Home  |  Contact  



Sign Up Now!

Forgot your password?

What’s New
  Join Now
  Message Board 
  Image Gallery 
 Files and Documents 
 Polls and Test 
  Member List
GIZE, STONEHENGE, CHICHEN ITZA, ETC,ETC: The Keys of Atlantis-Vescica Piscis y el paralelo 30/Gran Piramide
Choose another message board
Previous subject  Next subject
Reply  Message 1 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999  (Original message) Sent: 02/12/2012 14:29

The Keys of Atlantis

A Study of Ancient Unified Numerical and Metrological Systems

by Peter Wakefield Sault

Copyright © Peter Wakefield Sault 1973-2012
All rights reserved worldwide


The Keys of Atlantis


Chapter 3.

Mountains of The Moon

The Stone-Cored Pyramids of Egypt


This little treatise is a mathematical, metrological, geographical and astronomical analysis of certain Egyptian pyramids. English translations of their ancient traditional names, less the names of the kings to whom rightly or wrongly a much later Egyptian priesthood attributed their building, are used here throughout except when quoting other authors. This is problematic since the original Great Pyramid is nowadays generally referred to as Khafre, Khephren or the Second Giza Pyramid. The original name of the pyramid now widely though erroneously known as the ‘Great Pyramid’ is Pyramid of The Horizon, or simply Horizon Pyramid. If, that is to say, ‘Horizon’ is the correct interpretation of the hieroglyph Akhet, about which some apparently justifiable doubt remains. In order to minimise the reader's possible confusion, the original and true Great Pyramid (i.e. ‘Khephren’) will here be referred to as the Grand Pyramid.



1.   The Giza Complex
2.   The Horizon Pyramid
3.   The Grand Pyramid
4.   The Divine Pyramid
5.   The Southern Shining Pyramid
6.   The Rising Sun Pyramid
7.   Theoretical Dimensions of The Stone-Cored Pyramids
8.   Earth And Moon
9.   The Western Cubit And Foot
10.   The Great Circle Way
11.   The Egyptological Fraud


1.   The Pyramids of Giza (1)
2.   Map of The Giza Pyramid Complex
3.   Theoretical Proportions of The Horizon Pyramid
4.   Stellated Pyramid
5.   Squaring The Circle ­­­­­­– Geometry of The Horizon Pyramid
6.   Theoretical Cross-Section of The Horizon Pyramid
7.   Theoretical Proportions of The Metrological Cavity of The Horizon Pyramid
8.   The Egyptian Stade
9.   Theoretical Cross-Section of The Grand Pyramid
10.   Theoretical Cross-Section of The Divine Pyramid
11.   Ratio between The Heights of Horizon and Divine Pyramids
12.   The Pyramids of Giza (2)
13.   The Southern Shining Pyramid
14.   Theoretical Slopes of The Southern Shining Pyramid
15.   Theoretical Slope of The Hidden Pyramid
16.   The Rising Sun Pyramid
17.   Theoretical Geometry of The Rising Sun Pyramid
18.   Volume Equivalent to The Rising Sun Pyramid
19.   Vesica Piscis And 30th Parallel
20.   Earth, Moon And Horizon Pyramid
21.   Earth, Moon And {3-4-5} Triangles
22.   Earth, Moon And Grand Pyramid
23.   The Seven Days of The World
24.   Abhisambodhi Vairocana Mandala
25.   The 30th Parallel
26.   The Dimensions of A Classical Guitar
27.   A 24-Inch Steel Rule
28.   Pyramids Road
29.   The Great Circle Way Discovered in Cairo
30.   The Great Circle Way from Atlantic to Pacific
31.   The Middle East in 1450 BC Traversed by The Great Circle Way


1.   Earth, Moon And Horizon Pyramid


1.   Theoretical Dimensions of The Metrological Cavity of the Horizon Pyramid
2.   Reported Measures of The Southern Shining Pyramid
3.   Reported Measures of The Rising Sun Pyramid
4.   Theoretical Volumes of The Stone-Cored Pyramids
5.   Identities of The 30th Parallel




3-1. The Giza Complex

Figure 3-1. The Pyramids of Giza (1)

Figure 3-2. Map of The Giza Pyramid Complex



3-2. The Horizon Pyramid

The Pyramid of The Horizon, known variously although erroneously as the Pyramid of Khufu, Pyramid of Kheops, Great Pyramid or First Giza Pyramid, stands on the Giza Plateau in Egypt at 29° 58' 45" N × 31° 08' 03" E. These and all other geographical coordinates given in this chapter have been obtained since 2006 with the aid of Google Earth and supercede all earlier figures from other sources.

Peter Tompkins summarizes the origin of the Horizon Pyramid thus[1]

“Though all agree that the Great [Horizon] Pyramid is at least four thousand years old, none can say for certain just when it was built, by whom, or why.”

The first thing to note about this observation is that Tompkins refrains from attempting to assign a maximum age to the Horizon Pyramid.

Tompkins' book ‘Secrets of The Great [Horizon] Pyramid’ (1971) is without doubt the most comprehensive compendium of myths, legends and knowledge about the Horizon Pyramid ever published and was, as noted on his website*, “not yet faulted in its original content”. Until now, that is to say, firstly in respect of his misapplication of the name ‘Great’ to the Horizon Pyramid and secondly in his treatment of Isaac Newton's fictive ‘Memphis Cubit’ as if it were a genuine unit of measure when it was never more than a figment of Newton's fevered imagination. These matters will be discussed in detail in the final section of this chapter, ‘The Egyptological Fraud’.

Tompkins goes on to say[2]

“It would be satisfactory to be able to describe the method by which the Great [Horizon] Pyramid was put together, by whom, and when.

“But the builders, whoever they may have been, left no description of their method. No one has even found a later Egyptian report of how the first pyramids were built.”

The earliest extant reference to the Horizon Pyramid comes from Herodotus, who says[7]

“To build the pyramid itself took twenty years; it is square at the base, its height (800 feet) equal to the length of each side; it is of polished stone blocks beautifully fitted, none of the blocks being less than thirty feet long.”

It would be another 2,000 years before the Horizon Pyramid was accurately surveyed and the relationship between its height and the length of each side thereby properly observed. With the missing part of the statement inserted:­­­­­­– The quadrant whose radius is the height is equal to the length of each side.

Figure 3-3. Theoretical Proportions of the Horizon Pyramid

Some of the earlier surveys contained errors and gave rise to some preposterous theories, none of which will be discussed here, about which Prof. W.M.F.Petrie says[8]

“It is useless to state the real truth of the matter, as it has no effect on those who are subject to this type of hallucination. They can but be left with the flat earth believers and other such people to whom a theory is dearer than a fact.”




First  Previous  2 to 16 of 61  Next   Last 
Reply  Message 2 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 14:30

The results of the two most reputable surveys of the Giza pyramids, those of W.M.F.Petrie (1881) and J.H.Cole (1925, Horizon Pyramid only), are shown in Appendix C. Since these surveys were conducted, certain peculiarities in the form of the Horizon Pyramid have come to light, not the least being a very slight indentation of the sides which results in the distance across the middle of the base (BC in Figure 3-3), between opposite apothems (AB and AC in Figure 3-3), being shorter than the lengths of the sides parallel to it, by about 1.2 metres. The indentations went unnoticed until discovered by aerial photography and are visible only when the Sun is shining across a face, throwing half of that face into shadow. Their presence testifies to the high degree of precision with which the Horizon Pyramid was built.

Figure 3-4. Stellated Pyramid

The first person to comment on the apparent p (pi) relationship between the height of the Pyramid and the perimeter of its base was John Taylor, working from measurements made by John Perring during Howard Vyse's expedition in the 1830s. Petrie later opined that it formed the basis of one of the best theories regarding the intended dimensions. Of the angle and elevation of the Horizon Pyramid, Petrie says[12]

“On the whole, we probably cannot do better than take 51° 52' ± 2' as the nearest approximation to the mean angle of the Pyramid, allowing some weight to the South side.
“The mean base being 9,068.8 ± 0.5 inches, this yields a height of 5,776.0 ± 7.0 inches.”

