwarzenegger's rise in politics. So we wonder: Was 'Terminator 3' an allusion to 'Antichrist 3'? The answer we find here is amusing and ominous.

The following passage is from the Book of Revelation, apparently talking about an antichristic figure:

And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

The two names given here, 'Abaddon' and 'Apollyon', both mean the same thing - 'Destroyer'... or even 'Terminator'! And Arnold is not only the Hollywood 'Terminator', he's also been Conan the Destroyer (1984)! The name 'Napoleon' has also been interpreted to mean none other than 'destroyer'... The parallel goes even further as we find that just as Napoleon had the nickname 'the Eagle', the name 'Arnold' means 'eagle rules'.

So, yes - the title 'Terminator 3' does scream 'Antichrist 3'... at least on a symbolic level.

What's more ominous, the chapter/verse number of the Revelation passage above from the New Testament happens to be... 9:11. We are about to see just how fitting this 'coincidental' reference is.

https://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/lucifer-timecode.htm

Respuesta  Mensaje 52 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 22/04/2025 03:47
Hitler and the Church:  Where was God?

Hitler and the Church: Where was God?

Europe and North America in 1939 were very religious continents. People in general looked for divine answers to world affairs and natural phenomena. But it was a much different type of religious landscape than today. Most denominations in Europe and America in 1939 were subject to hellfire-and-brimstone preaching bursting with anti-Semitic piffle. Today, most churches, especially non-denominational mega churches in North America, preach the prosperity gospel (the Protestant movement in Europe right now is largely dead). Most of these churches are pro-Israel for questionable reasons of their own and donate millions to this cause, which is dramatically different than the churches of pre-WWII Europe. The Catholic Church in 1939 preached the doctrine of damnation, exclusivity and Jew-hatred, especially since it had not yet gone through the reformations of Vatican II in the 1960’s. Today, the Catholic Church is being led by Pope Francis who mostly preaches love and acceptance. Since Vatican II, the Church has often met with Jewish leaders, and Pope Francis, who counts an Argentine rabbi as among his closest friends, made a special trip to Israel in 2014 expressing friendship and peace. As a result, many today conflate current attitudes by Protestants and Catholics with how they behaved in the past. They assume that these religious groups in Europe in 1939 should have been fighting the Nazis and helping Jews. The reality was unfortunately the opposite in most cases. This is an important fact to acknowledge because without knowing what the religious climate was like in Europe during WWII, one cannot truly understand why Christians in general and the Catholic Church and Protestant movements in particular were incapable or unwilling to stop Adolf Hitler—in fact, most German Catholics and Protestants supported the Nazi dictator.

When giving lectures on my book “The Rabbi Saved by Hitler’s Soldiers,” people often ask why Jews didn’t go to the Catholic Church or a powerful Protestant denomination for help against the Nazis. The answer quite simply was that the vast majority of Christian leaders would not have been sympathetic to the Jews and would not have troubled themselves to effectuate their rescue. And with the storm brewing in Europe in the 1930s, many religious leaders were doing all they could to take care of their own flocks, the majority of whom were scared by world events and concerned about their family’s safety. People were suffering from the lingering effects of WWI and the Great Depression, so many looked to their religious leaders for guidance for their own problems as the world spun out of control. Some in America thought they had entered the End Times and that the Second Coming was imminent. Many claimed Hitler was the anti-Christ. However, in Germany and Italy, many felt God was on their side and that the Lord was blessing them with an empire and riches. Germany was grabbing land all over Europe and Italy had succeeded in taking over Ethiopia.

The invasion of Poland in 1939 met with the enthusiastic approbation of the German population, which was strongly Christian. The Evangelical Church in Germany issued an official appeal the day after the attack “for Germans to support the invasion to ‘recover German blood’ for the fatherland.” The Catholic hierarchy, whose flock made up about a third of Germany’s population, encouraged and admonished “Catholic soldiers, in obedience to the Führer, to do their duty and to be ready to sacrifice their lives.” Why was the Catholic Church inside Germany so supportive of Hitler? Well, in short, the Church had had a history of supporting fascist regimes.

Pope Pius XI, an autocrat in his own right who was plagued by scandals involving pedophile priests as close advisors, had actively backed Benito Mussolini and his fascists in taking over the Italian government in 1922 and in maintaining power in Italy. David Kertzer wrote that the fascist movement became a “cleric-Fascist revolution.” The Pope felt confident that the fascists would restore privileges and powers the Church had lost under the democratic government. He hated the Protestants’ “individual rights and religious freedom,” and felt Mussolini would support him in suppressing these movements. He desired to bring about the “Kingdom of Christ on earth,” and Mussolini would be a tool in his strategy. At rallies, priests would sing praises to il Duce as the “Savior of our land.” Any priest vaguely critical of Mussolini, for example, Giovanni Montini who later became Pope Paul VI, was reported to Vatican authorities and disciplined. The Church and the Italian population cast Mussolini as a “Christ-like figure,” and children in Catholic schools recited prayers daily that said: “I believe in the high Duce—maker of the Black Shirts—And in Jesus Christ his only protector.” The Church hierarchy was just as supportive of Hitler as it was of Mussolini.

When Nazi Germany forcibly annexed Austria in 1938, Vienna’s Cardinal Theodor Innitzer met with Hitler. Cardinal Innitzer supported the Nazi takeover in a statement he had read in church and had church bells rung and swastikas displayed in celebration and greeting of the German army. “Those who are entrusted with souls of the faithful will unconditionally support the great German State and the Führer… obviously accompanied by the blessings of Providence.” The statement ended with “Heil Hitler.” The archbishops of Salzburg and Graz followed the Cardinal’s lead.

This did not stop the Nazis from confiscating church property, closing Catholic organizations, and sending a number of priests to Dachau concentration camp. “Pius XI was surprised, appalled and embarrassed by Mussolini’s meek acceptance of the Nazi takeover.” Furthermore, he was also “furious” at Cardinal Innitzer who seemed to be acting on his own without asking for Papal approval. While the Vatican daily newspaper and radio criticized the statements of the archbishops, Vatican State Secretary Pacelli (the future Pope Pius XII) told the German ambassador that the criticism was not official and the Pope knew nothing about it. In other words, Pacelli encouraged Hitler to act with a free hand.

As time passed, Pope Pius XI became more uneasy with Mussolini, and he had a much more critical view of Hitler with whom he passed a controversial and often violated Concordat in 1933. One could argue that his understanding of Mussolini and Hitler came way too late—he should have seen their evil before supporting them for years. But by the time the Germans invaded Poland, Pope Pius XI was dead and Pope Pius XII, who as Papal Nuncio in Germany actually negotiated the Concordat in 1933, was in power, and he was a supporter of Hitler. He had gotten to know the Nazis well during his stay in Berlin.

Therefore, the Catholic Church did not protest the invasion of Poland, an overwhelmingly Roman Catholic country. Instead, it reaffirmed the Pope’s encyclical Summi Pontificatus from October 1939 that adopted a strict neutrality in the face of the violence spreading across the European continent. Inside Germany, religious newspapers, both Protestant and Catholic, claimed that Germans were fighting for essential Lebensraum. A very religious nation, most Germans felt God was on their side.

This religious support for Hitler should not be surprising. Most religious leaders inside the Reich supported Hitler and felt God had blessed him. Lutheran Bishop Hans Meiser prayed in 1937, “We thank you Lord, for every success… you have so far granted [Hitler] for the good of our people.” Many churches extolled Hitler as the defender of Germany and, by extension, “Christianity from godless Bolshevism.” The Roman Catholic dioceses had Church bells “rung as a joyful salute on Hitler’s birthday on 20 April 1939 with prayers for the Führer to be said at the following Sunday mass.” The Catholic primate, Cardinal Adolf Bertram, sent him a personal greetings telegram.