This gives a range of ratios of base-width to height, varying between (9068.8 - 0.5)/(5776.0 + 7.0) and (9068.8 + 0.5)/(5776.0 - 7.0), or 1.5681 and 1.5721, with a difference of 0.004, or roughly 0.25%. It can be seen that the values p/2 (~1.5708) and 11/7 (~1.5714) both fall within this range.

This means that, whatever the true or intended dimensions, the height is equal to the radius of a circle whose circumference very closely approximates the perimeter of the base.

Figure 3-5. Squaring The Circle ­­­­­– Geometry of The Horizon Pyramid

The attribution of the building of the Horizon Pyramid to Khufu was documented first by Herodotus, who took it as fact on the basis of assertions made by the priests of Sais.

The modern evidence is equally suspect; some red ochre paint daubed on a block of stone in one of the cavities above the metrological cavity, the so-called King's Chamber, allegedly showing the cartouche of Khufu. There were, however, rumours of paintbrushes and cans of red ochre paint, still used by Egyptian quarry workers nowadays to mark stones, being carried into the Horizon Pyramid during Howard Vyse's expedition coincident with Vyse's need to raise new funding. This he succeeded in doing following the announcement of his convenient ‘discovery’ that the Horizon Pyramid could indeed be attributed to Khufu and therefore confidently dated ­­­­­– happily for everyone ­­­­­– in accordance with both Egyptian kinglists and the Torah's dating of ‘Creation’.

Moreover, the ancient cemeteries and boat pits adjacent to the Horizon Pyramid seem unlikely to have belonged to the builders or original keepers of any part of the Giza complex since they encroach upon the Horizon Pyramid's precinct, as can be seen quite clearly in satellite images. Such travesties would simply never have been permitted by the builders since all they have ever done is to despoil and desecrate the complex, as can also be seen quite clearly in satellite images. The later pyramid cults to which the cemeteries bear witness appear to have had as much to do with the building of the Giza pyramids as latterday ersatz ‘druids’ have to do with that of Stonehenge. The remains of the precinct walls of the two other main Giza pyramids can also clearly be seen in satellite images.

* * *

The first person known to have looked for a linear modulus of the Horizon Pyramid in the dimensions of the metrological cavity was Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), working from measurements of it made separately by John Greaves (1638) and Tito Livio Burattini (1642). Through a particularly abstruse line of argument, Newton concluded that this modulus was equal to a tenth part of the width of the cavity. It was the dimensions of the Earth that Newton was looking for in order to confirm his theory of gravitation and he had acquired from an unknown source the belief that the builders had encoded these dimensions in those of the Horizon Pyramid. As Tompkins records[3]

“...it was from Greaves's data that Sir Isaac Newton deduced that the Great [Horizon] Pyramid had been built on the basis of two different cubits, one of which he called ‘profane’ and the other which called ‘sacred’. From Greaves's and Burattini's measurements of the King's Chamber, Newton computed that a cubit of 20.63 British inches produced a room with an even length of cubits: 20 x 10. This cubit Newton called the ‘profane’, or ‘Memphis’, cubit; whereas a longer, more arcane cubit appeared to measure about 25 British inches.

“This longer, or ‘sacred’, cubit Newton derived from the Jewish historian Josephus's description of the circumference of the pillars of the Temple at Jerusalem. Newton estimated this cubit to be between 24.80 and 25.02 English inches, but believed the figure could be refined through further measurements of the Great [Horizon] Pyramid and other ancient buildings.

“All of this Newton wrote up in a small and now hard-to-find paper called A Dissertation upon the Sacred Cubit of the Jews and the Cubits of several Nations; in which, as taken by Mr. John Greaves, the ancient Cubit of Memphis is determined.

“Newton's preoccupation with establishing the cubit of the ancient Egyptians was no idle curiosity, nor just a desire to find a universal standard of measure; his general theory of gravitation, which he had not yet announced, was dependent on an accurate knowledge of the circumference of the earth. All he had to go on were the old figures of Eratosthenes and his followers, and on their figures his theory did not work out accurately.

“By establishing the cubit of the ancient Egyptians, Newton hoped to find the exact length of their stadium, reputed by classical authors to bear a relation to a geographical degree, and this he believed to be somehow enshrined in the proportions of the Great [Horizon] Pyramid.”

Newton was working backwards from a purely hypothetical Israelite cubit allegedly described by a now largely discredited historian and of which no physical example existed, via the ratio 6:7 (that of a hypothetical ‘profane’, or ‘common’, cubit to a hypothetical ‘sacred’, or ‘royal’, cubit and a Diophantine approximation to √3:2, that being the exact ratio of the dimensions of 30th Parallel and Equator on a sphere), to a division by 10 of the width of the floor of the metrological cavity of the Horizon Pyramid thence to postulate a ‘Memphis’ cubit that had existed since the foundation of Egypt. Clearly this line of argument is far-fetched, to say the very least. Nonetheless, subsequent authorities bowed to that of Newton and, for example, Dr. Charles Piazzi Smyth lauded Newton thus:[4]

“How thankful should we be that it pleased God to raise up the spirit of Newton amongst us; and enable him to make one of the most important discoveries of his riper years ­­­­­– though the opposition of the Church of England has caused it to remain unread almost to the present day ­­­­­– that while there undoubtedly was in ancient times a cubit of 20.7 inches nearly... ...and which Newton calls ‘the profane cubit’ there was another which he equally unhesitatingly speaks of as the sacred cubit, decidedly longer.”

Petrie also accepted without question the use of Newton's Israelite cubit in the construction of the Horizon Pyramid [9]

“Thus the total length of the plug-blocks would be about 203 inches, or very probably 206 inches, or 10 [Newton's] cubits, like so many lengths marked out in that passage.”

And then Prof. Livio Stecchini adds his stamp of approval;[6]

“It was Newton who, on the basis of the survey conducted by Greaves, realized that the King's Chamber measures 10 by 20 [Newton's] cubits. Having established this fact,...”

Others, however, have noticed the insubstantial nature of Newton's cubit, Derek Gjertsen observing in respect of it that[14]

“As with many such works, both before and after, however tight the reasoning, the reliability of the conclusions will still depend upon the accuracy of the initial assumptions. As many of these were, in fact, no more than guesses, Newton's conclusions lose much of their initial plausibility.”

Despite its dubious pedigree many contemporary authors continue to treat Newton's cubit as if it was genuine.

The only clear facts are that the proportions of the floor of the metrological cavity are 1:2 and that the length is a whole-number division of both the width and the height of the pyramid, making these 22 and 14 cavity-lengths respectively. Hence, for the floor, the longest common linear extent is the width of the cavity, 206.3 ±0.2, English inches (5.24m). This is indeed close to Petrie's reported length of the plug-blocks, as noted above. The width of the cavity is to its height as 9:10 and taking this into account the longest common length that can be derived from all three of its dimensions is a unit equal to a tenth part of the height of the cavity, again unlike Newton's cubit, at ~22.9 English inches (~582mm). In terms of this linear modulus, or Horizon cubit, the width of the base and the height of the Horizon Pyramid come out at 396 and 252 respectively. The figure for the width of the base is remarkably close to that suggested by French scientist Edmé-François Jomard (1777-1862), 400 pyk belady, that being the number of cubits to a stade.[5]

“In vain Jomard argued that he had found an even more surprising coincidence in that the four-hundredth part of his base of the [Horizon] Pyramid gave a figure of .5773 meter, which was exactly the length of a longer modern Egyptian cubit called the pyk belady.”

Jomard's measure of the width of the base was, however, slightly excessive since 1/400th of the actual width is 0.5759 metre (22.67 inches), taking J.H.Cole's mean value of 230.364 metres, where 1/396th gives 0.5817 metre (22.9 inches). Moreover, the square stade is the area of the sacred precinct, not of the temple which stands within it. Hence the Horizon stade would be expected to exceed the width of the Horizon Pyramid. Four hundred Horizon cubits gives a stade of some 9,160 inches (232.66 metre). Curiously, 1/400th of Perring's erroneous figure for the width of the base, 764 English feet, is the pyk belady of 22.9 English inches.

Although the pyk belady was in use in Egypt in Jomard's time nothing is known of its origin and history therefore no firm conclusion can be reached about the age of the Horizon Pyramid from the fact that it is the modulus. All that can be said of the modulus is that it must of necessity predate any structure which incorporates it. The name ‘pyk belady’ combines the Egyptian word for a cubit, etymologically related to the Greek ΠΗΧΥΣ, pekhus and ΠΥΓΩΝ, pygon, both also meaning a cubit, with that for ‘our land’, as in the modern Egyptian national anthem ‘Belady, Belady, Belady’. Hence ‘pyk belady’ can be taken to mean ‘national cubit [of Egypt]’.

Figure 3-6. Theoretical Cross-Section of The Horizon Pyramid

It might be thought that metrological standards in ancient times followed the same principle as those of today and that, therefore, a given unit would have measured exactly the same absolute quantity no matter what the context. However, as was seen in the case of the Parthenon stade, the unit used for the temple, although approximating it, was not the same as that of the general tradesman. There seems to be no intentional conversion ratio between the two standards, which merely approximate one another, varying only by a few inches; varying nonetheless. It would appear that in the field of monumental architecture units were consistent only within the context of a particular undertaking and that an architectural guild was at liberty to contrive its own linear standards project by project within a fairly narrow range of lengths as long as they conformed to a uniform fixed system. The particular set of standards for each pyramid was created and ritually consecrated specifically for that pyramid then ritually desecrated and made useless once the building was complete. A remnant of this ritual destruction of the project standards can be seen in the modern ceremony of cutting the ribbon at the official opening of a new public building by some or other dignitary. The ribbon symbolises the primary standard, the stade rope, used in the construction.

The averaged, corrected measures of the metrological cavity are shown in Table 3-1. Petrie's words concerning the condition of the cavity as he found it must be borne in mind.[10]

“The King's Chamber was more completely measured than any other part of the Pyramid; the distances of the walls apart, their verticality in each corner, the course heights, and the levels, were completely observed. On every side the joints of the stones have separated, and the whole chamber is shaken larger. By examining the joints all round the 2nd course, the sum of the estimated openings is, 3 joints opened on N. side, total = .19 [English inches]; 1 joint on E. = .14; 5 joints on S. = .41; 2 joints on W. = .38. And these quantities must be deducted from the measures, in order to get the true original lengths of the chamber. I also observed, in measuring the top near the W., that the width from N. to S. is lengthened .3 by a crack at the S. side.

“These openings or cracks are but the milder signs of the great injury that that the whole chamber has sustained, probably by an earthquake, when every roof beam was broken across near the South side; and since which the whole of the granite ceiling (weighing some 400 tons), is upheld solely by sticking and thrusting. Not only has this wreck overtaken the chamber itself, but in every one of the spaces above it are the massive roof-beams either cracked or torn out of the wall, more or less, at the South side; and the great Eastern and Western walls of limestone, between, and independent of which, the whole of these construction chambers are built, have sunk bodily. All these motions are yet but small ­­­­­– only a matter of an inch or two ­­­­­– but enough to wreck the theoretical strength and stability of these chambers, and to make their downfall a mere question of time and earthquakes.”

“The floor of the chamber, as is well known, is quite disconnected from the walls, and stands somewhat above the base of the lowest course. It is very irregular in its level, not only absolutely, but even in relation to the courses; its depth below the first course joint varying 2.29 [English inches], from 42.94 to 40.65.”

This is an example of the marriage of certain irrational and mutually incommensurable numerical constants, such as π (pi) and 2 (square root of 2), using a system of whole numbers and their ratios. In order to do this, some rough-and-ready approximations must be incorporated. The primary approximation expressed by the gross form of the Horizon Pyramid is that of 6 2/7, or the perimeter of the base divided by the height, as a representation of the value 2π. Hence there can be no exact expression of any of the constants referenced in any of the physical approximations embodied in any of the structures. In fact, to find a single exact value anywhere would be to exclude all possibility of finding comparable references. The architect has created a compendium of equally variant Diophantine approximations.

Figure 3-7. Theoretical Proportions of The Metrological Cavity of The Horizon Pyramid

In terms of the proportion 9:10:18, employing the derived Horizon cubit of ~22.9 English inches:- The theoretical surface area of the metrological cavity is 864 square Horizon cubits. This is equal to the surface area of a cube of edge 12 Horizon cubits. The volumes of the cavity and its cube of equal surface area are in the ratio of a naturally tempered musical semitone, 15:16. This is also the ratio of both the widths of the bases (variance 0.34%) and the capacities of the coffers of the Grand and Horizon Pyramids. The sum of the lengths of all the edges of a 12-cubit cube is to that of the cavity as 36:37. The theoretical volume of the Horizon Pyramid is 13,172,544 cubic Horizon cubits.

13,172,544 = 26 × 35 × 71 × 112 = 7 × 332 × 123


Reply  Message 3 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 14:31
QuantityMeasure Width at ground level 188 metres (617 feet) Height overall 105 metres (345 feet) Upper dihedral angle 43° 22' Lower dihedral angle 54° 27' 44" Table 3-2. Reported Measures of The Southern Shining Pyramid [


As with the Horizon Pyramid, the linear modulus of the Southern Shining Pyramid is a 9th part of the width, 207.09 English inches, of its principal cavity, giving a Southern Shining cubit of 23.01 English inches. With this unit the height of the pyramid emerges as 180 cubits and the width of its base as 324 cubits. The rest follows accordingly as shown in Figure 3-14. A small adjustment to the reported dihedral angle of the upper faces is needed to bring the whole scheme into perfection.

Figure 3-14. Theoretical Slopes of The Southern Shining Pyramid






That is exactly equal to 7,623 12-cubit cubes; cubes, that is, of surface area equal to that of the theoretical metrological cavity. Now, these 7,623 cubes can be arranged as a stack of 7 equal square tiers of width 33. With the width of the tiers equal to the width of the base of the pyramid, the height of the resulting rectangular block is exactly 1/3rd of the height of the pyramid. Altogether, the figure clearly embodies in whole numbers the arithmetical method for calculating the volume of any pyramid; one third of the height times the area of the base.

Hence it may be concluded that the Horizon Pyramid was laid out and constructed using the pyk belady as its modulus. However, because nothing is known about the history of this unit of measure beyond its use in the construction of the Horizon Pyramid and its general use in Egypt at the time of Jomard's visit, its age and origin cannot be established and, therefore, no firm conclusion can be drawn about the age of the Horizon Pyramid from its use. Jomard's observation is seemingly the only connection to any memory of its existence, since all other mentions of this unit themselves refer back to him as their source. Nonetheless it is clear that the linear modulus of the Horizon Pyramid possesses a unique name and is no mere hypothesis. Not only that but the Horizon Pyramid linear modulus can confidently be labelled the Egyptian cubit, for that indeed is what it is.

Figure 3-8. The Egyptian Stade

Taking the disk of the Earth as a circle and the value of pi as 22/7, in Egyptian stades of 400 cubits the circumference so obtained is exactly 171,072 Egyptian stades and the radius 27,216. A Greek stade on the same circle would be exactly equal to 99/125 Egyptian stade (terrestrial circumference = 216,000 Greek stades).

The Horizon Pyramid width, at 99/100 Egyptian stades, is equally interesting since the terrestrial circumference comes out at 172,800 or 100 times the cube of 12. Moreover, again on the same circle, it is exactly equal to 1¼ Greek stades, the Greek metric standards having been supplied to Solon by the Temple of Neith at Sais around 600 BC, suggesting an unbroken tradition stretching from the building of the Giza complex to that of the Parthenon of Athens. The Greek system of linear measures was derived from the Egyptian and both include a digit (finger) as the smallest unit, a foot of 16 digits, a cubit of 24 digits and a stade of 600 feet.

* Peter Tompkins' website was removed from the World-Wide Web in February 2008, a year after his death in January 2007. This author has a copy saved in his archives.