Leading Protestant church scholars and leaders including Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althaus, and Emmanuel Hirsch supported Hitler and felt that God stood behind him. Hitler had carefully groomed many of these leaders from the beginning of his rule when he appealed to God in a nationwide broadcast in 1933 that the rebirth of Germany would be founded on Christianity. Hanns Kerrl, Reichsminister of Protestant Church Affairs, was a Nazi party member since 1923 and offered to donate all church property to the State, “and make Hitler its ‘supreme head’ and Summus Episcopus.” There were a few brave dissenting Protestant leaders, like Martin Niemöller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer of the Confessing Church, who did resist the Nazis, but unfortunately, they were a tiny minority. And many of them, at first, did not see the danger. Pastor Niemöller was initially a Nazi Party member and supporter of Hitler. After a few years of Nazi rule, he saw how dangerous Hitler was and changed his mind, but he was a member of a small group who did so. Quite simply put, most Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, in Germany supported Hitler and his regime. Moreover, many Christian Germans felt that God had sent the Nazis to provide Germany protection from Bolshevism and to reclaim lands lost to nations viewed as illegitimate, such as Poland.

When Hitler conquered Poland, why did the Pope Pius XII not condemn Hitler’s invasion? Pius XII was elected Pope in March 1939, and he supported much of what Hitler had been doing. “Believers are supposed to hold that the Pope is the Vicar of Christ on earth, and the keeper of the keys of Saint Peter. They of course are free to believe this, and to believe that God decides when to end the tenure of one Pope or (more important) to inaugurate the tenure of another.” This belief would indicate that it was God’s will that a few months before the invasion of 1939, a pro-fascist but anti-Nazi Pope, Pius XI, died with an unsigned Encyclical condemning racism on his nightstand and was replaced by more pro-Nazi pope, Pius XII. What was God telling Catholics in this moment?

Also a good percentage (25 percent) of the SS who persecuted Poles so extensively were practicing Catholics and the rest were largely Protestant. Most of the SS leadership was Catholic. Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heydrich, who led the SS, were both Catholics. The brutal commandant of Auschwitz SS—Obersturmbannführer Rudolf Höss—was raised in a strong Catholic family. In the end, “Catholics engaged in the extermination processes were never told specifically by their clergy that they were doing wrong.”

And not only practicing Catholics were part of these horrible movements, but priests also pursued power, implemented Nazi policies and created fascist governments. For example, the head of the Nazi Puppet State of Slovakia was a fascist in holy orders, Father Jozef Tiso. No Catholic has ever been “threatened with excommunication for participating in war crimes” according to journalist Christopher Hitchens. Hitler proudly told his army adjutant Gerhard Engel, “I shall remain a Catholic forever.” Since the Catholic Church has still not excommunicated him, maybe he was right (the Church could retrospectively declare that Hitler should have incurred excommunication during his lifetime, but it has not done so). Interestingly enough, after Hitler’s conquest of Austria in 1938, Mussolini, who was still feeling somewhat uneasy at Hitler’s growing power although allied with him, told a confidential Vatican go-between that the one man who could stop Hitler was the Pope. “By excommunicating Hitler, he could isolate the Führer and cripple the Nazis… [T]he Pope never seriously considered following the suggestion.” As Paul Johnson tragically notes: “The Church excommunicated Catholics who laid down in their wills that they wished to be cremated… but it did not forbid them to work in concentration or death camps.”

Besides Catholics making up the majority of SS and Nazi leadership, one needs to observe that most fascist totalitarian regimes of the 20th century were led by Catholic men like Hitler, Mussolini, Spain’s Francisco Franco, Portugal’s António Salazar and Croatia’s Ante Pavelić. They enjoyed support from the Church and derived much of their childhood education from the Church. “As for the Jews,” Hitler told Catholic Bishop Wilhelm Berning of Osnabrück, “I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic Church had adopted for 1,500 years.” “At no point were Catholics given, either by their own hierarchy or by Rome, the relaxation from their moral obligation to obey the legitimate authority of the Nazi rulers, which had been imposed on them by the 1933 directives of the hierarchy. Nor did the bishops ever tell them officially that the regime was evil, or even mistaken” according to historian Paul Johnson.