3-3. The Grand Pyramid

The mean width of the base of the Grand Pyramid is almost exactly 370 Horizon cubits (pyk belady), the variance being roughly 1 part in 6,000 or 0.016%, and here the rounded figure will be assumed to be the intended width. This pyramid was apparently intended to conform to the proportions of a Pythagorean {3-4-5} triangle, giving a theoretical height of 246⅔ cubits or 370 feet.

Figure 3-9. Theoretical Cross-Section of The Grand Pyramid

The theoretical volume of the Grand Pyramid is exactly 37,989,750 cubic Horizon feet.

37,989,750 = 2 × 3 × 53 × 373 = 6 × 1853

The length of each edge of the 6 cubes so defined is equal to half the height of, and to one third the width of, the pyramid.



3-4. The Divine Pyramid

Petrie's mean for the width of the Divine Pyramid is 4,153.6 English inches, or roughly 181.34 Horizon cubits with a probable intended figure of 181⅓ cubits, or 272 Horizon feet exactly, differing from the mean by ­­­­­–0.004%. For the angle of the apothem Petrie's “best conclusion” is 51°0' ± 10'. This results in a height somewhere between 2549 and 2580 English inches, or roughly 167 and 169 Horizon feet. Taking the mean gives a height of 168 feet and this will be found to share a common factor of 8 with the theoretical width. Hence the proportions are 21 rise on 17 base, revealing a clearly intended allusion in the division of the width by the height to Φ (Phi), the Golden Mean or Divine Proportion, differing from it by a mere +0.06%. In fact the ratio of height into width, 21:34, displayed by the Divine Pyramid is the 8th term of the Fibonacci Sequence, which converges to Phi.[18]

Figure 3-10. Theoretical Cross-Section of The Divine Pyramid

The theoretical volume of the Divine Pyramid is exactly 4,143,104 cubic Horizon feet.

4,143,104 = 7 × 342 × 83

* * *

Figure 3-11. The Ratio between The Heights of Horizon And Divine Pyramids

The ratio between the heights of Horizon and Divine pyramids is the same as that between the length and breadth respectively of the platform of the Parthenon of Athens - 4:9. This ratio belongs to the Lambda, itself the root and source of the dodekaphonic musical scale, as described in Chapter 1, suggesting that the Giza complex comprises an integrated design and that its overall planning was completed before a single stone was quarried for a single pyramid.

Figure 3-12. The Pyramids of Giza (2)



3-5. The Southern Shining Pyramid

Figure 3-13. The Southern Shining Pyramid

The reader can forget the Egyptological dogma that seeks to explain the compound slope of the Southern Shining Pyramid as a decision by the builders to switch slopes in mid-project, the rationalization of this usually being that they discovered that the internal stresses of the structure prevented completion of a pyramid with the continued slope of the lower section. How exactly they discovered this is never made clear and no evidence supporting the stress-factor hypothesis is ever presented. It is of course a flight of fancy, for from the outset the Southern Shining Pyramid was designed to be a flattened obelisk, as the following analysis of its geometry will make very clear.


Reply  Message 4 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 14:33
QuantityMeasure Width 220 metres (722 feet) Height 105 metres (345 feet) Dihedral angle 43° 22' Table 3-3. Reported Measures of The Rising Sun Pyramid [


The form of the Rising Sun Pyramid is defined by a circle and an equilateral triangle:-

  • The perimeter of the equilateral triangle is equal to the circumference of the circle (π = 22/7).
  • The height of the pyramid is equal to the radius of the circle.
  • The width of the pyramid is equal to one side of the equilateral triangle.

Figure 3-17. Theoretical Geometry of The Rising Sun Pyramid




The theoretical volume of the Southern Shining Pyramid is exactly 7,286,976 cubic Southern Shining cubits.

7,286,976 = 123 × 4217

The outer form contains an implied inner, or hidden, pyramid.

Figure 3-15. Theoretical Slope of The Hidden Pyramid

The theoretical volume of the Hidden Pyramid is exactly 6,298,560 cubic Southern Shining cubits.

6,298,560 = 123 × 93 × 5 = 5 × 1083

The length of each edge of the 5 cubes so defined is equal to three fifths (0.6) the height of, and to one third the width of, the Hidden Pyramid.



3-6. The Rising Sun Pyramid

Figure 3-16. The Rising Sun Pyramid

The Rising Sun Pyramid, also known as the Red Pyramid because of the colour of its exposed rocky core, is located in the Dahshur pyramid field at 29° 48' 30.9" N × 31° 12' 22" E. This is a large pyramid with a rock core and, like every pyramid and mastaba, has been stripped of its limestone casing by stone robbers, leading directly to the complete and utter collapses of those many pyramids which had been built with mud brick cores. However, with the cores exposed aerial photography and now satellite imaging reveal that those of both the Horizon Pyramid and the Rising Sun Pyramid are stellated, something that would have remained undetectable and completely unknown had they retained their unstellated casings. This means only that both pyramids are unquestionably products of the same guild of architects, assuming that no single architect working in isolation could have raised all the stone-cored pyramids given both the magnitude of each project individually and the number of other pyramids with similarly stellated stone cores.


Reply  Message 5 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 14:35

It should be noted that the recovery here of the ancient Egyptian stade has been made possible only very recently by the emergences of the Global Positioning System and Google Earth (see Appendix C). In other words, with data from artificial satellites and radio telemetry. The question of how the builders could position the Horizon Pyramid so very precisely without such aids belongs with that other great mystery ­­­­­– how the Horizon Pyramid was built.

The significance of the 30th Parallel in the scheme of things is that it can be geometrically constructed in cross-section, with compasses and straightedge, via a vesica piscis. The three-dimensional analog of the vesica is formed by the overlapping of two equal spheres such that the centre of one lies on the surface of the other, with the 30th Parallel occurring along the intersection of the surfaces.

Figure 3-19. Vesica Piscis And 30th Parallel

From here on the latitudes of the apex of the Horizon Pyramid, of the radius of exactly 3⅔ Lunar radii and of the most northerly overhead Moon will be treated as identities of the 30th Parallel. Furthermore, Moon and Earth will be treated as reference spheres whose radii are in the ratio 3:11. And π will be evaluated at 22/7, for by doing all of these things a series of remarkable coincidences will be encountered.

Figure 3-20. Earth, Moon And Horizon Pyramid

Reply  Message 6 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 14:36

When the disk of the Moon is also enclosed in a square, the first such coincidence is the appearance of Pythagorean {3-4-5} triangles in the geometrical construction resulting from its juxtaposition with the disk of the Earth.

Figure 3-21. Earth, Moon And {3-4-5} Triangles

Extending the construction to form a cross-section of the Grand Pyramid, the lengths of the component lines must be multiplied up, in this case by 12 (the sum of 3, 4 and 5), in order to continue expressing them all as whole numbers. This gives a unit exactly equal to 60 English miles, 60 being the product of 3, 4 and 5. Put another way, if the modulus of the diagram shown in Figure 3-22, equal to 1/132nd of the diameter of the Terrestrial reference sphere, the Grand span, is subdivided by the product of 3, 4 and 5 then the result is a unit of length which is exactly equal to a modern English or U.S. mile.

Figure 3-22. Earth, Moon And Grand Pyramid

In terms of the Grand span derived in Figure 3-22, the combined diameters of the Terrestrial and Lunar reference spheres is 168. That is also the number of hours in each and every week. Just as the Grand span is exactly divisible into 60 English miles, so the hour is divided into 60 minutes and the number of minutes in every seven-day period is exactly 10,080. Seven days is very roughly the period of a single Lunar quarter.

Figure 3-23. The Seven Days of The World

The radius of the large circle whose circumference is equal to the perimeter of the square around the Earth, taking π (pi) to be 22/7, is 5,040 miles. 5,040 is the product of all the numbers from 1 to 7, written 7! and is known as the factorial of seven.

5,040 = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 × 7 = 7!

The modulus of the diagram shown in Figure 3-21 is 720 miles. 720 is the factorial of six.

720 = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 = 6!

The circumference of the large circle, again taking π = 22/7, is exactly 528 Grand spans, or 31,680 miles, and this is of course equal in length to the perimeter of the square around the Earth, the base of the virtual cosmic Horizon Pyramid whose height is equal to the combined radii of Earth and Moon, or 5,040 miles.