In the context of WWII, when one asks why so many Catholics were involved with the killing of Jews and why the Church in Rome did hardly anything to help the Jews or protest the German invasion of the Catholic country Poland, one can simply reply that this was its modus operandi during this time. One might point to their education and religious practices as causing much of the foundational conditioning of society that gave birth to genocidal maniacs in Germany. And it was unfortunately not only Catholics, but also many Protestants who had picked up much of their antisemitism from their religious traditions. “There was no explaining away,” Donald L. Niewyk writes, “the contributions made by Christian antisemitism to the climate of opinion that made the genocide of the Jews possible in the European heartland of ostensibly Christian Western civilization.”

By way of illustration, reforming the church doctrine to end liturgy and teachings, which for centuries had created a powerful religious justification and incitement in the minds of millions of Catholics for prejudice against and persecution of their Jewish neighbors, did not come until Vatican II Council (1962-65) long after WWII. It finally declared that the “death of Christ cannot be charged against all the Jews then alive, without distinction, nor against the Jews of today.” It reasoned that “Christ died for our sins” and the crucifixion was salvation, it is human sin that is responsible for the crucifixion. Without sin there would be no need for sacrificial atonement. It continued saying “the Gospel’s spiritual love decries hatred, persecutions, displays of antisemitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone.” One could argue that this pronouncement was 2,000 years late, especially since the Church holds itself out as infallible.

It was disappointing, but not surprising that the Catholic Church and most Protestants not only turned a blind eye to Hitler’s gruesome crimes, but also had clergy who openly supported Hitler’s regime. The Vatican was the first sovereign to sign a treaty (Reichskonkordat) with the Nazis, which served to legitimize their rule in the eyes of other nations and of Catholics everywhere, just as Vatican approval and the Lateran Accords had done for Mussolini. It “ensured that Nazism could rise unopposed by the most powerful Catholic community in the world [Germany’s].” It also encouraged Hitler that he could act “against international Jewry.” So, keeping in line with a history of support of atrocities and/or unwillingness to speak out against crimes, the Pope remained silent during Hitler’s invasion of Poland in 1939. One would think the Pope would have at least revoked the treaty the Church had negotiated with Hitler in 1933, but he did not.

Cardinal Eugène Tisserant witnessed Pope Pius XII’s weak behavior up close in Rome at the time and then commented: “I fear that history will reproach the Holy See with having practiced a policy of selfish convenience and not much else!” And not only Catholic, but Protestant leaders seemed to support or turn a blind eye to what Hitler was doing in general. Christian leaders’ behavior during the Holocaust and Second World War, especially with Germany’s invasion of Poland: “exposed the emptiness of the churches in Germany, the cradle of the Reformation, and the cowardice and selfishness of the Holy See” according to Paul Johnson. Is it any wonder that Jews and other victims of the Nazis felt they had no allies in European Christians?

For more information on these topics, please see “The Rabbi Saved by Hitler’s Soldiers” https://www.amazon.com/.../070062.../ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hitler-church-where-god-bryan-mark-rigg

Respuesta  Mensaje 53 de 68 en el tema 
De: BARILOCHENSE6999 Enviado: 22/04/2025 04:11
Pope Francis died on April 21, 2025, the day after Easter, which coincided with Adolf Hitler's birthday and the alignment of Roman Catholic.
AXIS AXIS ADVANCES.  Adolf Hitler's Birthday  April 20, 1889  121 years  old. - ppt download


Primer  Anterior  39 a 53 de 68  Siguiente   Último 
Tema anterior  Tema siguiente
 
©2025 - Gabitos - Todos los derechos reservados