Figure 3-24. Abhisambodhi Vairocana Mandala (Tibet, 14th Century)

Reply  Message 7 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 02/12/2012 14:37

The story of the Grand span does not end there but provides yet another identity of the 30th Parallel. At latitude 29°45'30" N, some 16½ miles south of the Horizon Pyramid, the circumference of the parallel is exactly 360 Grand spans. This means that the Grand span is the length of a degree and the mile the length of a minute of arc along that parallel.

Figure 3-25. The 30th Parallel



3-9. The Western Cubit And Foot

Before the introduction of the Napoleonic system, in one form or another Long Measure was in widespread use throughout Western Europe . Evidence for this lies in the Spanish, or classical, guitar which will be found always to have a 24-inch action, as shown in Figure 3-26.

Figure 3-26. The Dimensions of A Classical Guitar

Twenty four inches or digits comprise a common cubit, the particular length here (609.6mm) being the Western European standard, as distinct from Greek, Egyptian or other standardized cubits. The English system includes a great cubit, the yard, equal to 1½ common cubits, from which the inch is derived*. The English statutory foot, however, appears to be defective or aberrant since it breaks the general rule that makes the common cubit the harmonic mean of it (the foot) and the great cubit. The foot is that unit in the cubit sequence which cannot be divided in three equal parts each a whole number of digits and which thereby naturally terminates the sequence. Hence a proper Western foot would have to be 16 inches (406.4mm) long, just as Greek and Egyptian feet each comprise sixteen of their respective digits.

There are exactly 3,960 such Western feet in a mile, thus the Western foot divides the mile in exactly the same number as the mile divides that radius of the Earth, at 29°26'45" N, which is in an exact ratio of 11:3 with the radius of the Moon.

Figure 3-27. A 24-Inch Steel Rule (Rabone Chesterman, England, 1970)

* The Statutum de Admensuratione Terrae (1305) states [13]:-




3-10. The Great Circle Way

Figure 3-28. Pyramids Road (Map: Google)

Al-Ahram, Pyramids Road, is a broad thoroughfare that runs in a straight line WSW from the Nile, terminating in the desert about five hundred yards north of the Horizon Pyramid. It is very ancient, possibly even more so than the pyramids themselves. It seems as if the city of Cairo itself has sprung up around this very road.

Figure 3-29. The Great Circle Way Discovered in Cairo (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)

The azimuth of Pyramids Road at Cairo is 66.666°, making it a segment of a great circle whose northern vertex lies on the High Pass through the Himalayas in the vicinity of Kashmir at coordinates 37° 18' N × 71° 54' E. This same great circle is the shortest uninterrupted land route from the Atlantic coast of Africa, Liberia to be precise, to the Pacific coast of China. Curiously, the point at which it meets the Atlantic is also the eastern end of the shortest route across the Atlantic.

Figure 3-30. The Great Circle Way from Atlantic to Pacific (Satellite imagery: Google Earth)


Figure 3-31. The Middle East in 1450 BC Traversed by The Great Circle Way



3-11. The Egyptological Fraud

In 1654 James Usher, Archbishop of Armagh, announced that the Earth was ‘created’ in 4004 BC. This he did ­­­­­– without a trace of irony ­­­­­– on the basis of a patently absurd Judaic myth. A contemporary of Isaac Newton, John Lightfoot, Vice-chancellor of the University of Cambridge went so far as to narrow it down to 9 o'clock a.m. on the 23rd October of the same year[15]. Moreover, even this year, which must have seemed almost unimaginably ancient to Usher and Lightfoot, was obtained by downright fraud ­­­­­– the presentation of ages measured in months as if they were in solar years. The fraud was neither's but was instead that of the authors of the Judaic mythology, which may not even be a genuine mythology at all but one concocted for political purposes. For example, the age to which Noah is alleged to have lived was 950 solar years and these years are factored into the date of ‘Creation’ given above. It is quite obvious that the lifespan of Noah was not 950 solar years but the same number of months and using a nominal conversion rate of 13 months per solar year this translates to 73 solar years. Clearly Noah was an ordinary man, alleged extraordinary feats notwithstanding. In correcting this lifespan alone, the date of ‘Creation’ is brought forward by 877 years. However, Noah was not the only ancient Hebrew credited with an over-extended lifespan. If the age of Adam (930 months = 71½ years) and the period from Adam's death to the birth of Noah (216 months = 16½ years) are similarly corrected, then the date of ‘Creation’ must be brought forward by 1,935 years. Applying similar corrections to all the “generations of Adam”, the year of ‘Creation’ turns out to have been around 2000 BC at the earliest. If the dubious attribution of the Horizon Pyramid to King Khufu and the even more dubious dating of his reign to around 2600 BC are accepted then the pyramid must have been completed some six hundred years before ‘Creation’.

Nonetheless, despite the utter improbability of its claims and the complete lack of any supporting or corroborating evidence of a Hebrew or ‘Israelite’ presence there, Jean-François Champollion, the so-called ‘Father of Egyptology’, based his kinglist of Ancient Egypt upon the books of the Torah. As Peter Tompkins puts it:[19]

“By the time he was seventeen, Champollion had made his first table of the succession of Egyptian pharaohs, based on data culled from the Old Testament.”

Tompkins displays an interesting turn of phrase. When he states that Champollion “based” his kinglist on the so-called “Old Testament”, what he is actually saying (whether he knew it or not) is that Champollion fabricated a kinglist to conform to the Torah. This means that the entire history of the peoples of the Nile Valley as presented to the world by ‘Egyptologists’ cannot be trusted and is, therefore, worthless. Moreover it means that even if a King Khufu was indeed the commissioner of the Horizon Pyramid, as asserted to Herodotus by the Saite priesthood around 440 BC, the dating of his reign is based upon false evidence. All of the evidence that might have revealed some of the true history has been subject to systematic removal or destruction by subsequent generations of ‘Egyptologists’ with the singular purpose of continued funding from those with a vested interest in the perpetuation of fabricated histories, in particular that of the Torah. Academia is being selective when it chooses to believe what a priesthood had to say to Herodotus about the commissioner of the Horizon Pyramid and yet to disbelieve that same priesthood when, in around 600 BC, it informed Solon that an entire civilization had disappeared from the face of the Earth some 9,000 years before their time.

Champollion, like Newton before him, was a Freemason and likewise immersed in the masonic machinations of his time.

To be continued


Mountains of The Moon


1.   Peter Tompkins, Secrets of The Great [Horizon] Pyramid, 1971, p.xiii
2.   ibid. p.217
3.   ibid. pp.30-31
4.   ibid. p.77 (footnote)
5.   ibid. p.47
6.   Livio Catullo Stecchini, Notes On The Relation Of Ancient Measures To The Great [Horizon] Pyramid, included as an appendix to Secrets of The Great [Horizon] Pyramid, 1971, p.323
7.   Herodotus, The Histories, circa 440 B.C.
8.   W.M.F.Petrie, Seventy Years in Archaeology
9.   W.M.F.Petrie, The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh, 1883, p.88
10.   ibid. p.27
11.   ibid. p.28
12.   ibid. p.13
13.   A.E.Berriman, Historical Metrology, 1953, p.170
14.   Derek Gjertsen, The Newton Handbook, 1986, p.6
15.   ibid. p.7
16.   Mark Lehner, The Complete Pyramids, 1997, p.102
17.   ibid. p.104
18.   H.E.Huntley, The Divine Proportion, 1970, p.47
19.   Peter Tompkins, The Magic of Obelisks, 1981, p.160



The Keys of Atlantis










“And be it remembered that the Iron Yard of our Lord the King containeth three feet and no more. And a foot ought to contain 12 inches, by the right measure of this yard measured; to wit the thirty-sixth part of this yard rightly measured maketh an inch neither more nor less.”

Reply  Message 8 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 10/01/2013 15:06

Al igual que vimos el pasado día con el arquitecto español, dan un repaso a los increibles conocimientos matemáticos que tenían los constructores originales de las pirámides…

24-05-12 La Vanguardia entrevista al arquitecto español Miquel Pérez-Sánchez: "La pirámide de Keops conmemora el diluvio universal"…Avanzadísimas matemáticas se esconden en las medidas de la pirámide!!

También nos explican porque los constructores de las pirámides eligieron una medida tan aparentemente irregular que era el "codo"… 0,5235 metros…

Y el porque utilizaron esa extraña medida es tan sencillo, cómo dividir el diámetro de una circunferencia de 1 metro, pi entre 6…3,1416 / 6 = 0,5236…

O también…

Y todo medido en METROS!!!

Y la altura?? Sencillo, basandonos en geometría…

Pero no nos olvidemos que la altura de la pirámide es de 147 metros…

y la distancia al Sol en el perihelio es poco más de 147 millones de kilómetros

Es decir, calcularon la base para que la altura fuera esa…y cómo sabían la distancia que había al sol en sistema métrico??

Pero que dicen los matemáticos sobre la probabilidad de que fuese todo una casualidad ?…de que no conociesen ni el metro ni Pi, ni Phi?…PRACTICAMENTE NULA!!!!

ESTO ES CIENCIA, y durante años hemos sido catalogados como pseudocientíficos…Manda narices!

Y otro tema que ya alguno se estará preguntando…cómo conocían el metro si está basado en una medición de la CIRCUNFERENCIA DE LA TIERRA????????


METRO = la diezmillonésima parte de la distancia que separa el polo de la línea del ecuador terrestre

y esto fue definido oficialmente por primera vez en 1791..

je je…Cómo????

Que sabían que la TIERRA ERA REDONDA??? y no sólo eso, sino que conocían sus medidas????

Je je…me lo estoy pasando BOMBA!!!!

Conocimientos que  han pasado desapercibidos para la GRAN MAYORÍA, salvo para la MASONERÍA…sociedades secretas…cuyos integrantes construían templos, catedrales, etc, y ya utilizaban también con anterioridad a 1793 la medida del metro……cuando en esas épocas la gran pirámide estaba todavía enterrada en la arena…de nuevo..jeje!

Y sentaos que con lo siguiente os podéis caer de espaldas!!!

Y aquí no acaba la cosa…

Reply  Message 9 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 11/01/2013 02:55



The story of Atlantis is generally credited to Plato, even though he ascribed the story to much earlier Egyptian sources. According to those sources, the ancient, advanced Atlanteans ruled over islands and continents from an island kingdom outside of the Pillars of Hercules, which is thought to be the Straights of Gibralter. In Greek mythology, Atlas was the first king of Atlantis. Atlas had seven daughters known as the Atlantides. Because their mother was named Hesperis, they were also known as the Hesperides.

Machupicchu and the Great Pyramid are equally distant from the Cape Verde Islands. Easter Island and the Indus Valley are also equally distant from Cape Verde. When the Cape Verde Islands were rediscovered by European mariners in 1460 they were found to be uninhabited. However, islands in this location are found on earlier maps and described as inhabited in ancient times.

The Mecia de Viladestes map of 1413 shows islands in the location of Cape Verde labeled Gades. The information in this map is thought to have come from Roman sources dating back to the first century AD.

The discoveries of the world from their first originall unto the yeere of our Lord 1555, written by Antonio Galvao in 1563, lists the ancient names for the Cape Verde Islands as the Dorcades, Hesperides and the Gorgades. A 1587 map by Richard Hakluyt also labels the Cape Verde Islands as the Gorgades and the Hesperides.

According to Plato, there was a mountainous region north of the city of Atlantis. One possible location for Atlantis is in the Atlantic Ocean, just south of the Cape Verde Islands.

Arysio Nunes dos Santos proposed that Atlantis was originally located in the Bay of Bengal, just south of the mouth of the Ganges, and in the South China Sea. These areas were above sea level during the earth's last glaciation. The landmass that forms the shallow bottom of the South China Sea is the only known area on earth, large enough to meet Plato's description of the size of Atlantis, that sank at the end of the last ice age. Santos argues that scientific evidence, and references in ancient writings, folklore and myths, prove that the South China Sea and the Bay of Bengal were the original sites of Atlantis and Lemuria. Santos contends that a super eruption of Krakatoa in Atlantean times destroyed Atlantis and caused the end of the last ice age by covering the earth with volcanic ash which absorbed sunlight and melted the ice. The alignment of world wonders crosses over the Bay of Bengal, just south of the mouth of the Ganges, and goes right across the middle of the South China Sea. The halfway point betwen Mohenjo-Daro and Angkor is also located in the Bay of Bengal.

Another possible Atlantis location is halfway between the Great Pyramid and Easter Island, at 4° 19' north latitude, 41° 30' west longitude, under the Atlantic Ocean northeast of the mouth of the Amazon. On the diagram below, the marked locations are Giza, Angkor, Anatom Island, Easter Island, and 4° 19' north latitude, 41° 30' west longitude in the Atlantic Ocean. The distance from the Great Pyramid to Easter Island is approximately 40% of the circumference of the earth. The marked location in the Atlantic is halfway between the two, 20% each way. Machupicchu is halfway between Easter Island and the marked location in the Atlantic, 10% each way. The Distance from the Great Pyramid to Angkor Wat is approximately 20% of the circumference, and the Indus Valley is halfway between the two, 10% each way. The Distance from Easter Island to Angkor Wat is approximately 40% of the circumference, and Anatom Island is halfway between them, 20% each way. Although there are no islands in the Atlantic near 4° 19' north latitude, 41° 30' west longitude, it is interesting to note that the famous Piri Reis map shows a large island in this location, and the geology of recent core samples, taken from the ocean floor in this area, is of continental rather than oceanic type rock.

Reply  Message 10 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 11/01/2013 03:00


The old urban centers on the Eastern Seaboard of the U.S are in nearly perfect alignment. The image below is a cropped 3D projection centered on New York City.

Map image © VectorGlobe

This great circle line crosses through the middle of Washington DC and the middle of Boston, and it crosses right over the middle of New York City. It also crosses over Philadelphia and the Baltimore waterfront. The azimuth of this line as it crosses over NYC is 52°, which is also the angle of the sides of the Great Pyramid. The image below is an equal azimuthal projection, also centered on New York City, with this same alignment extended in both directions.

Map image - Roger Hedin

The alignment crosses between Teotihuacan and Cholula in Mexico and just as this alignment crosses into Mexico from the gulf it crosses over the ancient city of El Tajin and the pyramid of niches. The alignment also crosses over Baalbek, Lebanon and just north of the ancient city of Troy. The alignment also crosses over Stonehenge. The azimuth of the alignment as it crosses over Stonehenge is 72° west of due north and 72° east of due south, which is not the same as the primary alignment of Stonehenge itself. However, the alignment from the center of Stonehenge to the center of the heel stone is 52° east of due north, which is the same as the azimuth of this global alignment as it crosses over New York City and the same as the angle of the Great Pyramid.

Image - UNC Anthropology

Because the equilateral azimuthal projection below is centered on the maximum latitude of the alignment at 53° 33' N, 23° 35' W, the alignment is horizontal on the image. This is the same alignment that is shown on the two maps above. In addition to the cities on the Eastern Seaboard and the ancient sites listed above, this alignment also crosses over a number of other major cities of the modern era, including Mexico City, the national capital of Mexico; Mobile, Alabama; Atlanta, Georgia; London, the national capital of England; Lille, France, Stuttgart and Munich in southern Germany; Zagreb, the national capital of Croatia; Belgrade, the national capital of Serbia; Sofia, the national capital of Bulgaria; Beirut, the national capital of Lebanon; Damascus, the national capital of Syria; and Riyadh, the national capital of Saudi Arabia.

Map image - Roger Hedin


Reply  Message 11 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 05/02/2013 02:05
Fecha de Ingreso: 22-febrero-2012
Mensajes: 852
Gracias: 460
1.718 Agradecimientos de 663 mensajes
Ignorar usuario para siempre
Whitney Houston ¿nueva víctima de los illuminati?

Estamos tras la puerta del universo como bien decia Tesla, sobre el 3, 6, y el 9, hay que construir un conocimiento en base a estos conceptos, una buena forma y los Masones lo saben es a través de la geometria.


Toro (geometría)

Para otros usos de este término, véase Toro.

En geometría, un toro es una superficie de revolución generada por una circunferencia que gira alrededor de una recta exterior coplanaria (en su plano y que no la corta). La palabra «toro» proviene del vocablo en latín torus, el cual en castellano significa «bocel» o «murecillo», que es una moldura redondeada de la basa, con forma de hogaza de pan.1 2

Si hacemos un corte longitudonal de Toro obtenemos la Vesica Piscis, como siempre los nombres no son elegidos por que si, Benicio del Toro, etc.

Click para ampliar

Animación mostrando un toro siendo cortado por un plano, creando Círculos de Villarceau. Ver Vesica Piscis.

Juan 6.33

Porque el pan de Dios es el que baja del cielo, y da vida al mundo.

Click para ampliar

En cuanto a los cubos de los hipercubos, al juntarse el 9 y el 6 claramente chocan los ejes de los hipercubos, esto en definitiva es lo que produce el fuego y energia para el nuevo ciclo, puedes apreciar como en la forma octogonal el 6 y el 9 rotan sin problemas formando la estrella de 8 puntas, en el octogono mantienen la maxima distancia durante el ciclo, la llamada era dorada que viene despues del cataclismo, codigo de las manzanas doradas en el jardin de las hermanas Hesperides.

Estrella binaria - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre

Sistema binario girando reciprocamente en espiral, se puede apreciar de donde sale la forma geometrica del 6 y el 9, al colapsar los espirales esto números se juntan dando lugar a una nuevo ciclo de tiempo.

La nebulosa del ojo del gato es un sistema trinario parecido pero con una estrella en el medio, se puede apreciar que dentro de la vesica piscis hay una estrella, otras 2 la orbitan, de allí parte la singularidad, el codigo Mon de la Moon en Ingles Luna, codigo Da Vincia de la Mona Lisa, etc.
De alli como fractales nuestros siete dias, que son las siete vidas del gato, etc.

Click para ampliar

Construccion el heptragrama

Click para ampliar

Click para ampliar

En celeste tenemos enl heptagrama el cual coincide con el angulo de la gran piramide 360/7 =51.42
Podemos ver como la base el heptagrama es la gran piramide de Egipto, estos son los fractales del centro de la galaxia que producen nuestros siete dias, 28 dias del mes lunar, etc.
Por lo tanto la gran piramide representa la singularidad geometrica, las bases representas los ciclos Alfa y Omega, cuando cambie nuestro espiral 6 a 9 y se inviertan la rotacion de los cubos, la precesion de los equinoccios llegara hasta la puerta de Leo, mas 90 grados llegamos a Omega, el mismo proceso a la inversa.
Recordemos Omega - Libra - Lyra - las monedas de los imperios - Dios Apolo y su instrumento.

Última edición por IndigoMerovingio; 08-abr-2012 a las 17:18

Reply  Message 12 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 13/02/2013 19:18
Grandísimo Gurú burbujista
Fecha de Ingreso: 07-abril-2008
Ubicación: Cerca de mi casa
Mensajes: 3.546
Gracias: 6.979
3.252 Agradecimientos de 1.503 mensajes
Ignorar usuario para siempre
Interesante hipótesis si Gizah además de ser un reloj que marca el paso entre eras, señala además alineaciones referidas al mito de una inundación global

Click para ampliar

The specific placement of the Giza complex on the 30th parallel has long led people to suspect that it was constructed at that location according to deliberate geodetic placement. Piazzi Smyth suggested that the Giza complex identified an ancient 'meridian' as long ago as 1864. The latitude of Giza at 30° N, has been shown to have a geometric relationship with other sacred Egyptian complexes (see above), which in itself is suggestive of a deliberate geometric system of placement.

However, the latitude of 30° has its own geometric significance, representing 1/3rd of the way from equator to pole and a 1/12th division of the circumference of a circle. This division can be seen in both the measure of time and space (there are 12 solar months in the year, 24 hours in each day, and 12 astrological signs in the heavens).


The Great Pyramid of Giza is also a 43,200 scale representation of the outline of the northern hemisphere of the earth (Right).


The alignment of sites from Giza (Heliopolis) is not restricted to the 30th parallel as geometric alignments have been shown to extend from both Giza (Heliopolis) and Karnak (Thebes), to other sacred sites beyond Egypt. The example already demonstrated above between Giza and Baalbek, is in fact only a part of a larger alignment which extends for almost exactly 1000 miles directly towards Mount Ararat (as first observed by Livvio Stecchini).

While these long distance alignments are notoriously difficult to trace, the Giza (Heliopolis) - Baalbek (Heliopolis) section of the alignment is reinforced by supporting evidence; Namely, both sites were equinoctial, they both show the same incredibly skilled masonry techniques, and they are separated by almost exact degrees of longitude and latitude, Baalbek being located 4° North and 5° East.

The extreme length of this alignment would normally preclude it from investigation, but in this case, there is supporting evidence which makes it worth a closer look. Stecchini has already made a strong case for the connections between oracle centres and Egypt, with Karnak (Thebes) being the oracular centre and 'earth-navel' of ancient Egypt, as testified by the 'Omphalos' discovered at Karnak.

It is significant then that Dodona in Greece is both named as the oldest oracle centre in Greece (with a connection to Thebes supported by Herodotus), as the landing place for Deucalion following the 'Flood of Deucalion' in Greek mythology, while Ararat is clearly named as the landing place for the Ark in the Old Testament, as they both share the same latitude...and are located equidistant from Thebes.

Prehistoric Egyptian Geodesy.

Dodona in Greece is also aligned with Delphi and Behdet (the prehistoric capital of Egypt according to Stecchini) in what he called the 'Oracle Octave'.

Significantly, Stecchini stated that the pre-dynastic capital of Egypt, Behdet 'existed before 3,200 BC', and was replaced by the city Canopus, (The same name as the star that represents the 'rudder' of the constellation Argo). He suggested that this was the key to the connection between the two mythological narratives of the ‘Ark’ of the Hebrews and the ‘Argo’ of the Argonauts, which he believed, revealed evidence of a prehistoric system which included an understanding of astronomy and geometry (in the sense earthly measurements).

An alignment is commonly said to run from Giza to the Boyne-Valley, Ireland. Although the accuracy of this alignment is debateable, it nevertheless passes several of the most important places in Europe, both past and present: From Giza it runs north-west towards Rome (Vatican city), Zurich, Paris (Par-Isis), the Salisbury complex and on to the Boyne Valley.

Pateo.nl : Wholly Science

Reply  Message 13 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 15/02/2013 02:45
El 21 de Diciembre coincide con el codigo de Jesus, su muerte y resurreccion 3 dias despues, el dia 24 o Navidad.
Sabemos que los Mayas conocian los codigos y sus calendarios eran muy exactos, si conocía la fecha con exactitud es un misterio.
Lo que he expuesto como mayor prueba de que estamos cerca de este acontecimiento es el componente magnetico del hipercubo a 60 grados, lo cual fue confirmado por el Voyager fuera del sistema solar, en realidad deberia ser inferior a 60, 59,9.. o simil ya que la forma hexagonal del hipercubo es incompatible con el fluido del tiempo, los cubos se fusionan al chocar el 9 y el 6, de 16 puntos de la matriz pasamos a 15, numero impar por lo tanto se pierde polaridad.
Por que 33, el misterioso numero? Simplemente por que 4/3 = 8/6 =1.33, 8 el octogono del orden conformado por 2 cubos sobre el hexagono como el caos.
El punto medio entre ambos simboliza el pasaje entre la muerte y la resurreccion, los 3 dias de noche, el sol negro, etc.

Click para ampliar

Click para ampliar

El corte grafico 8/6 desde un extremo la singularidad del octogono en el centro de la galaxia a 33 grados y la componente medio de Virgo/Virgen a medio Piscis/Jesus desde la circunferencia exterior pasando por el centro.

Click para ampliar

Las calles de Washington reflejan el octogono o la nueva era dorada.

Click para ampliar

Click para ampliar

Click para ampliar

Fractales de tiempo del octogono regenerativo-24 horas del dia
8 octogono/33 = 0.242424
8 octogono/33.333..=0.2400024
La lineas amarillas que alternan en 33 grados tienden y por lo tanto median hacia la semilla de la flor octogonal en verde del toro geometrico comprendido en el hipercubo.

Click para ampliar

Click para ampliar

Click para ampliar

Click para ampliar

Última edición por IndigoMerovingio; 12-nov-2012 a las 19:24

Reply  Message 14 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 20/02/2013 07:39

Reply  Message 15 of 61 on the subject 
From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 25/02/2013 17:31

Giza, Pyramids, Obelisks and Geometry - YouTube

www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ...19 Mar. 2012 - 23 min. - Subido por SamuelLaboy
  • Geographic Geometry - 1

    www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_geographic_geometry_1.htm - En caché - Similares
    Paul Michell and Charles Henry have noted the relationship between the Great
    Pyramid and the Vesica Pisces. The small circles in this diagram are one inch in ...
  • The Giza Plateau, Egypt.

    www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/egyptghiza.htm - En caché - Similares
    (Full descriptive analysis of the Giza plateau and the Great pyramid). Historical
    ..... The exterior angle of the great pyramid can be formed with the vesica-pisces.
  • Human Form From Sacred Geometry

    www.people.vcu.edu/~chenry/ - En caché - Similares
    23 Jul 2002 ... Linking The Great Pyramid to the Human Form ... The Vesica Piscis is one of the
    most fundamental geometrical forms of this ancient discipline ...
  • The Great Pryamid and the 153 Fish in the Net

    www.greatdreams.com/numbers/jerry/153.htm - En caché - Similares
    12 Oct 2006 ... The Great Pyramid and the 153 Fish in the Net. According to John, Jesus ... The
    Pythagoreans called this shape vesica piscis. The ratio of the ...
  • Pyramid Fields | Energy Research

    www.alexpetty.com/2009/10/31/pyramid-fields/ - En caché - Similares
    31 Oct 2009 ... A fact which appears to connect the operation of the great Pyramids in ... Step 1,
    arrange two circles in the so called “Vesica Piscis” where the ...
  • Page 4 - The Official Graham Hancock Website: Forum

    www.grahamhancock.com/forum/AlisonJ1-p4.htm - En caché
    Paul Michell and Charles Henry have noted the relationship between the Great
    Pyramid and the Vesica Pisces. The small circles in this diagram are one inch in ...
  • Sacred Geometry

    www.slideserve.com/lali/sacred-geometry - En caché
    14 Apr 2012 ... Vesica Piscis. 18. Vesica Piscis and Relationship to Great Pyramid. 19. Vesica
    Piscis and Relationship to Gothic Arch. 20. Vesica Piscis and the ...
  • Tarot History Forum • View topic - An Elixir of Memory & Wisdom?

    forum.tarothistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=438&p... - En caché
    28 Mar 2010 ... By utilizing the seked proportion used for the Great Pyramid, the ... to the Great
    Work thru its' completion of a matrix for the vesica piscis ...
  • Gateways to the Otherworld: The Secrets Beyond the Final Journey, ... - Resultado de Google Books

    Gardiner, Philip - ‎2009 - 552 páginas
    Was there any relationship between the Vesica Piscis and the Great Pyramid?
    The Great Pyramid is also created using sacred geometry—the approximate 52° ...

  • Reply  Message 16 of 61 on the subject 
    From: BARILOCHENSE6999 Sent: 25/02/2013 17:35
    whatiremembered:  Vesica Piscis with the outline of the Great Pyramid


    Vesica Piscis with the outline of the Great Pyramid



    This circle has a different orientation than the previous diagrams and is two inches in diameter.


    The horizontal axis is the Equator, FC is the 30th parallel, D is 60� North latitude and E is the North Pole.


    The 30th parallel is exactly one-third of the great circle distance from the Equator to the North Pole, and it is located at exactly one-half of the height of the Northern Hemisphere.


    Like the Great Pyramid, the maximum latitude of the line of ancient sites is very close to the 30th parallel.

    This diagram illustrates that the relationship of the 30th parallel to the circumference of the Earth is the geometric relationship known as the Vesica Pisces.


    In relation to the lower circumference, DE is at 30� N latitude.


    In relation to the upper circumference, DE is at 30� S latitude.


    The ratio between the straight line distance of the 30th parallel and the radius of the Earth is 1.732 to one. 1.732 is the square root of three.

    Paul Michell and Charles Henry have noted the relationship between the Great Pyramid and the Vesica Pisces.


    The small circles in this diagram are one inch in diameter, and the large circles are three inches in diameter, forming a small Vesica Pisces circumscribed by a larger one.


    The triangle in this diagram has the same angular dimensions as the Great Pyramid.

    The circle in this diagram also represents the circumference of the Earth with the poles on the vertical axis.


    The radius of the circle is 1.00 inch.


    The exterior and interior equilateral triangles touch the circle only at the 30th parallels and the poles.


    The height of each equilateral triangle is 87% of the length of each of it’s sides:

    3.00 � 3.46 = .87

    1.50 � 1.73 = .87

    1.00 � 1.15 = .87

    The length of each of the sides of the interior triangles, including the straight line distance through the earth at the 30th parallel, is also 87% of the diameter of the Earth:

    1.73 � 2.00 = .87

    The radius of the Earth is also 87% of the distance from the center of the Earth to the point of the exterior triangles’ intersections (AP, AQ, AR, etc.):

    1.00 � 1.15 = .87

    The Greek foot is thought to have been developed before the size and shape of the Earth was known and independently from the foot, which is also thought to have been developed before the size and shape of the Earth was known. The foot is 87% of the length of the Greek foot.

    The mile, which is thought to have been developed before the size and shape of the Earth was known, is 87% of the length of the nautical mile, which was developed specifically in relation to the size of the Earth. The nautical mile equals one minute of latitude, so 60 nautical miles equals one degree of latitude and 5,400 nautical miles equals the 90 degrees of latitude between the Equator and the poles.


    The distance from the Equator to the poles is 6,215 miles:

    5,400 � 6,215 = .87

    One minute of latitude equals one nautical mile at any longitude.


    At the equator, one minute of longitude also equals one nautical mile, but at higher latitudes, the distances between each minute of longitude become shorter. Because the straight line distance through the Earth at the 30th parallel is 87% of the diameter of the Earth, the circumference around the Earth at the 30th parallel is 87% of the circumference of the Earth at the Equator, and each minute of longitude at the 30th parallel is 87% of the distance of each minute of longitude at the Equator. As a result, just as one nautical mile equals one minute of longitude at the Equator, one standard mile equals one minute of longitude at the 30th parallel.

    The currently accepted value for the Equatorial diameter of the Earth is 7,926 miles, with an Equatorial radius of 3,963 miles. The ratio of the radius of the Earth to the straight line distance through the Earth at the 30th parallel is 1:1.732.

    3,963 miles x 1.732 = 6,864 miles (the straight line distance through the Earth at the 30th parallel).

    6,864 miles x pi = 21,564 miles (the circumference of the Earth at the 30th parallel).

    21,564 miles � 360 degrees = 59.9 miles (one degree of longitude at the 30th parallel).

    59.9 miles � 60 minutes = .998 miles (one minute of longitude at the 30th parallel).

    As an alternative proof, the currently accepted value for the Equatorial circumference of the Earth is 24,902 miles, and the circumference of the 30th parallel is 87% of the circumference of the Earth.

    24,902 miles x .87 = 21,664 miles (the circumference of the Earth at the 30th parallel).

    21,664 miles � 360 degrees = 60.1 miles (one degree of longitude at the 30th parallel).

    60.1 miles � 60 = 1.00 miles (one minute of longitude at the 30th parallel).

    Conclusion: One minute of longitude equals one mile at (or, like the Great Pyramid, just below) the 30th parallel.

    Back to Contents

    First  Previous  2 a 16 de 61  Next   Last 
    Previous subject  Next subject
    ©2021 - Gabitos - All rights reserved